Cedarville University dispenses with Academic Integrity

Less than a year after Cedarville University hired theologian Michael Pahl, administrators relieved the associate professor of his teaching duties.

The issue at stake? A historical Adam and Eve, a debate that dates back to Augustine and has recently cropped up at evangelical schools such as Calvin College and Reformed Theological Seminary. But what appears new in Cedarville’s situation is the trustees’ requirement that faculty hold particular beliefs for particular reasons.

Pahl affirms the Ohio school’s doctrinal statement (recently augmented by trustees via theological white papers) regarding human origins, but his beliefs are based on a literary reading of Genesis 1 and 2.

“I hold to a historical Adam and Eve, though not on exegetical grounds,” Pahl wrote in his defense to trustees, which CT obtained. “My reasons are more theological in nature …. he doctrinal statement does not mandate specific exegesis of specific biblical passages.”

via Crisis of Faith Statements | Christianity Today.

This is the common theme, it seems. First, it was Peter Enns, then Le Donne, then Rollston and now Michael Pahl.

See what Jim has to say.

And, be kind. Buy his books.

And visit his website here.

Follow him on Twitter here.

Read what Dr. Pahl has to say at his blog.

You Might Also Like

2 Replies to “Cedarville University dispenses with Academic Integrity”

  1. i went to that august university when it was a simple college. i think, upon reflection, its about dispensationalism. It maybe more about the reading of Revelation then Genesis.

Leave a Reply, Please!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.