1. I think this is the sweet thing about the NAS Bible Updated. They only updated it as to the Thee and Thy’s addressed to God in prayer, and the best Geek Text at the time in 1999. It should not need revision for many years to come (even though it is ten years now). As a more literal translation. Look at it’s American predecessor, the 1901 American Standard. Still used for its most literal method.
    Also,we shall see how the ESV does here?

    I like the NIV “dynamic equivalence” translation, and feel it really needs no revision. If one whats something newer, then go with the New Living Translation, perhaps.

    Sadly, I feel this is about money, and the publishers desire to strike into this aspect, rather than the purity of God’s Word!

    One man’s thoughts anyway!
    Fr. R.


Leave a Reply, Please!