Unsettled Christianity

One blog to rule them all, One blog to find them, One blog to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
January 25th, 2011

Infographic on Why Do Marriages Fall Apart

A couple of different infographics at the site below, but this one I found interesting:

I don’t feel so bad now – we actually have things going in our favor. Both my wife and I have enough baggage to statistically say we should be divorced by now. Both come divorced homes. Both of my parents were married several times. Shucks, I actually watched one set of grandparents get a divorce. We lived together and had a child before marriage. Etc… etc… etc…

So, how do you, if you have dead weight dragging down the probability of a successful marriage make it work?

Infographic of the Day: Why Do Marriages Fall Apart? | Co.Design.

Enhanced by Zemanta
April 12th, 2009

The Destruction of Heterosexual Marriage is caused by….

It’s not homosexuals, gay marriage, or polygamy, but by the lack of God and godly things inside the marriage. It’s the lack of understanding of what marriage really is – and it is not a unit of two individuals living two separate and distinct lives. Nor is it a lordly man and a slave of a wife.

Wb Moore has posted an excellent series on marriage this past week, which I urge you take a good gander at.

It can be found here.

October 13th, 2008

What has God got to do with it? – The Osteens As Spiritual Midgets

via Beliefwatch: The Osteens As Spiritual Midgets | Newsweek BeliefWatch: Lisa Miller | Newsweek.com

What’s God Got to Do With It?

Her relationship advice is retrograde dross. Submit to your man, or at least pretend, and then do what you want.

Lisa Miller
NEWSWEEK
From the magazine issue dated Oct 20, 2008

In her new book, “Love Your Life,” Victoria Osteen tells the following story. When she and her husband, Joel, were courting, he came over to her house for dinner. She knew he was the son of a prominent Houston pastor and she, a nice Christian girl, was hoping they could talk about Scripture while she prepared the meal. “Joel began flipping through the pages, but before long, he put the Bible down,” she wrote. Victoria was disappointed and complained, “I thought you’d be a spiritual giant.”

“Joel said nothing and just grinned at me as we carried on with the evening.” Later, he joked with friends that she’d called him a “spiritual midget.”

With that story, Victoria unconsciously articulates the problem so many outsiders have with Joel and, by extension, with her. Joel Osteen is one of the most popular pastors in the country, but both he and Victoria seem, from the outside at least, to be spiritual midgets. More than 40,000 people come to hear them preach each week in a sanctuary that used to be the home of the Houston Rockets. Millions more watch them on television. Joel’s books are best sellers, and Victoria’s new one, though arriving in stores this week, is already high on Amazon’s spiritual book list. But the theology driving all this success is thin. Over and over, in sermons, books and television interviews, the Osteens repeat their most firmly held beliefs. If you pray to Jesus, you’ll get what you want. In a conversation with NEWSWEEK, Victoria defines her Christian belief this way. Religion “is about appreciating what God’s given us. He’s given us this life, and he wants us to live it to the fullest.” (I interviewed her early one morning when the stock market had already plunged 200 points, and she referred to a recent sermon of Joel’s in which he said people were like palm trees: “We have a bounce back on the inside of us.” That seemed an inane sort of comfort.)

Prosperity preachers are neither new nor unique in America, but the Osteens’ version seems especially self-serving. Victoria’s book betrays her interest in the kind of small gratifications that rarely extend to other people, let alone to the larger world. She recommends that women take “me time” every day, and indulge occasionally in a (fat-free!) ice cream. She writes repeatedly about her love for the gym. Her relationship advice is retrograde dross: submit to your man, or at least pretend you’re submitting, and then do what you want anyway. “I know if I just wait long enough,” she writes, “eventually my idea will become Joel’s idea, and it will come to pass.” When I asked her how she kept her two children interested in church, she answered that even though they were a broccoli and lean-meats household, she gave them doughnuts as a special treat on Sundays. All this is fine, in the pages of a women’s magazine or a self-help book. But what has God got to do with it?

