1. Robert

    I believe 2 Clement is also noted as dubious by Eeusebius, or is it Irenaeus, when describing it. When we read patristic literature closely enough we see many conversations about pseudonymity happening across their works. Though these aren’t necessarily definite conclusions against established authorship, they should I’ve us pause.


    1. Agreed. There is a book out by a Catholic priest which posits 1 Clement as pre-70. Would be interesting to see what literary artefacts are hidden in there.


Leave a Reply, Please!