Unsettled Christianity

One blog to rule them all, One blog to find them, One blog to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
June 2nd, 2010

Psalms of Solomon, Psalms 12-16 – Analysis

Psalm 12 – Pertaining to Salomon. Against the tongue of the transgressor of the Law.

Starting with the twelfth psalm we find a low point of despair felt by the community, both corporately and individually, until suddenly in the seventeenth psalm, hope breaks loose. The focus on this psalm should center on a new word in the Greek, ἐπαγγελίας. Here, as it is in 2nd Maccabees 2.17-18, it is seen as something secured by God but comes through the Law. The same word is found in several New Testament passages[1], all dealing with the promises of God. It is possible that the final verse also alludes to Isaiah 53 (among other passages in Isaiah in which Israel is seen as a Servant) which was the traditional interpretation, only later adopted by Christians to interpret the Christ-event.

Psalm 13 – Pertaining to Salomon. Comfort for the Righteous

James Dunn continuously points out the dichotomy of community in passages such as Psalm 13. Those inside are clearly righteous and will receive God’s goodness while those on the outside are sinners, deserving the all the punishment from God. For the righteous, their receive their discipline in  περιστολῇ[2] which keeps the sinners from rejoicing. This viewpoint is not only found in the Psalms of Solomon, but in Wisdom of Solomon[3] as well, has common enough that Paul would address it in Romans 2-4. The δεξιὰ κυρίου is seen as a shelter of the righteous, which is finds a counterpart in the New Testament where Christ is said to sit at the right hand of God[4]. Again, as in Psalm 12, we find Israel to be personified as a υἱὸν ἀγαπήσεως and πρωτοτόκου, both terms later applied to Jesus by the writers of the New Testament.

Psalm 14 – A Hymn. Pertaining to Salomon.

Nickelsburg rightly calls this a ‘paraphrase of the canonical Psalm 1.[5]’ Much of the same forward motion is used to describe the journey of the righteous and the slowing of the sinner. It is also replete with images of the afterlife of those who obey Leviticus 18.5 and those who do not, which find its way into later theological development. Most notable are the τὰ ξύλα τῆς ζωῆς (v3) and the inheritance of the sinners which is αὐτῶν ᾅδης καὶ σκότος καὶ ἀπώλεια καὶ οὐχ εὑρεθήσονται ἐν ἡμέρᾳ ἐλέους δικαίων (v9).

Psalm 15 – A Psalm. Pertaining to Salomon. With an Ode

As the author(s), or collectors, approach the seventeenth psalm, the despair of the community and the desire to see the sinners punished rises in a crescendo. This psalm is filled with several themes found in Christian eschatology, such as the φλὸξ πυρὸς (v4), the σημεῖον τοῦ θεοῦ for the Righteous (6), and the σημεῖον τῆς ἀπωλείας ἐπὶ τοῦ μετώπου αὐτῶν  (v9) for the sinners. This is reminiscent of Genesis 4.15 and Exodus 12.21-23, followed later by Christian eschatological separation of the righteous and the sinners in Revelation 14. Much as the picture presented in Revelation, there is no hope for the sinners. In this psalm, the Righteous will overtake and destroy the sinners, including the weapons of the sinners which are similar to the Four Horsemen of Revelation 6, famine, war, and death.

Psalm 16 – A Hymn. Pertaining to Salomon. Regarding help for the devout.

The final psalm in the series of self-pity, self-righteousness, and the calls for the destruction of the sinners centers on the election of the individual and community. The fifth verse is key to the psalm, stating, ἐξομολογήσομαί σοι ὁ θεός ὅτι ἀντελάβου μου εἰς σωτηρίαν καὶ οὐκ ἐλογίσω με μετὰ τῶν ἁμαρτωλῶν εἰς ἀπώλειαν. The author does not see what later Christian theologians would call ‘eternal security’ however, recognizing that he could fall into transgression with the aid of a γυναικὸς παρανομούσης(v8). He asks for protection with the truth against his tongue and lips (v10) ending the hymn with a plea for strength, noting that if the righteous endures until the end of the trial, then he would receive mercy from God[6].


[1] Acts 7.5; Tit. 1:2; Jas. 1.12, 2.5; 1 Jn. 2:25

[2] distinction, NETS Pss Sol 13.8; Liddell-Scott, ‘probably secret.’

[3] See Wis. 11.9-10, 12.22, 16-910; Dunn, 219

[4] Cf Hebrews 1.3

[5] Nicklesburg, 246

[6] cf Matthew 10.16-22

June 1st, 2010

Psalms of Solomon, Psalm 8-10 – Analysis

Psalm 8- Pertaining to Salomon. Regarding Victory

This Psalm is parallel with the second Psalm, in which we do not see an eschatological destruction, but a recounting of a recent event set against the backdrop of a perceived judgment of God. It is tells the story of Pompey’s entrance into the city, invited in by the Hyrcanus (v16-18), who would then proceed to profane the altar of the Lord. This, according to the author of the psalm, was not a free will choice, but directed by God (14-15) as an act of righteous judgment[1]. It does not mention the death of Pompey, which leads Nickelsburg to postulate that this was written before the second psalm[2].