Perhaps this discomfort with the Osteens’ message is what drove all the media attention over the summer. In August, Victoria was the defendant in a lawsuit alleging that she struck a Continental Airlines flight attendant after that flight attendant refused to mop up a spill on Victoria’s first-class seat. (Osteen had already paid a $3,000 fine to the FAA.) Osteen was acquitted, and some members of the jury said they thought the suit was frivolous, but on the Internet, at least, the story played badly. Secular observers call her a “diva,” and conservative Christian detractors call her (and her husband) “heretics.” (“You know what?” Victoria says, “I don’t read that stuff, I truly don’t.”) Victoria says she’s happy and relieved the suit is behind her. And in fairness to her, the anecdote in her book concludes by saying that Joel was, in fact, the furthest thing from a spiritual midget. “He had read his Bible every day since he was a little boy and knew more about Scripture than I ever imagined,” she wrote.

September 4th, 2008

The Prevenient Grace of my Life

Prevenient grace is divine grace which precedes human decision. It exists prior to and without reference to anything humans may have done. As humans are corrupted by the effects of sin, prevenient grace allows persons to engage their God-given free will to choose the salvation offered by God in Jesus Christ or to reject that salvific offer.

Looking back upon my relatively short life of 30 years, I can point to a time when even as a sinner, the grace of God was my support. It has led me to a strong belief in prevenient grace, or in the language of the modern vulgar, the preceding grace. Yes, this preceding grace allows for God to call the sinner, but it is more than that, it a grace that lifts a sinner to the light of the gospel of Jesus Christ, often times giving the sinner support and surrounding him in preparation of the love of Jesus Christ.

It is this type of grace that uplifted me in during the latter half of 1995. I was 17 then, living in Mississippi with my grandfather – my mother unable to take care of even herself due to alcoholism. On June 23rd of that year, at approximately 2 in the afternoon, I found my grandfather dead, and he had been some time since he had been missing since before dawn. I cannot express to you the love and appreciation that I have for my grandfather that I have to even this day. He was a solid force in my life and even today I think about my short time with him.

I was sitting in Church on Saturday night just a few Months later on September 16th listening to a minister. For the life of me, I cannot remember the sermon, but I do remember thinking to myself that if my mother would but her that message, she would give up her sinful life, which by this time was consumed by alcohol and drugs, and really make a start for God. You see, it was just a few days before that I had told my mother that due to her constant let downs, her constant lies, and her life, I wished nothing else to do with her – going so far as tell her in my triumphant and condescending 17 year old voice that the next time she saw me would be at her funeral and she would lucky if I showed up. That Saturday afternoon, again about 2pm, she crossed the yellow line, killing not just herself, but another person as well. See, I didn’t know this as I sat there listening to that sermon about the need for God and praying that I would have a chance to tell my mother about it, praying that she would listen this time. It was not until about 9pm that I was told by my then pastor’s wife who had helped to raise me almost from my birth.

Then, in December of that year, my then-pastor’s wife was overtaken and destroyed in her battle with cancer. That pastor did not believe in doctors, so for the months, possibly years, that she was being eaten up inside, everyone simply thought that she would get better. By the time that someone finally took her to the hospital, it was too late. She passed quietly from this world in the middle of December. She had always been there for me, and had through her pain comforted me through the death of my grandfather and my mother. A few years before she could see that I was sick and invited me to stay at their house for the night. The next morning, I awoke to a feverish day. Unbeknown to anyone but me, and now you, she took me to town to get me some Tylenol, facing the wrath of her husband, because she felt that common sense easily went along with faith.

It was the previous year that I was fortunate enough to spend some time with my grandfather’s sister, my Aunt. We talked for a long time, and as we shared a few things she shared with me the single most important Psalm to her. It had helped her through life’s troubles many times.

To the chief Musician, A Psalm of David.

