I have at times called them gnostics and deitists, but to suggest they are really dualists? Zimmermann makes this charge on pages 11-12 after he defines the term, dualist, to refer to “any unlawful separation of the divine revelation from its mediation through beings and things.”
You know it’s true. For fundamentalists, Scripture is this non-quantifiable object, a paradoxical quirk that exists outside space and time separate from both God and the pages it is written on. Oh, and he even hints as the gnosticism of fundamentalism when he speaks about a “spiritual… certainty.” Fundamentalists separation the flesh and the spirit in an unwarranted way.
But, he does’t just stop there. He calls those who “neglect… sacramental realities” Christian dualists as well.
What really makes all of these dualists? Because they forget that “all human knowledge is mediated.”
Anyway… a dang fine way to begin a book.