Something about peer-reviewed and rejection you’ll need to read

Just had your paper rejected? Don’t worry — that might boost its ultimate citation tally. An excavation of scientific papers’ usually hidden prepublication trajectories from journal to journal has found that papers published after having first been rejected elsewhere receive significantly more citations on average than ones accepted on first submission.

via Rejection improves eventual impact of manuscripts : Nature News & Comment.

So, rejection is not a terrible thing. Unless it is a girl you really like, I guess, but even then… No wait.

Did not mean that.

But, peer reviewed science is great because not everything is just accepted.

You Might Also Like

One Reply to “Something about peer-reviewed and rejection you’ll need to read”

Leave a Reply, Please!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.