Unsettled Christianity

One blog to rule them all, One blog to find them, One blog to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
February 21st, 2012

Franklin Graham commits Hypocrisy in 3…2…1…

When pressed about the President’s Christianity (honestly, which is that line of reasoning going to stop…) Graham says that he can’t answer for anyone… and they he is asked about Rick Santorum, and suddenly, he is the Magisterium:

“All I know is I’m a sinner, and God has forgiven me of my sins… you have to ask every person,” he said about whether he could say for sure that Obama is indeed of the Christian faith.

However, when asked about GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum’s religion, Graham gave a much more concrete answer.

“I think so,” Graham said when asked if he believes Santorum is a Christian. “His values are so clear on moral issues. No question about it… I think he’s a man of faith.”

And then, about Newt:

But Graham was more willing to label Newt Gingrich’s faith. “Newt’s been married several times… but he could make a good candidate,” Graham said. “I think Newt is a Christian. At least he told me he is.”

via Franklin Graham Calls Obama’s Religious Beliefs Into Question.

I really wish Franklin would need the words of his father,

Yes, of course. I’d spend more time at home with my family, and I’d study more and preach less. I wouldn’t have taken so many speaking engagements, including some of the things I did over the years that I probably didn’t really need to do—weddings and funerals and building dedications, things like that. Whenever I counsel someone who feels called to be an evangelist, I always urge them to guard their time and not feel like they have to do everything.

I also would have steered clear of politics. I’m grateful for the opportunities God gave me to minister to people in high places; people in power have spiritual and personal needs like everyone else, and often they have no one to talk to. But looking back I know I sometimes crossed the line, and I wouldn’t do that now.

Enhanced by Zemanta
February 1st, 2012

Trump to endorse Newt Gingrich

Oh good… Gingrich is set to be endorsed by Trump.

Sources tell the 8 News NOW I-Team Trump will endorse Newt Gingrich.

According to Trump advisor Michael Cohen, “Donald J. Trump will be making a major announcement tomorrow at 12:30 p.m. at Trump International Hotel & Tower, Las Vegas, Nevada… The announcement will pertain to the Presidential race.”

This is a hoot.

First Cain and then Trump….

Cain, Trump and Newt… what is the common denominator?

Egos and problems with women.

Oh.the.joy.

Enhanced by Zemanta
January 24th, 2012

Wait… constantly cheating on your wife makes you normal?

This is the actual interview which Newt Gingrich had with David Brody:

David Brody: I’m curious; when I talk to evangelicals they bring up the word forgiveness. They say you know what, the media wants to bash you for the past, for some of the marital issues of the past, but yet, when I talk to evangelicals, they’re like been there, done that, regarding forgiveness. And that is very important. What does that say to you? The sentiment of forgiveness from evangelicals?

Newt Gingrich: Well, I think it’s important. It’s also important that they recognize that I have not hidden from the facts of my life, that I have confessed my weaknesses, and that I have had to go to God for forgiveness and for reconciliation. And I think most people can identify, either with themselves or with loved ones, that life has moments that are very sad, you wish wouldn’t have occurred. And you look back on them and you seek forgiveness for not having done everything you could have.

So, I think in that sense, it may make me more normal than somebody who wanders around seeming perfect and maybe not understanding the human condition, and the challenges of life for normal people.

Normal people have weaknesses – yes. Normal people, however, do not cheat on their dying first wife or their life-long diseased second wife while seemingly asking her for an open marriage. I don’t get this…

Has the Republican Party just completely given up the facade of the party of public values?

And yet the man who is faithfully married to the same women for years, two wonderful and happy daughters…that is the great moral menace?

Enhanced by Zemanta
January 21st, 2012

“President Newt Gingrich” #NSFA – Not Safe for America

As you know by now… Newt Gingrich as won the South Carolina Republican Primary. Only about 7% of South Carolinians voted in this primary. This is pitiful. Sad. This is why we cannot do much in this country.

I love this little pic:

Imagine if we voted like we whined?