O LORD, thou hast searched me, and known me. Thou knowest my downsitting and mine uprising, thou understandest my thought afar off. Thou compassest my path and my lying down, and art acquainted with all my ways. For there is not a word in my tongue, but, lo, O LORD, thou knowest it altogether. Thou hast beset me behind and before, and laid thine hand upon me. Such knowledge is too wonderful for me; it is high, I cannot attain unto it. Whither shall I go from thy spirit? or whither shall I flee from thy presence? If I ascend up into heaven, thou art there: if I make my bed in hell, behold, thou art there. If I take the wings of the morning, and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea; Even there shall thy hand lead me, and thy right hand shall hold me. If I say, Surely the darkness shall cover me; even the night shall be light about me. Yea, the darkness hideth not from thee; but the night shineth as the day: the darkness and the light are both alike to thee. For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother’s womb. I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well. My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth. Thine eyes did see my substance, yet being unperfect; and in thy book all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned, when as yet there was none of them. How precious also are thy thoughts unto me, O God! how great is the sum of them! If I should count them, they are more in number than the sand: when I awake, I am still with thee. Surely thou wilt slay the wicked, O God: depart from me therefore, ye bloody men. For they speak against thee wickedly, and thine enemies take thy name in vain. Do not I hate them, O LORD, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee? I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies. Search me, O God, and know my heart: try me, and know my thoughts: And see if there be any wicked way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting.

As I set there and read that, I thought that it was a decent Psalm, really paying no attention to it until the time that I needed it. With each death, and with each reading, that Psalm provided me with strength and knowledge that no matter how bad it was, God was still there. There were times that it seemed that I had made my bed in hell while other times I prayed that I would wake up from the horrible nightmare that had suddenly become my life. No, it was not like my life was all that easy before, but this year, well, this year had shaken me, and often times, even now, I still wonder how I made it through.

There were times after the deaths that life got pretty difficult, and often times I wish that God would have taken the other parent. Often times, during that time, I would wish that God would simply have taken me. But, He took me by the hand and led me to a place of rest. I was serving Him, but I know some of the Truth, some bit about God. I was still a sinner and need of His Grace, but so many times through that horrible years and subsequent years, there was a preceding Grace calling me unto Him, leading me and protecting me.

I still was able to get into plenty of trouble, plenty of heartaches, and plenty of sorrow, but I can stand here today and turning around, see God’s grace calling me to Him.

I realize that this is not a normal post on this blog, but it is still my blog and I am still finding it’s voice. Grace is what Jesus Christ brought first of all – not doctrine. His first call was for repentance, not for theological discussion. He sought to bring the very words of Life to the sinners, not to debate bible version. He called the false prophets out, but in doing so, He protected the sheep from their venom. He taught grace and truth and brought to people God. This man Christ Jesus was rewarded for His efforts with the cross, the needed sacrifice that would truly bring us grace, but before that He had spent at least 3 years imparting to the Apostles a preceding grace and lifted them out of Judaism and the dead vine until they were ready for the Day.

For so long in my life, I have subsisted on nothing but the grace of God and have subsisted because of the Grace of God. It is by His hand that I have beed led safe thus far and it is because of this grace, that I at the perfect time found the call to repentance only natural, and so very sweet. I have let my God down many times, and most likely will do so a few more times, but I know that He is always there, and He has never let me down.

I thank my God for His Grace, for His mercy, and for His patience as I travel along.

September 4th, 2008

Text Of Dr. Deborah Pitt’s Reply To Archbishop Rowan Williams

I am not a part of the Church of England; however, knowing the history of that denomination it bewilders me, and disgusts me, to see it falling for the lie that is homosexuality.

I found this letter floating in cyberspace and throughly enjoyed it, so I have posted it here. Dr. Pitt approaches the Archbishop of Canterbury with more grace than I would have, and yet she gets her point across.

