Unsettled Christianity

One blog to rule them all, One blog to find them, One blog to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
May 2nd, 2013

No Military Court Martial for Christians — what will @toddstarnes do now?

These are accurate statements quoted within a proper context without hyperbolic rhetoric:

Members of the military are free to share their faith as long as they don’t harrass others, the Department of Defense said in a statement today.

A Pentagon ban on proselytzing had caused an uproar in social media this week. Conservative activists claimed that service members could face court martial for talking about Jesus.

via Military says no court martials for sharing faith | The Tennessean | tennessean.com.

Or, in other words, things you’ll never see on Fox News.

Among the other things Starnes will do is to suggest that he and other conversabloggers have somehow coerced the Government into this admission. A lot of word-play here on their part, but that is what they do. I’m sure they’ll get Tony Perkins on the air in some form to suggest this may be a rouse or that we have to keep our guard up.

One thing I failed to mention in my post about this yesterday – when you join the military, you give up many basic rights and civil liberties, such as speech, association, and others. It’s part of the role you play, I guess.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
November 28th, 2012

Tony Perkins doesn’t understand modern economics

“American liberals are upset that Ugandan Pres is leading his nation in repentance — afraid of a modern example of a nation prospered by God,” the FRC’s Tony Perkins tweeted on Monday.

Uganda Has Tony Perkins Support | Advocate.com.

What? How do I know? Because killing gays is not the best way to obtain your god’s favor for good crops. Killing Virgins, on the other hand..

Where is Rick Warren and other big namers who supported this bill?

And why is that Tony Perkins can get away with this, let loose by other Christians when everyone who can read knows what he said in the space of 140 characters?

August 29th, 2012

No, the FRC is not biblically based…

So stop wondering why it is labeled a hate group by the SPLC, Nathan.

I can’t figure out how any group, especially one that is biblically based can legitimately be called a “hate group.” If living out the tenets of one’s faith and operating an organization based on those principles is enough to warrant being labeled a hate group then SPLC is going to have to update and increase their list of hate groups to include every Catholic charity, Christian owned business, religious non-profit, and individual citizen living out the beliefs taught in the Bible on homosexuality.

That’s a far leap to make, actually. But, the problem with Nathan and others is that they regularly taking the wrong flying leaps in the wrong direction.

What is the FRC a hate group? Because Tony Perkins is associated with David Duke. They love to issue hate speeches. They love bullying. I mean, the FRC makes it an effort to protect the right for bullies to bully LGBT children. If you need more

Exactly what biblical principles are they founded on?

August 20th, 2012

Tony Perkins is the face of Christianity?

tony perkins david duke

 

August 20th, 2012

Maybe Anne Rice was correct: Family Research Council: ‘We Support Todd Akin Fully And Completely’

Zeke Miller at Buzzfeed reports:

“We feel this is a case of gotcha politics,” Mackey told reporters outside of the Republican National Committee’s platform committee discussions. “He has been elected five times in that community in Missouri. They know who Todd Akin is. We know who Todd Akin is. We’ve worked with him up on the Hill. He’s a defender of life. He’s a defender of families and this just a controversy built up, I think, it looks as though, to support his opposition. Claire Mccaskill on the other hand, has supported planned parenthood all these years, which is under investigation for use of funds, for cover up on statuatory rape and I think that Todd Akin is getting a really bad break here.”

Perkins and Mackey declined to comment on the substance of Akin’s controversial charge.

“I don’t know anything about the science or the legal implications of his statement. I do know politics, and I know gotcha politics when I see it,” Mackey added.

Perkins called the controversy an attempt to divert attention form McCaskill. “Claire McCaskill has been supportive of planned parenthood, an organization that has been under investigation for criminal activity,” Perkins said.

“For other Republicans, I have not seen Scott Brown’s statement, but he should be careful because based on some of his statements there may be some call for him to get out of his race,” Perkins added.

Asked what he was referring to, Perkins said that Brown has been “off the reservation on a number of Republican issues, conservative issues.”

via Family Research Council: ‘We Support Todd Akin Fully And Completely’ | The New Civil Rights Movement.

Wait… so they do not know about the science, but they still support him?

This is disgusting…

What the AFA and the FRC are doing is attempting to provide Akin coverage – religious coverage, to make this a religious attack.

HT – RJW, via FB.

April 24th, 2012

If you think Mike and Ike (candy, dude, candy) symbolize Gay divorce, you may in fact be…

Tony Perkins. What? No, seriously. He said this:

These days, you can’t get a sugar high without experiencing a cultural low. Hello, I’m Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council in Washington, D.C. There’s trouble in candy land. After more than 70 years together, Mike & Ike are calling it quits. The duo is staging a gay divorce as part of a new ad campaign to draw in younger customers. In this society, even candy has an agenda! From Facebook to Tumblr, the fruity pair says, “The rumors are true. We just couldn’t agree on stuff anymore.” Starting this summer, the company will spend $15 million on billboards and TV commercials that poke fun at the breakup. It’s just another subtle example of society chipping away at the value of marriage. And I don’t know what’s more disturbing–that advertisers think divorce appeals to kids or that sexualizing candy will make people buy more. After a year-long build-up, the company will reveal if the couple reconciles. Until then, look for Mike & Ike to have a distinctly liberal flavor.