Anyway… tonight, the party that has preached family values and the moral character of a candidate simply turned a hypocritical eye and, at least in South Carolina, voted for Newt Gingrich who has used every known card in the past few weeks to gin up votes for himself. As Jim notes, this is, well, actions of reprobates. As Tim noted earlier this week, a worldview matters. I agree… Brian is questioning whether or not a candidate’s sexual ethics should play a part in our choosing of them. Newt’s ethics, which are none, relies on one simple principle: What is best for him. He is like a baby, in that what he wants, he must have. He uses things to get other things. While indiscretions are one thing, for Newt, there is a solid pattern seen in his life. He ditches what is no longer desirable to him, and seeks to trade up, even if that means breaking some of the most sacred vows that one can take. There is a difference between humans being humans and a man who has built his entire life on the use and abuse of others to profit himself.

By the way, look at Bob’s post.

There are two Republican candidates which I wish could have been in South Carolina. One is Jon Huntsman while the other is Mitch Daniels. I’m not going to pretend that I am a Republican in any way, but I believe that in a contest between the current President and any of those two, the United States would win.

Enhanced by Zemanta
January 20th, 2012

Megachurch Pastor Jim Garlow endorses Newt Gingrich

 

This bothers me, a lot. This is the same Rev. Garlow who endorsed Glen Beckm by the way… Anyway, when pastors begin to expend their capital to publicly endorse candidates, we enter into a dangerous path. Issues, yes, but not candidates…

Enhanced by Zemanta
January 20th, 2012

Hey Newt, if Herman Cain isn’t Vice-Presidential material, you aren’t Presidential material

Newt let loose on the ‘liberal media elite’ because they dared ask him about his character… But, you know… that didn’t stop him from commenting on Herman Cain’s character and even dismissing Cain because of his issues as Vice-Presidential material:

TAPPER: Your friend Herman Cain who probably has had better months in his life, you have been through difficult political storms, what would your advice to him be and do you still think he would be on your short list for vice president?

GINGRICH: Well, I mean, my advice to Herman having lived through a lot of different experiences is he has to stop and open up his heart and he has to think very prayerfully about what he owes his own family and what he owes his own future. I don’t think any of the rest of us can tell him what he ought to do and I think he needs to deal with it and I don’t have any comment on Herman beyond that until he decides what he’s going to do.

TAPPER: Do you still he’s still vice presidential material?

GINGRICH: I think he’s a very fine person, but I think he’s got to sort through where he’s at. And that’s something that’s very personal and it’s something he and his family need to do together. (here)

Note as well that Gingrich as answered Fox News’s hosts and their questions… with the answer that his sins have made him a better sinner, um, politician.

Enhanced by Zemanta
January 20th, 2012

You only vote for Newt Gingrich if you like red meat

Watch this:

This is crazy. How often did Newt use federal tv to lambast Democrats and the President on a whole host of issues? Not only is this man a hypocrite, he is a blowhard, say-anything type of candidate.

The reason that many will vote for Newt is the myth of ‘fire in his belly.’ Look at the interview Newt’s ex-wife gave a few years ago. He has as a severe disconnect between personal and public… and all of those who say that a worldview matters and yet vote for Newt, they are hypocrites themselves.

If your own goal is to “beat Obama,” then you are a selfish individual. This idea that the President must be “beat” is silly. Either you can do a better job of being President, or not, but to run simply to beat someone shows your motivations…

The General Election with Obama V Gingrich is going to get ugly. It’s going to be a bar fight from Gingrich’s point of view and this country will not, will not move forward. We’ll go backwards.

Good luck with that, America.

Enhanced by Zemanta
January 19th, 2012

More Family Values Depravity – Does As I Say and Newt Gingrich

This is a repost from 2010… The news about the ex-wife is old…

Early in May, she went out to Ohio for her mother’s birthday. A day and a half went by and Newt didn’t return her calls, which was strange. They always talked every day, often ten times a day, so she was frantic by the time he called to say he needed to talk to her.

“About what?”

He wanted to talk in person, he said.

“I said, ‘No, we need to talk now.’ ”

He went quiet.

“There’s somebody else, isn’t there?”