Stand Firm | Text Of Dr. Deborah Pitt’s Reply To Archbishop Rowan Williams.

Read the rest of this entry »

September 2nd, 2008

A miracle, not a scandal

Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and comes down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no variation or shadow of turning. James 1:17 NKJV

I have made a point of not revealing my politics on this blog, and I intend to keep it that way; however, the recent news that the daughter of the Republican Vice-Presidential candidate is pregnant goes beyond that of politics, and reaches into the hearts, or should, of people.

I have seen articles from every angle – abortion, pro-life, teen pregnancy, condemnation, and praise. This is not a left or right issue, but a family issue.

My own daughter was born out of wedlock. I sinned. I did not make a mistake. My daughter is not a mistake. My child, like all children, are born in sin, and is no better and no worse than any other child that is born. The daughter of Gov. Palin is not a political scandal, not a talking point, and really is none of people’s business. I am not a Republican or a political pundit, but I am a parent, and further I was a sinner who sinned just as Bristol Palin has done. I am forgiven now, and she may be as well, but that is really between her and her God.

People are calling this child a mistake, a scandal, a lie, a political issue. This is a child – a human life, a sacred soul that will be need of salvation as well. I hope that people follow Sen. Obama’s advice, as well as those of many others, to leave the families out of it. There is no need to defend Bristol, or Gov. Palin, because in the end, this child will bring into this world another child. She needs the help of the world and the prayers of the Saints. I for one will be praying for this young family.

A miracle, not a scandal – The Augusta Chronicle.

Read the rest of this entry »

August 22nd, 2008

Nebraska Safe-Haven Law Permits Parents to Abandon Teens

Nebraska Safe-Haven Law Permits Parents to Abandon Teens – Local News | News Articles | National News | US News.

Nebraska Safe-Haven Law Permits Parents to Abandon Teens

Friday , August 22, 2008

AP

Nebraska’s new safe-haven law allowing parents to abandon unwanted children at hospitals with no questions asked is unique in a significant way: It goes beyond babies and potentially permits the abandonment of anyone under 19.

While lawmakers may not have intended it, the month-old law raises the possibility that frustrated parents could drop off misbehaving teens or even severely disabled older children with impunity.

“Whether the kid is disabled or unruly or just being a hormonal teenager, the state is saying: ‘Hey, we have a really easy option for you,”‘ said Adam Pertman, executive director of a New York adoption institute and a frequent critic of safe-haven laws.

Nebraska’s approach is surprising because it is the last state in the nation to adopt a safe-haven law.

But instead of following the lead of other states, which focus on the abandonment of newborns, lawmakers here wanted to extend the protection to all minors. And in Nebraska, that goes all the way up to age 19.

“All children deserve our protection,” said Sen. Tom White, who helped broaden the measure. “If we save one child from being abused, it’s well, well worth it.”

White said it doesn’t matter if that child is an infant or three years old or in the care of a parent or baby sitter. As for what constitutes a minor, he refers to common law, which interprets it to be anyone under age 14.

State Sen. Arnie Stuthman, who introduced the original bill dealing only with infants, agreed to the compromise after the bill became stalled in debate.

“The main interest I have is that it gives the mother or a parent another option of what to do with a child before they do something drastic,” he said.

The measure, which took effect July 18, does not absolve people of possible criminal charges — for example, if a child had been beaten.

And since the law does not specify, it technically allows anyone, not just a parent, to legally surrender custody. Most other states narrowly define the role of the person surrendering the child.

Some hospitals have fielded questions from the public about the law, but no children have been dropped off.

“I hope there never is one,” Stuthman said.

Pertman, who directs the New York-based Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute, said his research going back several years shows safe-haven laws are not accomplishing what they intended. Women who are distressed enough to want to abandon their children are not the ones reading billboards or getting the message about these laws, he said.

Pertman finds Nebraska’s law particularly alarming because it is not focused on infants and parents.

