will the real king david please stand up?

“The ruins are the best example to date of the uncovered fortress city of King David,” said professors Yossi Garfinkel of Hebrew University and Saar Ganor, who led the excavations. “This is indisputable proof of the existence of a central authority in Judah during the time of King David.”

via Archaeologists say they uncovered King David’s Palace | Fox News.

This is upsetting a lot of people, mainly those who deny the authority of the Word of God.

No, I’m kidding.

But it is upsetting some…

I guess it’s like this for me.

If King Dauid is proved to exist near the 10 century BCE, fine. But that doesn’t make him the giant killing, sister marrying, messianic seeder. That’s right, seeder. Say it out loud. Dauid may exist in some historical record, but David is still a literary contextualization.

So, let’s see!

Enhanced by Zemanta

You Might Also Like

4 Replies to “will the real king david please stand up?”

    1. Oh look, Little Honey Tee Tee has a new moniker…

      Look, Tee Tee… Dauid is the Greek form, transliterated. Further, I did this to draw a line between the two.

      I know nuance is difficult for you.

  1. For me, all this discovery shows is how quick folks are too jump to macro conclusions based on what is essentially point data.

    The pendulumn need not swing from extreme to extreme based on each new data point, or based on data points which might not have been identified yet (that is, as yet un-excavated remains). However, as per usual, it’s the media putting the most momentum unto the swinging of the pendulum.

Leave a Reply, Please!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.