She kind of guessed it, of course. Women usually do. But did she know the woman was in her apartment, eating off her plates, sleeping in her bed?

She called a minister they both trusted. He came over to the house the next day and worked with them the whole weekend, but Gingrich just kept saying she was a Jaguar and all he wanted was a Chevrolet. ” ‘I can’t handle a Jaguar right now.’ He said that many times. ‘All I want is a Chevrolet.’ ”

He asked her to just tolerate the affair, an offer she refused.

He’d just returned from Erie, Pennsylvania, where he’d given a speech full of high sentiments about compassion and family values.

The next night, they sat talking out on their back patio in Georgia. She said, “How do you give that speech and do what you’re doing?”

“It doesn’t matter what I do,” he answered. “People need to hear what I have to say. There’s no one else who can say what I can say. It doesn’t matter what I live.”

Read more: http://www.esquire.com/features/newt-gingrich-0910-8#ixzz0wFrl59FW

Newt was a long time favorite of mine (shocked, I know)…. I need to pick better political heroes, I reckon, or none at all.

Oh and I almost forgot – it is not the homosexuals destroying Traditional Marriage…

Enhanced by Zemanta
December 30th, 2011

Liberty University sorta but doesn’t promote Newt

Lovely…

A second major player in conservative circles, Liberty University, the evangelical institution founded by Jerry Falwell, is also giving Mr. Gingrich some help in Iowa, running 30-second commercials in which Mr. Gingrich extols the virtues of a Liberty education.

Neither video explicitly endorses Mr. Gingrich as the Republican nominee, but their pro-Gingrich messages raise a host of election law questions and highlight how loopholes in the law allow politically motivated groups to influence the outcome of elections. Liberty, a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization, is prohibited by law from participating in campaign activities on behalf of any candidate. Newsmax, a corporate entity, is also limited in its political activities but is now much freer to get involved since the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court case. (here)

Enhanced by Zemanta
December 18th, 2011

Looks like Newt learned his constitutional separation of powers doctrine from Lincoln

SCHIEFFER: Let me just ask you this and we’ll talk about enforcing it, because one of the things you say is that if you don’t like what a court has done, the congress should subpoena the judge and bring him before congress and hold a congressional hearing. Some people say that’s unconstitutional. But I’ll let that go for a minute.

I just want to ask you from a practical standpoint, how would you enforce that? Would you send the capital police down to arrest him?

GINGRICH: If you had to.

SCHIEFFER: You would?

GINGRICH: Or you instruct the Justice Department to send the U.S. Marshal. Let’s take the case of Judge Biery. I think he should be asked to explain a position that radical. How could he say he’s going to jail the superintendent over the word “benediction” and “invocation”? Because before you could — because I would then encourage impeachment, but before you move to impeach him you’d like to know why he said it.

Now clearly since the congress has….

SCHIEFFER: What if he didn’t come? What if he said no thank you I’m not coming?

GINGRICH: Well, that is what happens in impeachment cases. In an impeachment case, the House studies whether or not — the House brings them in, the House subpoenas them. As a general rule they show up.

I mean, you’re raising the core question — are judges above the rest of the constitution or are judges one of the three co-equal branches?

If you vote for Newt, I question the depth of your intelligence and love, not just for this country, but for humanity.

Let’s not forget that Newt, playing up the State’s Rights-Federalist position, clearly takes his doctrine of constitutionality from Lincoln who had no problem destroyed the separation of powers doctrine to fit his whim.

Newt will be Nixon on steroids.

Enhanced by Zemanta
December 10th, 2011

Newt’s Messiah Complex

During the 2008 election, the Right accused then Sen. Obama of having a Messiah complex. No. Wrong. This is a Messiah complex:

“I want to shift the entire planet he told the Washington Post as a Republican backbencher in 1985. “And I’m doing it.” Or, in another example from 1994: “I think I am a transformational figure. I think I am trying to effect a change so large that the people who would be hurt by the change, the liberal machine, have a natural reaction … I think because I’m so systematically purposeful about changing our world.” Another comment from that same year: “People like me are what stand between us and Auschwitz.” (here)