Casting such a wide net “circumvents every rational practice in child welfare that I’m aware of,” he said. “That’s as nicely as I can put it.”

California, for example, allows parents to legally abandon a child at a hospital or other designated safe zones within 72 hours of birth.

The brevity of the law could trigger litigation over its meaning, said Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor.

“This law is obviously written in almost skeletal form,” he said. “Drafters will sometimes try to say as little as possible so they don’t create ambiguity, but drafters here succeeded in writing the law in such a limited fashion that the entire provision is ambiguous.”

Nebraska lawmakers acknowledge the courts will have to sort out the details, and they have said they are open to revisiting the legislation if necessary.

The Nebraska Hospital Association has been working to help its 85 member hospitals statewide establish procedures for dealing with abandonment cases.

Sen. Ernie Chambers, who voted against the law, said he would prefer to address the reasons that parents abandon their children rather than offer them safe haven.

“I don’t think such laws are wise,” he said.

Kathy Bigsby Moore, executive director of the child advocacy group Voices for Children in Nebraska, said she also worries how the law might affect adoption rates.

“The sad thing is we have plenty of other mechanisms for people to use,” she said. “I’m not sure the safe-haven law is really going to help in a majority of cases.”

August 18th, 2008

Emulation: The Proper Place for Adoration

A few weeks ago, we had a fete for our Pastor’s wife who recently turned **. During the moments of thanks, a speak spoke about emulation, of emulation not only the Pastor, but his wife as well, and their marriage, when in some small way was being celebrated there as well. I know that the speaker could not go into emulation on that day, and that is fine for him, but I have been mediating upon emulation for a bit now.

Some define emulation as a mimic, or as the ambition to follow after one, or to excel. Emulation is easily meant to follow so closely after one, or to seek to build upon the successes of another. Both definitions are adequate. And in turning to the Scriptures, we find a command to watch closely those that follow Christ, to imitate them.

Be imitators of me, brothers and sisters, and watch carefully those who are living this way, just as you have us as an example.
(Php 3:17 NET)

Paul commands us thrice to ‘be followers’ of him. Paul’s reasoning is sound each time. If he is a follower of Christ, then if we imitate him, then we too will be followers of Christ. This is not to say that we must copy Paul’s actions and thereby be saved, instead, we learn from his manner of life and in following that, we learn about the Christian life.

Our pastor and his wife have been married for over 40 years. Yes, there have been hard times, no doubt, and yes, they have seen good times. They did not marry within the Church, only later coming to be found by God, so they did not have the foundation of holiness and the examples of saintly marriages. Yet, upon coming to God, they began to adopt certain aspects of the writers of the New Testament and those living examples set so rightly before them. In their own pastor, no doubt, did they find someone worth emulating.

It is the same for anyone who really sits under a pastor. If that pastor is a follower of Christ, then that pastor will have a life that is worth emulating. I wrestled with Paul’s commandment in 1st Corinthians 11.1, which should conclude the previous chapter. I wrestled with a meaning that fits the words. In my understanding, I can hear Paul telling us through the Corinthians to be followers of Paul in every way that he is a follower of Christ. Would Paul have meant that we must all be tent-makers? That is a difficult assumption at best. However, could Paul not have rather intended for the Saint to live a life of missionary service, even in a stationary posting, such as Paul lived? Ready to die for Christ, counting all things lost for Christ?

Did he wish everyone to develop the temper of himself? Or would he have rather us devote ourselves to living in peace with all men. Surely, he would have had us to stand firm for the Church, but it is easily recognized that Paul was somewhat harsh in his dealings with those seeking schism.

When I think of our pastor, I simply do not see a perfect man, nor his wife as a perfect woman; instead, I see perfected saints. I see a marriage that was withstood great change in the outside world, inside the Church, and yet, through the years, there is no doubt held by anyone that they dearly and wonderfully love each other. Yet, the marriage is not a perfect fit for everyone; however, it is a perfect example for all. In our emulation of them, we strive for the marriage that they have, seeking, however, to apply their examples to our lives but increase upon it.

