Constantinism Redivivus: Pope Innocent III vs. @SarahPalinUSA

English: Pope Innocent III wearing a Y-shaped ...

English: Pope Innocent III wearing a Y-shaped pallium. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Craig provided our response yesterday. I want to provided some other discussion points:

1096, Jews were massacred in the Rhineland,

As enthusiasm mounted for the First Crusade, the motivation to conquer the unbelievers in control of Jerusalem spilled over toward the unbelievers closer to home: the Jews. The mobs sweeping across Europe on their way to the Holy Land found their first victims among the Jews of the Rhineland (in modern-day Germany). Massacres and forced baptisms resulted. Rather than be murdered, large numbers of Jews committed suicide, with the fathers first killing their families and then themselves. The ancient prosperous Jewish communities of the Rhineland were destroyed. This was just the beginning of the indignities wrought upon the Jews by the Crusaders.1

This led to Pope Innocent III’s statement,

411 [DS 781] This is contrary to the Christian religion, that anyone always unwilling and interiorly objecting be compelled to receive and to observe Christianity. On this account some absurdly do not distinguish between unwilling and unwilling, and forced and forced, because he who is violently forced by terrors and punishments, and, lest he incur harm, receives the sacrament of baptism, such a one also as he who under pretense approaches baptism, receives the impressed sign of Christianity, and he himself, just as he willed conditionally although not absolutely, must be forced to the observance of Christian Faith.… But he who never consents, but inwardly contradicts, receives neither the matter nor the sign of the sacrament, because to contradict expressly is more than not to agree.… The sleeping, moreover, and the weak-minded, if before they incurred weak-mindedness, or before they went to sleep persisted in contradiction, because in these the idea of contradiction is understood to endure, although they have been so immersed, they do not receive the sign of the sacrament; not so, however, if they had first lived as catechumens and had the intention of being baptized; therefore, the Church has been accustomed to baptize such in a time of necessity. Thus, then the sacramental operation impresses the sign, when it does not meet the resisting obstacle of a contrary will.2

There is a certain gruesomeness in Sarah Palin’s speech. Not only does she misuse the sacrament, but she would wish to undo the history Christians have thus far attempted to escape — the time when we used torture and forced baptisms to conquer. When these things didn’t work, we offered murder wholesale. This is not necessarily a Catholic feature, as we Protestants have our fair share of this in Africa and the former American colonies. Yes, there is the abuse of the sacrament (and I view baptism pretty high), but there is also the abuse of history, of humanity, and of the image of God.

Her world view of Palin-Constantinism is frightening, not because of the view she necessarily holds, but because so many subscribe to it as well.

Enhanced by Zemanta
  1. Sharon Rusten with E. Michael, The Complete Book of When & Where in the Bible and Throughout History (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., 2005), 168.
  2. Henry Denzinger, Roy J. Deferrari, and Karl Rahner, The Sources of Catholic Dogma (St. Louis, MO: B. Herder Book Co., 1954), 161.

@SarahPalinUSA and @BryanJFischer Don’t Understand Baptism

This first came to my attention this morning when Bryan Fischer tweeted the following gem:

And, here’s the video:

What Sarah Palin states about “baptism” is completely antithetical to the Christian Faith and what a good number of Christians believe about baptism.

The Catholic Church has this to say about baptism:

Holy Baptism is the basis of the whole Christian life, the gateway to life in the Spirit (vitae spiritualis ianua), and the door which gives access to the other sacraments. Through Baptism we are freed from sin and reborn as sons of God; we become members of Christ, are incorporated into the Church and made sharers in her mission: “Baptism is the sacrament of regeneration through water in the word.” (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 342)

My own church, the Lutheran Church, has this to say about baptism:

Concerning baptism it is taught that it is necessary, that grace is offered through it, and that one should also baptize children, who through such baptism are entrusted to God and become pleasing to him. (The Augsburg Confession – German Text – Article IX)

I’m not going to go into infant baptism here, but I will focus on the first part of Article IX, mainly that grace is offered through baptism. That alone is sufficient to show that Sarah Palin has no real understanding of baptism. There is no grace offered through waterboarding; therefore, waterboarding is not in any way, shape, or form a baptism.

Furthermore, baptism is rooted in the Word of God.

What is baptism? Answer:

Baptism is not simply plain water. Instead it is water enclosed in God’s command and connected with God’s Word. (The Small Catechism; The Sacrament of Holy Baptism)

Last I checked, waterboarding was not commanded by God as baptism is. Waterboarding is rooted in the ways of humankind.

