Quick thoughts on the Judicial Council decision

You can read the article here. The text of the decision is here.

Some quotes:

  • “A same-sex marriage license issued by competent civil authorities together with the clergy person’s status in a same-sex relationship is a public declaration that the person is a self-avowed practicing homosexual” for purposes of the prohibitive language in the United Methodist Book of Discipline, Paragraphs 304.3 and 2702.1(b), the council ruled.
  • The decision further found that an openly homosexual and partnered bishop may be charged with disobedience to church law, along with other bishops and clergy persons who actively participate in the consecration of that bishop.

Yeah… she stays “in office” until the process is completed, but it appears that given the changes in the BoD in 2016, the process is expected to end one way.

Why? Because she is now deemed self-avowed – deemed by her marriage.

Further, those who consecrated her — and it appears those who ordained self-avowed LGBT candidates can now be charged. This could trickle down to the the BOOMs too. This point may have to be argued, however, bishop is a category of clergy and thus their ruling (I’d argue) doesn’t merely apply to bishops but should apply to clergy who do not meet the qualifications.

I note this line from inside the decision:

What is true for elders must also be true for elders who are bishops.

Further, the Jurisdiction does not mean Denomination.

That means those letters people signed…

You Might Also Like

2 Replies to “Quick thoughts on the Judicial Council decision”

  1. I find your comments helpful, thank you for the work you do to lift Jesus above all. I noticed you have training in mental health. How do you see depression and its causes on those with schizophrenic disorder. I need to get a deeper understanding so can help with someone who has this. thank you, Connie

Leave a Reply, Please!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.