When I first met my pastor, he said that his desire for his ministers was for them to excel and to be successful. Is this not a fatherly sentiment as well? Do we fathers really want our children to sit in our shadow or do we wish for them to take the best part of us and build upon it? Of course we want our children to use us as stepping stones!

This to is the sentiment of the Christian. We stand on the shoulders that come before us. We see the greatness in the lives of those that surround us, and like a buffet of character, we take those things that are right within us, and use those things to build our own life. We take the examples of sturdy marriages from a generation ago and digest the fruits thereof and use that nutrition as a foundation to model (not copy completely) our own marriages on.

We emulate our pastor and his wife, not in every way, but in every way in which they follow Christ.

July 31st, 2008

"Part of the Life Course?" Cohabitation in Contemporary America

“Part of the Life Course?” Cohabitation in Contemporary America.

The U.S. Census Bureau has just reported that cohabitation among heterosexual couples has hit record numbers as living together — as opposed to getting married — becomes more and more mainstream.

USA Today provides extensive reporting on this issue, along with analysis that seems to celebrate this development.

In one article, “Census Reports More Unmarried Couples Living Together,” the paper provides a summary of the findings. As the paper reports:

The number of opposite-sex couples who live together, less than a million 30 years ago, hit 6.4 million in 2007, show federal data released Monday. Cohabiting couples now make up almost 10% of all opposite-sex U.S. couples, married and unmarried.

That’s up from 2006, when the Census bureau reported 5 million unmarried, opposite-sex households. But that figure was based on a question that some respondents might have found unclear.

The important shift is not found between 2006 and 2007, but between 1977 and 2007. Just thirty years ago cohabitation was rare and marriage was the norm for heterosexual couples. All that has seemingly changed.

Nevertheless, the other side of the story was downplayed. If cohabitating couples make up “almost 10%” of heterosexual couples, then marriage is still very much the norm. In fact, the American numbers on marriage are much different than those found in many European nations, where the percentages of unmarried couples living together is much higher. The resilience of marriage is a big part of this story, but that fact doesn’t provide much headline fodder.

The paper also suggested that the true figures concerning cohabitation are obscured by the fact that many couples who are currently married had previously cohabitated. One researcher cited by the paper suggested that the American pattern of cohabitation is more of a life stage than a permanent lifestyle.

Sociologist Linda Waite of the University of Chicago “says living together in the USA isn’t very stable or long-term, compared to some Scandinavian countries where it’s more likely to be a long-term committed relationship.” She said that in America cohabitation is “part of the life course.” As she explained: “It’s something people do that leads to somewhere,” she says. “If it doesn’t lead to marriage, it leads to splitsville.”

USA Today also provided an analysis article, “Living Together No Longer ‘Playing House.’” In this article, Sharon Jayson argues that cohabitation has been falsely blamed for later marital problems and breakups. As she introduced her article:

A generation ago, unmarried couples who lived together were often derided for “shacking up” or “playing house.” Studies in the 1980s supported those negative stereotypes, suggesting that cohabitation could doom a long-term relationship, substantially raising the risk of divorce.

While researchers say the overall divorce rate is higher among those who lived together before marriage, now they don’t blame cohabitating.

As Pamela Smock, a sociologist at the Population Studies Center at the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, suggested, “There’s been a sea change in societal, cultural and individual acceptance of cohabitation.”

More from her article:

“The nature of cohabitation has changed,” says Jay Teachman, a sociology professor at Western Washington University in Bellingham. “Cohabitators 20 years ago were the rule breakers, the rebels, the risk takers — the folks who were perhaps not as interested in marriage, and using cohabitation as an alternative to marriage.”

“Twenty or 25 years ago, if you were cohabiting and then married them, the marriage was more likely to dissolve and end in divorce,” he says. “Today, that’s not the case. You can cohabit with your spouse and not experience increased risk of divorce. We’re making these finer distinctions that we didn’t make before.”

