Too often today ‘Christians’ assume that offensive words are the harshest of criticisms, but throughout the life of the primitive Church, the saints experienced a wide range of real persecutions. (By the way, all of this relates to an upcoming sermon on the Valley of Baca). An early church historian once wrote concerning a particular vile method of disposing of the saints. They would bend two saplings down, tie the brother or sister’s legs to each tree and let the trees snap back into position.
One of the examples of persecution comes from Pliny the Younger, a Roman bureaucrat about the time Revelation was written.
At Early Christian Writings you can find his letter, as well as a host of other important early literature.
In letter 10.96-97, in writing to the Roman Emperor Trajan, Pliny writes:
It is my practice, my lord, to refer to you all matters concerning which I am in doubt. For who can better give guidance to my hesitation or inform my ignorance? I have never participated in trials of Christians. I therefore do not know what offenses it is the practice to punish or investigate, and to what extent. And I have been not a little hesitant as to whether there should be any distinction on account of age or no difference between the very young and the more mature; whether pardon is to be granted for repentance, or, if a man has once been a Christian, it does him no good to have ceased to be one; whether the name itself, even without offenses, or only the offenses associated with the name are to be punished.
Meanwhile, in the case of those who were denounced to me as Christians, I have observed the following procedure: I interrogated these as to whether they were Christians; those who confessed I interrogated a second and a third time, threatening them with punishment; those who persisted I ordered executed. For I had no doubt that, whatever the nature of their creed, stubbornness and inflexible obstinacy surely deserve to be punished. There were others possessed of the same folly; but because they were Roman citizens, I signed an order for them to be transferred to Rome.
Soon accusations spread, as usually happens, because of the proceedings going on, and several incidents occurred. An anonymous document was published containing the names of many persons. Those who denied that they were or had been Christians, when they invoked the gods in words dictated by me, offered prayer with incense and wine to your image, which I had ordered to be brought for this purpose together with statues of the gods, and moreover cursed Christ--none of which those who are really Christians, it is said, can be forced to do–these I thought should be discharged. Others named by the informer declared that they were Christians, but then denied it, asserting that they had been but had ceased to be, some three years before, others many years, some as much as twenty-five years. They all worshiped your image and the statues of the gods, and cursed Christ.
They asserted, however, that the sum and substance of their fault or error had been that they were accustomed to meet on a fixed day before dawn and sing responsively a hymn to Christ as to a god, and to bind themselves by oath, not to some crime, but not to commit fraud, theft, or adultery, not falsify their trust, nor to refuse to return a trust when called upon to do so. When this was over, it was their custom to depart and to assemble again to partake of food–but ordinary and innocent food. Even this, they affirmed, they had ceased to do after my edict by which, in accordance with your instructions, I had forbidden political associations. Accordingly, I judged it all the more necessary to find out what the truth was by torturing two female slaves who were called deaconesses. But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition.
I therefore postponed the investigation and hastened to consult you. For the matter seemed to me to warrant consulting you, especially because of the number involved. For many persons of every age, every rank, and also of both sexes are and will be endangered. For the contagion of this superstition has spread not only to the cities but also to the villages and farms. But it seems possible to check and cure it. It is certainly quite clear that the temples, which had been almost deserted, have begun to be frequented, that the established religious rites, long neglected, are being resumed, and that from everywhere sacrificial animals are coming, for which until now very few purchasers could be found. Hence it is easy to imagine what a multitude of people can be reformed if an opportunity for repentance is afforded.
One of the things that first strike me is that Pliny himself sets a difference between those that are true Saints of God. Those who really are, cannot curse Christ. He also says that they sings hymns to Christ as if to a god. Is that so strange? Was in not some 60 years before this letter that Christ was crucified? Could the ‘excessive superstition’ have really grown that much, and faced such opposition, if it had not been founded upon something valid? We know by history and tradition that the Apostles, save John, all died a martyr’s death. Could you really get people who just told stories to die for that story?
And what about these people, subjects of Rome, who did not deny Christ, a Jewish criminal horribly crucified by Rome, how could these gentiles come to give their lives for such a cause?
Why? Because of what many call ‘a religious experience’. In 60 years no amount of tradition could have caused people to die, especially since Rome itself expected and respected only those things that were ancient.
Something else stands out: Pliny says that the disease can be cured. He states that it was not just in the cities, but had spread to the rural areas as well! But, in his opinion, it could be checked. Some 1900 years later, it has yet to be checked and cured, although too many have tried!