Finally, waterboarding fails Christ’s command to love your enemies:

“You have heard that it was said, You must love your neighbor and hate your enemy. But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who harass you so that you will be acting as children of your Father who is in heaven.” (Matthew 5: 43-45, see also Luke 6: 27-36)

Comments like these are absolutely appalling, and to see people cheering the language of fear and torture makes me sick. Christians need to take a long, hard look at both Sarah Palin and Bryan Fischer and hold them accountable for words that are contrary to the Christian faith.

HT: Christian Nightmares for the video.

all you need to know about @sarahpalinusa’s new ‘book’

Palin doesn’t seek the original Christmas (a fourth-century invention), the traditional American Christmas (they didn’t celebrate it), or consumerism-free Christmas (you Communist!). The festival Palin wants to retrieve is the Christmas of her youth. Palin’s Christmas is a medley of joy-filled eating, present opening, charitable giving, and idiosyncratic family tradition.

via Sarah Palin Is Here to Save Christmas, Thank God – The Daily Beast.

Fantastic.

What you need to know about the Million Vet March, Sarah Palin, Ted Cruz, and the Tea Party

From the groups official statement:

We have, as a group, been prevented from certain groups that have piggy-backed off our grassroots efforts, to effectively create a comprehensive media message campaign. We made the mistake of trying to partner with some Washington insiders that thwarted many of our genuine concerns for keeping this apolitical and grassroots. While we support many of those groups common causes for Veterans, we do not support the manner in which they go about it. We chose instead to not incite or create panic.

via Million Vet March Organizers Condemn Sarah Palin, Ted Cruz, and the Tea Party.

By the way, it was hardly 1 million, but it was just big enough to have Confederate flags and other familiar Tea “We’re NuT Racists” slogans (lay down the quran, etc…).

Now I guess Sarah Palin and Ted ‘My Dad was a Communist’ Cruz gets to call the Veterans communists.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

The President’s Christmas Card is blasphemy!

I have to agree with with Fox News Radio who ran ran a report:

The official White House holiday card makes no mention of the word ‘Christmas’ and instead focused on Bo the First Dog based on the wishes of the First Family.

“From our family to yours, may your holidays shine with the light of the season,” read the inside of the card, featuring the presidential seal.

The front of the card features Bo the First Dog lounging by a fireplace. Holiday greenery is draped over the fireplace mantle. Holiday presents are placed on a table underneath a poinsettia – instead of a Christmas tree.

Also, Sarah Palin said:

“It’s odd,” Palin said, wondering why the president’s Christmas card highlights his dog instead of traditions like “family, faith and freedom.”

You see what I mean! Look at that thing! No, wait… That’s Reagan’s Christmas Card…

Click here to see President Obama’s and a few others from across the years…

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thanks John Knox: Don’t vote for Sarah Palin,Michelle Bachmann, or Hillary Clinton

Where do we get the idea that women shouldn’t be in public office?

Some say the Bible. How about Protestant legend John Knox’s interpretation of the bible, to oppose a catholic queen? Just take a look at his The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstrous Regiment of Women.

From this position, added to the fact that John Knox knew of Protestant preachers executed at the hands of Mary I (so much for a more peaceful world if women reigned, yes?), it was a matter of life and death for John Knox to oppose Queen Mary.

To read more, see The First Trumpet Blast Against Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and Michelle Bachmann.

Did Levi Johnston **** Bristol Palin?

NEW YORK - MAY 6:  (NO SALE, NO ARCHIVE) In th...

Image by Getty Images via @daylife

This bothers me, greatly, for a variety of reasons:

The 20-year-old single mother wrote on the night she conceived, “I didn’t know that girl flavored wine coolers were just as likely to get you drunk as the hard stuff” while she was on a camping trip with then boyfriend Levi Johnston.

Before the incident, she vowed to wait until marriage but with no memories of what happened, she got pregnant regardless of being on birth control pills to treat cramps. (here)

There are states with laws which prohibit such things. Think ‘date rape’ which may be caused because of drugs or other substances which are used to intoxicate one person while the other person remains in charge. I saw this, this morning, and I guess others have noticed it as well:

She doesn’t use the word “rape” anywhere in her book, but what she describes seems to be just that.

She writes that she felt her virginity had been “stolen” and that she “tried not to vomit” when she found out what happened.

Palin describes being devastated as she confronted Johnston: “ ‘You knew I didn’t want to have sex until I was married!’ I whispered. ‘How could you?’ ” She also writes that Johnston apologized.