In an interesting twist, one researcher argued that cohabitating couples should be seen as “a family form in its own right,” as completely distinct from marriage. USA Today rounded out its reporting with a poll. As the paper reported its findings:

Most people today reject the notion that couples who live together before marriage are more likely to get divorced, finds a weekend USA TODAY/Gallup Poll of 1,007 adults.

Almost half (49%) said living together makes divorce less likely; 13% said it makes no difference. Just 31% said living together first makes divorce more likely; 7% had no opinion.

The fascinating aspect of this poll is the very fact that the paper thought that a poll would be valuable.  The poll actually reveals nothing about the actual impact of cohabitation on marriage, but only on what people think about the impact of cohabitation.

Once all this is put together, a portrait of a changing America comes into view.  The most significant data reveals the incredible cultural shift on cohabitation since the late 1970s.  The larger picture concerning marriage would have to include the impact of so-called “no-fault” divorce laws that became widespread during the same period.

Even as marriage is still the norm, increasing numbers of heterosexual couples are cohabitating before, if not instead of, marrying.  The Census Bureau reports statistics, but the more urgent dimension of this development is moral.  The subversion of marriage comes at great cost, even if couples do not experience what they describe as trauma or trouble.  The reality of sexual intimacy outside of marriage always comes with a moral and spiritual cost, but this is rejected by a culture in denial.

For many, cohabitation is now just “part of the life course.”

July 29th, 2008

Hundreds of Worldwide Marriage Encounter Couples Sign Proclamation Supporting a Lifetime Commitment to Marriage

Hundreds of Worldwide Marriage Encounter Couples Sign Proclamation Supporting a Lifetime Commitment to Marriage – Christian Newswire.

Seriously, I thought that the marriage vows said before God and family was commitment enough for the couple. Doesn’t signing the banner demote the idea the wedding vows as the lifetime commitment?

Personally, I think people will sign just about thing to make themselves feel better. I wonder how many of those 850 couples will be married next year, in 5 years, in 10?

July 27th, 2008

It's Sunday morning…so what?

Yes, we can take that attitude. I mean, sure some of us get one day off and really should stay home and rest up or clean up, or relax or something besides go to Church. Just because we are told not to stop assembling ourselves together, well, who really cares about what the Apostle Paul said anyway, it’s not like he had to work 6 days a week or get up early and work until the wee hours of the night.

And besides, Church really doesn’t matter anyway, right? Sure, since the very beginning of Christianity, Christians have met on the frist day of the week to worship and praise their God. No need to follow tradition, you know, even if this tradition is backed up by examples in Scripture and that little diddy from Christ about where two or three are gathered together in His name.

And other thing, Sunday is a pagan day, who really cares if the truth of the matter is that early Christians celebrated every First Day as the day that Christ rose from the grave. I mean, that was 2000 years ago and all.

And if you have to drive…well, the gas prices are just too high and no one would expect you to spend 8 bucks or so just to go to Church. Instead, go to the mall today and hang out with friends. Maybe go to Wal-mart or K-mart.

Besides, Church is filled with a bunch of hypocrites anyway. Have you ever thought that you might just be too perfect to go to church with a  bunch of sinners and hypocrites? I mean, some don’t even shake your hand. Your pastor might not care much for you, never calls, never visits, never lets your sing or lead testimony. What about that Brother or Sister who you can’t stand for various reasons. They might be there and you know, all you would do is to spend the entire service planning what you would say to them if you given half a chance. Boy, would it be good too. You could cut them low and deep. I mean, sure, you shouldn’t go for the attention or to be liked by others, after all it really is God’s house anyway, but you need friends right? So, go to the mall or somewhere with your friends.

But, now, I mean this, if you feel like you absolutely have to go to Church this morning, here are some that I recommend.