Does this mean that when the Healthcare Mandate is thrown out, Chris Matthews will be able to drop the F-bomb?

This is the case’s second trip to the Supreme Court in three years. Initially, Fox and ABC fought their fines by attacking the rule change as unlawfully arbitrary, but the justices rejected that argument in 2009, with the conservatives prevailing on a 5-4 vote. This time, the networks argued that the FCC had violated the First Amendment, contending that the rule chilled protected speech by coupling threats of crippling fines with inadequate guidance on how to comply. ABC and Fox also went after the broadcast indecency regime itself, maintaining that it has been fatally undermined by the rise of widely accessible cable, satellite and Internet television — all beyond the FCC’s regulatory reach — and the availability of parental controls technology to protect children without the need for governmental intervention.

via Supreme Court Overturns Fleeting Expletives Ruling, Ducks Larger Issues.

Well, let’s see where this takes us….

You Might Also Like

Leave a Reply, Please!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.