Guess what? Seems that Creation Scientists are proving evolution, or that the very least, disproving Creation Science. Matt Walker writes,
One scientist has decided to use creation science to test the validity of evolution.
Because, he says, if it turns out that creation science proves evolution, then by its own logic, it will have to reject its own canon of research that previously denied it.
Awesome, but he goes into detail how certain techniques used by Creation ‘Scientists’ prove evolution. You’ll have to read the article for that piece of information.
Now, if you don’t want to wade through everything, or if you have a difficult time wading through it, read Peter’s comments, which is best, sort of, summed up here:
Walker explains (otherwise I know little about this subject) that creationists have used baraminology to conclude that all cats, including lions, tigers and domestic cats, have a common ancestor and so form one “kind” in the biblical sense (Genesis 1:11-12,21,24-25, 6:20 etc). However, this technique shows that there is insufficient evidence, in the form of “missing link” type fossils, of a common ancestor of dogs and cats, suggesting that dogs form a separate “kind”.
Of course, what remains now is for Creation ‘Scientists’ to stand by their own science, or engage in the theory of motivated reasoning, trash their ‘science’ and start over again.