Yesterday, as a group which I attend discussed ]]’ view on foreign policy, some noted that he used Micah 4.4 as the central point, while several disagreed with Wallis’ application. I think that the first mistake is not to take the verse in context:
In the last days, the mountain of the LORD’s house will be the highest of all– the most important place on earth. It will be raised above the other hills, and people from all over the world will stream there to worship. People from many nations will come and say, “Come, let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of Jacob’s God. There he will teach us his ways, and we will walk in his paths.” For the LORD’s teaching will go out from Zion; his word will go out from Jerusalem. The LORD will mediate between peoples and will settle disputes between strong nations far away. They will hammer their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation will no longer fight against nation, nor train for war anymore. (Mic 4:1-3 NLT)
So, it is speaking of the last days, when peace will reign among the peoples.
Okay, gotcha, but what if you don’t believe in dispensationalistic eschatology as developed lately, but in that Christ inaugurated the eschaton? And that the eschaton is not fully realized until we are with Christ?
But, the question which the group wrestled with is whether or not Christians work towards this goal or is it something that we wait for God to accomplish himself?