My scientific approach to faith?

To prove God is to prove a negative; to prove god is to define god so that there is no god.

Since coming out of fundamentalism, I would rather combine these too. I do not have faith in God as there is no need for me too. I have faith in the Christian Tradition, however, and a hope. But, it requires proof from time to time.

I would rather go on about this, but I am ill at the moment.

What are your thoughts?


By the way, Jim West has differing thoughts.

You Might Also Like

One Reply to “My scientific approach to faith?”

  1. I think Jim is right in calling the picture a false dichotomy. But I also think you are right in stating that proving God would render God falsifiable. Both positions are compatible.

Leave a Reply, Please!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.