Where did he get that from? I guess he either conjured it up himself (hiding something Tony? You know, two guys can have a platonic, er, I mean, non-homosexual friendship. Just look at David and Jonathon) or stole it from the funny folks at HuffPo.

Now, the original story and the original intent is not gay divorce, but something along the lines of a band break up.

The character Mike wrote on Tumblr on Tuesday: “So over it. Instead of all this hassle, now I’m just gonna jam.” Later, he adds, “I can’t wait to share with you all the stuff I have in mind — sick music festivals, dope new songs, a music video.”

I’m afraid for Tony and everyone else who sees the gay boogey man behind every corner, or same-sex friendship.

Enhanced by Zemanta
October 13th, 2011

The Family Research Council Opposes the Tea Party

On no… Joel’s doing that slightly annoying thing of making titles up which are opposite of what the story actually is to call attention to the hypocrisy of the group.

That’s right.

Seems that the Family Research Council is calling for prayer against the Occupy Wall Street crowd:

Days of Rage/Occupy Wall Street — The sixties-style tent city protest, which seemed to fizzle after its September 17 launch, now has momentum and is expanding to cities across the nation, including Washington, D.C. Organizers of the movement (e.g. ACORN, labor unions, and other far-left leaders and groups) have been given new life by the sycophant liberal media, Hollywood celebrities and leading Democrats in Washington, including President Obama. Six arrests were made when one hundred demonstrators conducted an illegal demonstration inside a Senate office building (see Gullible, Who’s Behind it?, Official Website, Senate Building).

  • May God prevent these radical organizers from stirring revolution and distracting voters from the elections and keeping watch on our elected leaders (Num 16:1-14; Is 1:4-6; Pr 12:11-12; Mt 26:41; Eph 4:28; 1 Tim 6:3-10; Heb 13:5-6).

First, to the lies – ACORN is gone. Labor Unions didn’t organize this, and only later joined the group.

Second, the shear hypocrisy:

Our current TEA Party movement in America takes its inspiration from the Boston Tea Party of 1774. That’s when Americans — demanding their rights as Englishmen, protesting against King George III’s violations of Magna Carta — dumped English tea into the harbor. Our TEA Party activists are right to protest against an all-powerful, all-taxing, all-spending government. (here)

Finally, as my co-author Ken Klukowski and I discuss in our new book, “Resurgent: How Constitutional Conservatism can Save America,” the Balanced Budget Amendment must have the type of guidelines set forth by Tea Party champion Sen. Mike Lee of Utah. Not only will it require expenditures to equal revenues, spending would be capped at an approximately historical 18 percent of GDP, and all future tax increases would require a two-thirds super-majority vote for approval. (here)

Taxes have frustrated Americans since before the nation’s founding. Recently, the tea party movement has brought renewed attention to how tax rates are hurting families and the companies where they work.

Of course, today’s movement is not new, but rooted in our nation’s founding. And the name–and values–of the first tea party leader might surprise you.

The modern tea party movement began with Rick Santelli’s famous rant on the fl oor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. CNBC carried him live on Feb. 19, 2009, as he protested the Obama administration’s new mortgage bailout plan: “The government is promoting bad behavior. This is America!” He called for another American tea party, and the rest is history. (here – a lie which is continued to be spread)

There appears to be a concerted effort among the political Left and many mainstream media people to demonize and marginalize the expanding citizen-based movement known as the tea party movement. This effort flows from both a fear of what these tea parties represent and a contempt for everyday Americans. But those ordinary citizens are poised to be the ones laughing when it’s all over, when democracy takes its course. (here)

You can go to their site, via Google, and find lots of pro-Tea Party op-eds, but when others get together, well, then, they are dirty, no good commie hippies bent on destroying our Republic!

This is the hypocrisy of the Family Research Council. And why are they afraid of it? I submit to, some of the links below:

Enhanced by Zemanta
August 6th, 2011

The Response is the Worst thing to happen to American Christianity in a long time

Why? Because it has allowed the worse of American Christians, Joel’s Army and the New Apostolic Reformation, to have a national stage. But, beyond that, the individuals themselves have questionable beliefs. You know, like Tony Perkins and his ties to the KKK or Bryan Fischer. Further, their ‘prophetic statements’ among other things, have reached the level of outright heresy, lies, and attacks on Scripture. To be honest, there isn’t enough time in the day to go through the list of people who spoke and their abhorrent theologies. Or, perhaps, what they have said about other Christians, especially Catholics and Mainliners.