In verse 23, God is pictured as being made ἐδικαιώθη. VanLandingham argues that this term means ‘make righteous’ rather than acquit[3]. If this is so, then it holds that God must accomplish the destruction of Jerusalem through Pompey, allowing even the profaning of his alter, in order that he would be considered righteous for upholding the covenant. Finally, it is worth noting the allusion to Isaiah 53.7 found in verse 23. The devout are seen as innocent lambs in the midst of all the troubles. It was not their sins that caused the destruction of Jerusalem under Rome’s boot, but it is the community who ‘justifies’ the name of God even in the midst of the correction.

Psalm 9 – Pertaining to Salomon. Regarding Rebuke

The psalm opens with a recount of the recent exile into Babylon, picturing it s a necessity for God to remain righteous. In the fourth verse we find a thought which seems to counter post-Reformation era thinking. Here, the only ἔργα which concerns the community are those of free will. For the author, ἔργα are found in the individual’s ability to choose to do what is right or what is wrong, forcing God to react. Those that do what is righteous θησαυρίζει for himself a life with the Lord while those who ‘practice[4]’ injustice will find only destruction[5].

The phrase, ἔθου τὸ ὄνομά σου ἐφ᾽, found in the ninth verse is reminiscent of the Hebrew found in 2nd Chronicles 7.14, נִֽקְרָא־שְׁמִ֣י , possible serving to calling attention to covenant (v10) made between God and Solomon concerning the Temple. While this psalm concerns the covenant, and thus election, made by the Name of God, the author sees the possibility of even the sinner repenting of his or her sins, although it is arguable that the confessor in verse 6 is one inside the community.

Psalm 10  – Among Hymns. Pertaining to Salomon

The Community has appealed to self-humiliation, accepting their punishment as a due reward, seen their Temple defiled, and their sovereignty gone. Now they are appealing to God’s covenant and the testimony therein (v4) that any wrath would be short lived, serving as a correcting measure. The entire Psalm is centered on the fourth verse, with it acting as a zenith of the song. It is worth noting that the phrase διαθήκης αἰωνίου (v4) is found also in Hebrews 13.20, a book heavily influenced by Deuterocanonical material. It ends with an expectation for the salvation of the Lord (v8).


[1] Dunn calls attention to the rhetorical parallels between Pss Sol 8-14, which lists the sins of the people, and Psalm 50.16-21, Philo Conf 163, TLevi 14.4-8 and CD 6.16-17 which is similarly found in Romans 2.17-24). Dunn, 167

[2] Nickelsburg, 240

[3] Chris VanLandingham, Judgment & Justification In Early Judaism And The Apostle Paul, Peabody: Hendrickson Press 2006, 246, 252.

[4] 9.5 NETS

[5] A similar parallel is found in Matthew 6.19-20

December 16th, 2009

The Crucifixion of Sinners at the End of the World

I realize that this is a leap, and I really don’t have the time to either defend or attack the position which I will make; however, for future references and perhaps some conversation, I present this:

Read the rest of this entry »

October 29th, 2009

Theology in the Psalms of Solomon – Conclusion

Conclusion

The New Testament was not written in a vacuum, but written to very religious communities, created and maintained through oral tradition and the written word. While not every document used by these communities is considered canonical today by either Judaism or Christianity, they came close to canonical for these communities. We know of the long struggles over Sirach and Enoch, but nothing significant is mentioned of the Psalms of Solomon, not until the 4th century when we find it attached to a historical manuscript. We know that the PssSol is of more ancient origin than that manuscript, finding traces of it in other documents, sometimes confused with the Odes of Solomon. It is a distinctly Jewish work, and belongs squarely in the Pharisaical tradition. Further, it lays in the same genre of hope as Wisdom and other 2nd Temple Jewish documents of the Messiah and the Resurrection.

Read the rest of this entry »

October 29th, 2009

Messianic Expectation in the Psalms of Solomon (2)

I have divided the 18th Psalm into three sections according to the natural pericope of the text. While the Psalm is dedicated the Lord’s Christ/Lord Christ, only the first portion (v1-4) deals exclusively with him. The next section (v5-9) deals with God’s interaction with the righteous and with the Messiah. The final sections (v10-12) are reminiscent of portions of Enoch’s book(s) on the Astronomical wonders and the Watchers.

Read the rest of this entry »

October 29th, 2009

Messianic Expectation in the Psalms of Solomon (1)

Messianic Expectation:

It was a time of sectarian violence, of political intrigue and of the loss of Israel’s mission to the world. God had been silent for hundreds of years and no prophets filled the land. The Temple was rebuilt, but the people were conquered, the heroes of the past figments of the imagination. David was dust, Solomon gone, Josiah with his fathers, and Judah’s kingdom a Roman province. Judaism was suffering on the enterprise of Hellenistic philosophers, with Jews adopting it or coming so close as not to know the difference.

