Zimmermann — Fundamentalists as Dualists @ivpacademic

incarnational humanism
Click to Order

I have at times called them gnostics and deitists, but to suggest they are really dualists? Zimmermann makes this charge on pages 11-12 after he defines the term, dualist, to refer to “any unlawful separation of the divine revelation from its mediation through beings and things.”

You know it’s true. For fundamentalists, Scripture is this non-quantifiable object, a paradoxical quirk that exists outside space and time separate from both God and the pages it is written on. Oh, and he even hints as the gnosticism of fundamentalism when he speaks about a “spiritual… certainty.” Fundamentalists separation the flesh and the spirit in an unwarranted way.

But, he does’t just stop there. He calls those who “neglect… sacramental realities” Christian dualists as well.

What really makes all of these dualists? Because they forget that “all human knowledge is mediated.”

Anyway… a dang fine way to begin a book.

You Might Also Like

4 Replies to “Zimmermann — Fundamentalists as Dualists @ivpacademic”

  1. “any unlawful separation of the divine revelation from its mediation through beings and things.”….unlawful? Someone must be on drugs. What or who’s law. I am giving you a leading question. Please don’t say God’s laws.

    1. Gary, you are going to have read the book, first.

      However, unlawful is a nice way of saying that fundamentalism breaks the “laws” of Christian tradition and philosophy

  2. That’s what I was afraid of. Crusades, inquisition, and my favorite Numbers 31:17-18 and Leviticus 14:14. Athanasius and numerous others. I hope we have evolved to the 21st century, regardless of tradition. Laws have evolved too, for the Homo sapiens.

Leave a Reply, Please!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.