Stanley E. Porter on Theological Interpretation

Porter writes,

…(T)heological interpretation is not the way forward in developing theological responsibility in biblical hermeneutics. In fact, I believe that theological interpretation runs the risk of jeopardizing what it means to be a responsible biblical hermeneut, by attempting to to overlook or negate, whether consciously or not, a biblical hermeneutic.

He goes on to suggest that theological interpretation advocates for a “jumbled mix of contradictory proposals. (46)

Now, if that ain’t something. I wince at the idea we have to interpret Scripture according to a “rule of faith.” I think our responsibility includes the progress of academic intellect. If a pre-modern interpretation is rendered in error (as Porter points out, the restriction of women from ministerial roles), then we must be responsible enough to correct it. Pre-modern interpretation is just as limiting as modern interpretation if we act in error.

You Might Also Like

3 Replies to “Stanley E. Porter on Theological Interpretation”

  1. Truer words were never spoken!! (I knew there was something about Stanley Porter that I liked.)

    I’ve been trying to get people unglued from theological interpretation ever since I first found out what it (really) is.

Leave a Reply, Please!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.