Unsettled Christianity

One blog to rule them all, One blog to find them, One blog to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
July 23rd, 2010

Was there always an orthodoxy?

Dr. Sara Parvis is a scholar of a theological hero of mine, Marcellus of Ancrya (some day, I’ll get that book), and cannot wait for her next publication in this area. For now, it’ll suffice reading occasional blogposts,

That key question, for example: was there an ‘orthodox’ Christianity before Constantine?

There are at least two ways of answering ‘yes’ to that question (I’ll leave it to others to consider how many ways there are of answering ‘no’). One is to say that it was always clear what Christians should rightly teach about Christ.

via Patristics and Christian Origins « Centre for the Study of Christian Origins.

One of the paradoxes which I see is that those who came long before 325 or 381, would they be considered orthodox? Hardly, if one followed closely to it. Further, biblically speaking, should there have been developed orthodoxy or is that a part of the developed orthopraxy… and what if modern scholarship shows that developed theology is dramatically different from the earliest Christian communities?

February 9th, 2010

Heresy and Salvation – Join the Conversation

I saw this post this past week, found myself in general agreement and moved on:

Read the rest of this entry »

October 26th, 2009

To Study History Is To Become Catholic?

To know history is also to become Catholic. We, along with the Orthodox are the only Churches that stretch right back to Christ and the Apostles. The true faith has literally been handed from the apostles to their successors the bishops through the laying on of hands. We have a living Tradition of cherished teachings and memories going back to Christ himself.

via To Study History Is To Become Catholic | Archdiocese of Washington.

Note also here.

October 14th, 2009

Orthodox Chancellor Blasts Liberals, Anglican Dean Upholds Faith

Before anyone misunderstands, the ‘Liberals’ are those of liberal theology,

Speaking at the afternoon session of “In the Footsteps of Grafton and Tikhon”, the Very Rev. Chad Hatfield, Chancellor of St. Vladimir’s Seminary, ripped into liberal theological training. He was followed by Fr. Robert Munday, Dean of Nashotah House Seminary, who gave an uncompromising defense of the Church’s teaching on Faith, Order and Morals.

Read the rest of this entry »

March 2nd, 2009

Knowing the Christian God

More often than not, it seems, those that profess Christianity and adhere to the Christian God go one to claim that ‘knowing’ God comes through personal experience. My stance is that if you claim to know the Christian God, and further claim the name of Christian, then you must know Him fully through the Scriptures which tell of the Christian God. I have not yet had the time to write anything, so when I across this article, I found it well worth the read.

I believe that to know the God of the Bible, one must have more then an impression through personal experience. They must have a personal encounter through the miracle of God’s call. (But it does not end there)

This post is for discussion.

Introduction

The Argument

This essay demonstrates an if-then proposition: If God is the God of orthodox Christian theology, then God can only be known in a miraculous encounter. The essay begins with an assumption. It does not prove its premise, the existence of God as defined by the trinitarian and incarnational propositions of the Creeds. The first step is to define “miraculous encounter.”

Read the rest of this entry »

February 17th, 2009

Orthodoxy and Orthopraxy: Biblical, Extra-Biblical, and Unbiblical

Now these things, brethren, I have figuratively transferred to myself and Apollos for your sakes, that you may learn in us not to think beyond what is written, that none of you may be puffed up on behalf of one against the other. (1 Corinthians 4:6 NKJV)

I measure everything doctrinal by what has been written by the Apostles and Prophets. For me, there are two categories of doctrine, biblical and unbiblical, or orthodox and unorthodox, true and false. We are told several times to hold to the doctrine of the Church as taught by the Apostles, and I can find no ability in those words to expand or develop doctrine beyond that which was found in the 1st century Church.

However, the practices – orthopraxy – of the Church fall into three categories:

  • Biblical
  • Extrabiblical
  • Unbiblical

We are commanded two sacraments in the New Testament, baptism and the Eucharist, but beyond that and the use of psalms and hymns in worshiping God (Ephesians 5.19; Colossians 3.16; James 5.13) and the fact that the first day of the week was the meeting day (Acts 20.7; 1st Corinthians 16.2), there is very little to nothing else to guide the Christian in daily or weekly ritual life.

A few decades after John had written Revelation, Pliny the Younger wrote,

They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food–but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.

We know that the Church had a certain and fixed day to meet together, and that they had somewhat of a normal routine, at least those under the persecution of Pliny the Younger. Somehow, they had developed practices not found in the bible.

Recently, I have heard that the idea of an ‘altar call’ ‘cannot be found in the bible.’ Technically that is true, and I will not devote myself to defending the ‘altar call’ usually given at the end of a service in which the sinners,  the wayward, or needy are invited to come to the altar; yet, I will post the biblically example that I have seen of what we might call an altar call:

“Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ.”

Now when they heard this, they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Men and brethren, what shall we do?”

Then Peter said to them, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is to you and to your children, and to all who are afar off, as many as the Lord our God will call.”

And with many other words he testified and exhorted them, saying, “Be saved from this perverse generation.” Then those who gladly received his word were baptized; and that day about three thousand souls were added to them. (Acts 2:36-41 NKJV)

Peter finished his sermon, and the question was asked – what do we do now? Peter answered, and those that had received his word, came forward. Granted, it may not be a ‘traditional’ altar call, but in the end, it has all the hallmarks of one.

But the question is, is the Church allowed to practice something godly that is not in the bible. We return to those three concepts. Biblical are those things, such as the sacraments, which are mandated in the bible, yet for baptism, we do not find the prohibition against baptismal founts or the need for only running water. We just see the command. The same is said for the Eucharist. We do not know the exact ceremony but we know that it is commanded. Extrabiblical are those things that we develop to carry on those commands, such as baptismal founts for baptism. Unbiblical might be a different formula or requirements of the baptismal candidate that is not found in Scripture which would prevent the baptism from being carried out.

I have been thinking, of course, of those other things that we do which are not exactly found in the bible, but are either used or practiced in our congregations today. Here is a short list:

  • Revival, tent or otherwise
  • Musical Instruments
  • King James Only, or even English Translations
  • Electricity
  • Sunday School classes
  • Youth leaders, ministers, or any other ‘ministers’ not found in Eph. 4.11
  • Many forms of Church Government employed today
  • Programs
  • Special Songs
  • Youth Camps

Granted, that is a short list of things not found in the bible – yet we do these things on a regular and traditional basis. If we can do these things, surely, we can understand that an altar call is not unbiblical but extrabiblical, and that it is a practise developed over time and culture.

As a rejoinder to this, let me state first, that the altar call is not the point of the service, nor should people be expected to wait until the end of the service to pray to or to seek God. There are times when saints need to be shaken away from their extrabiblical concepts, but we must remember, extrabiblical is not unbiblical.