Less than a year after Cedarville University hired theologian Michael Pahl, administrators relieved the associate professor of his teaching duties.
The issue at stake? A historical Adam and Eve, a debate that dates back to Augustine and has recently cropped up at evangelical schools such as Calvin College and Reformed Theological Seminary. But what appears new in Cedarville’s situation is the trustees’ requirement that faculty hold particular beliefs for particular reasons.
Pahl affirms the Ohio school’s doctrinal statement (recently augmented by trustees via theological white papers) regarding human origins, but his beliefs are based on a literary reading of Genesis 1 and 2.
“I hold to a historical Adam and Eve, though not on exegetical grounds,” Pahl wrote in his defense to trustees, which CT obtained. “My reasons are more theological in nature …. he doctrinal statement does not mandate specific exegesis of specific biblical passages.”
This is the common theme, it seems. First, it was Peter Enns, then Le Donne, then Rollston and now Michael Pahl.
See what Jim has to say.
And, be kind. Buy his books.
And visit his website here.
Follow him on Twitter here.
Read what Dr. Pahl has to say at his blog.