Read the rest of this entry »

October 29th, 2009

The Resurrection in the Psalms of Solomon

Concern for the afterlife is not something predominantly found in the Hebrew Scriptures, but as we begin to move into 2nd Temple Judaism, we find that the issue of the resurrection started to become more pronounced. For the Jews under the yoke of foreign rules, it was a means not only of escape but of vindication[1]. We find the maturing of this idea, in which righteous works lead to a righteous vindication expressed clearly in the Maccabean books[2]. In the Psalms of Solomon (PssSol), we find much the same idea that the righteous will rise at some future time, while the unrighteous will perish.

Read the rest of this entry »

September 24th, 2008

What part of 'Christian' do they not get? Perhaps it's that quite sinning bit…

Okay, so it’s not news, except that Clay considers himself a ‘born again Christian’. He is gay and has a child out of wedlock. What part of that lifestyle says ‘born again’ and ‘Christian’? Christianity is incompatible with a lifestyle devoted to sin. Friends, when can Christians stand up and begin to say that this or that is not Christianity? Where are those that decry the ‘judgment’ of Todd Bentley (in reality, his doctrine)? Will they decry this as well.

Sin, my friends, is sin. It is well defined in the Bible and is not upon to negotiation.

Read the rest of this entry »

September 4th, 2008

From the Bible that is rarely read: Sirach 15.11-20

Do not say, “Because of the Lord I left the right way”; for he will not do what he hates. Do not say, “It was he who led me astray”; for he had no need of a sinful man. The Lord hates all abominations, and they are not loved by those who fear him. It was he who created man in the beginning, and he left him in the power of his own inclination. If you will, you can keep the commandments, and to act faithfully is a matter of your own choice. He has placed before you fire and water: stretch out your hand for whichever you wish. Before a man are life and death, and whichever he chooses will be given to him. For great is the wisdom of the Lord; he is mighty in power and sees everything; his eyes are on those who fear him, and he knows every deed of man. He has not commanded any one to be ungodly, and he has not given any one permission to sin. (Sirach 15:11-20 from the Revised Standard Version RSV)

I remember being in grade school, 2nd grade I believe, and quickly running a foul of a classmate. He was a PK – preacher’s kid and new to the school. I remember sitting in the cafeteria before school began and having a conversation about the devil – yes, I know, but hey, I didn’t have the blog then! – and he said that it was the devil who makes him do ‘bad things’. It is the same excuse that many people use today – speeding, cursing, violence – ‘the devil made me do it.’ Obviously, this was a problem a few centuries before Christ as well. Sirach confronts it with a very abrupt statement – Don’t blame anyone but yourself. We have free will as a creation of God – we can employ it for good or evil.

Recently, I have been asked about the idea of apostasy. Apostasy involves the idea of falling away from God. It is right to be reminded that nothing can remove us, but we sure can jump ship! The very idea that people would blame God for their sin, transgression, or apostasy appalls Sirach. I have actually met people that blame either the Church or perhaps the Pastor (or the easiest thing to do, is to blame the pastor’s wife) or perhaps a member. The real fault lies in the person themselves. They have chosen to ‘leave the right way’, to ‘fall away’ as the King James Version puts it.

The Greek here is a paraphrase of the Hebrew (yes, contrary to the KJVO myth Sirach was written in Hebrew originally) which reads ‘Say not, From God is my transgression, for that which he hates he made not.’ This leads us to a slightly different understanding of the verse, but both implying that God does not make sin and would not lead people into it. James clearly echoes Sirach here, when he says,

Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am tempted by God”; for God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does He Himself tempt anyone.  (James 1:13 NKJV)

It is interested to note the Hebrew addition to verse 13(b). The Greek says, ‘The Lord hates all abominations, and they are not loved by those who fear him’ to which the Hebrew adds ‘and he will not let it come hear those that fear him.’ Again, Paul agrees here when he says,

For I am persuaded that neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers, nor things present nor things to come, nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Romans 8:38-39 NKJV)

Sirach here sees the orthodox idea of sin – that it is by our own inclination, will, and choice. We must choose to live sinless lives. Sirach says that before us is fire (the curse) and water (the blessing) and it is up to each and everyone of us to choose between the two, but if we choose the fire, then it is not because of God that we do this, the blame falling on our own shoulders.

September 4th, 2008

Text Of Dr. Deborah Pitt’s Reply To Archbishop Rowan Williams

I am not a part of the Church of England; however, knowing the history of that denomination it bewilders me, and disgusts me, to see it falling for the lie that is homosexuality.

I found this letter floating in cyberspace and throughly enjoyed it, so I have posted it here. Dr. Pitt approaches the Archbishop of Canterbury with more grace than I would have, and yet she gets her point across.

Stand Firm | Text Of Dr. Deborah Pitt’s Reply To Archbishop Rowan Williams.

Read the rest of this entry »