I find it funny that in Scripture, the only persons able to call a nation to prayer was a king… a fact that did not escape mention today:

While you are at it, read Rodney’s post…

NBC is reporting about 25,000 in attendance… in a stadium which should hold about 71,000.

If Texas Gov. Rick Perry runs for president, the type of crowd that attends a seven-hour prayer rally in a football stadium would not be disappointed.

Held in the venue where the Houston Texans play, more than 25,000 people here attended “The Response,” an event that was part prayer service, part Christian rock concert, and part marathon pep rally for Jesus Christ.

Enhanced by Zemanta
December 2nd, 2010

Christians, the FRC and the SPLC hate list

Rainbow flag flapping in the wind with blue sk...
Image via Wikipedia

Ultimately, this is a real problem for American Christianity. One should be able to trust Christian groups to provide accurate information and nuanced analysis. However, on issues relating to sexual orientation, I cannot trust them. For me, this lack of trust spills over to other domains as well, creating a significant problem with credibility. I hope my fellow believers will not defend these claims simply because those making them are Christians.

There are many negative consequences which derive from the myths, overgeneralizations and stereotypes. For instance, I know of a handful of situations where men were kept from their grandchildren or children by other family members because they disclosed same-sex attraction. Even though the men involved had no attraction for children, their families feared them because they experienced homosexual attractions. I know of more than one man who had to defend his right to have custody of his children because he divulged his homosexual attractions to a Christian leader. The families and Christian leaders were driven to fear because of rhetoric from one or more of the groups now on the SPLC list.

What should Christians do about the SPLC hate list? — Warren Throckmorton.

Read the entire article.

Recently, the SPLC has branded the Family Research Council a hate-group, not for their views on homosexuality, but for their messages so delivered. This might not be a dividing line for many, but the SPLC is claiming that the FRC is purposely distorting facts on homosexuality. The author of the above post is correct – it behooves us as Christians to hold each other to a higher standard when we are making any sort of claims.

Now, I have my own issues with the SPLC and their use of ‘hate group’, so don’t get me wrong in thinking that I would automatically support them. I do, however, feel that the labeling of the FRC as such to be a good thing, for several reasons.

What sayeth ye?

Enhanced by Zemanta
December 5th, 2009

Lies from the FRC: Politics, Religion, and Homosexuality

From a four-page letter (PDF) from the Family Research Council’s Tony Perkins to their members….

Read the rest of this entry »

September 5th, 2009

What’s wrong with the Churches in America? Greenwell Springs Baptist Church

A few weeks ago, Greenwell Springs Baptist Church hosted a town hall – a TOWN HALL. Whether Liberal or Conservative issues, Churches should not be involved in politics. We are called to be holy – apart, separate – and yet pastors around the country are holding these things.

Now, I have a few friends that attend here, and I have expressed my opinion – and will do so again. Christians are called to be separated from this world, and frankly, I cannot say it any better than the unknown author of the Epistle to Diognetus.

Some of the videos of the event can be found here. Frankly, it sickens me to see politicians politicking next to the cross. No, Christ did not die to give you political freedom nor to keep you from getting a national health care reform. Below is the letter which Tony Perkins sent out.

Tony Perkins:

Last night I was in Baton Rouge participating in a town hall meeting that drew over 800 people to my home church. Dr. Dennis Terry, the senior pastor at Greenwell Springs Baptist, moderated the nearly three hour meeting which included a brief exhortation on what the Bible has to say about health care by Rev. Dick Metz, another local pastor. Those in attendance heard introductory comments by Senator David Vitter, Dr. Al Krostroski with the Louisiana Right to Life, local family physician Dr. Kyle Dean and me.

Although Sen. Mary Landrieu sent a representative, like many of the Congressmen and Senators who support the President’s health care reform effort, continues to avoid open forums with the public. The questions and statements from the audience were clear and on point. People are concerned over the government stepping into health care, but their biggest worry is what this effort represents and where it will lead — more costly government that will grasp more control over our lives.

Even the young people are connecting the dots. A 15 year-old boy inquired about the President’s Science Czar, John Holdren, and whether or not the radical ideas he expressed in the 1970s, such as involuntary sterilization as a means of population control, could eventually find their way into the President’s proposed government health care system. Make no mistake about it, President Obama’s plan poses serious moral and ethical threats to the nation, but I am encouraged by what I am seeing all across our country. Americans have had enough and they are speaking out like I’ve not witnessed in my nearly 20 years in the political realm. Keep speaking out and encourage the leadership of your church to host a town hall meet.

One of the things which is immediately wrong with this – whether or not you might agree with Tony Perkins and David Vitter (you do remember David Vitter right?) is that they have taken time away from actually preaching the Gospel – although I have wonder if they know what that means – to listen to propaganda. No one, it seems, has learned the lesson from Nazi Germany where the Churches were used to secure support for Hitler.

Keep politics off the pulpit and out of the Church house.