If Palin’s story is accurate, then what she appears to be describing is a nonconsensual — and likely illegal — assault. She doesn’t say whether she was unconscious, too incapacitated to give consent or just unable to remember what happened the next morning. But, by the account she gives, what took place in the woods near Wasilla that night sounds a lot like what Alaska rape law defines as sexual assault in the second degree, when the “offender engages in sexual penetration with a person who the offender knows is . . . incapacitated or unaware that a sexual act is being committed.”

Erin Patterson, lead advocatefor Alaska’s organization Standing Together Against Rape (STAR), says cases similar to what Palin describes have been brought under that law. (Though without witnesses or confessions, like most rape cases, this one would be difficult to prove.)

I’m not sure how a ‘momma grizzley’ should act, but this father would have done some very ugly, unChristian-like things (unless you count parts of the Old Testament, and not that part in Deuteronomy about the rapist marrying her attacker) to the boy.

Of course, there are dissenters too.

It bothers me because stuff like this actually goes on a lot and women are told a variety of things, you know, like she deserved it.

Does this bother you?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Search the Sarah Palin Email Collection!

Alaska Governor Sarah Palin on June 2, 2007.

Image via Wikipedia

This collection contains over 24,000 e-mails from former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin’s administration and was obtained in June 2011, more than two and a half years after the public records request for these materials. Crivella West, at its own expense, converted the paper copies of the e-mails produced back into searchable digital copies and made the digital copies available to the public without charge. In addition, Crivella West has provided analytical tools to organize the documents to help users uncover information of interest. Crivella West is continuing its collaboration with msnbc.com, Mother Jones and Pro Publica. Follow the story on: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/43281157/

Crivella West – Palin Email Collection.

Contrary to my opinion, my name was not mentioned once in them which gives me pause is believing that yes, the entire world does revolve around me. But, alas, only a pause.

Oh, and Jim West is not mentioned either

I suspect that one will find very little, to anything, in these emails but it will be interesting to watch….

Enhanced by Zemanta

Obama has, Palin hasn’t. Will Rodney?

Rodney is ranting again. This time, he writes, among other things

Obama has never admitted to his errors

Several problems, with the first being that the President has admitted that he was wrong:

President Obama uttered three words on Thursday that many of his 43 predecessors twisted themselves into knots trying with varying degrees of success to avoid: “I was wrong.” (here)

Or, what about this one:

Or this one. Or others that you can easily get from Google.

There is a large gulf, however, from admitting that you are wrong and attempting to revise history. There is a difference between gaffes and simply believing your own errors and then, later, announcing that you were indeed correct.

Now, Rodney attempts to say that the President has never admitted that he was wrong. I have shown otherwise.

Will Rodney now admit that the was wrong or will he make an excuse like he does for Queen Sarah?

When you cannot admit that you are wrong, you are done

Frankly, if you are wrong that’s one thing –  everyone is known to be wrong a time or two or dozen or every time one opens one’s mouth – but when you will not admit that you are wrong and further compound your own misconceptions, you prove yourself a dullard, a dilettante, and far, far removed from any qualifications for running for President.

Sarah Palin has no clue about history. But, worse – must worse – she has no clue how to admit that she was wrong.

ht – Scott via Facebook

Enhanced by Zemanta

Rodney’s only label is Contrarian

Sarah Palin at the Time 100 Gala, in Manhattan...

The Epitome of the Mayan Prophecy of 2012

Rodney has taken offense to Scott’s constant rebuking of the Sarah Palin devil.

For the most part, Rodney presents his arguments in somewhat a sane manner, but then he goes on like this:

There are some bloggers who can’t help themselves but post every article from HuffPo or the New York Times, bashing their least favorite politicians’ latest misquote. Yet, these same bloggers can’t ever seem to discuss real policy differences, because they are trying to overcome personal ghosts from the past, i.e., liberals trying to overcome their past conservatism, and vice versa.

He does exactly what he accuses others, and generally rightly so, of doing. He leaves policies to hunt ghosts which more than likely are his own.

This is an older post, but I suspect that much of it has not changed.

Personally, I think that political labels are a little out dated, especially given the shifts we have seen in American politics as of late. Rodney and I agree on many issues, at the core, but the method of application is where we separate.

And, Sarah Palin is a little more than crazy, but I’ll let Rodney bask in the glow of the Queen of Dominionism.

Enhanced by Zemanta