Unsettled Christianity

One blog to rule them all, One blog to find them, One blog to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
September 19th, 2011

It’s never been about owning them, but about faking them – Lead Codices

Okay, so if you make them, of course you own them, even if you claim that they are real, and are nothing but really fakes. This was just posted on the Lead Codices Facebook page. While they tried to remove pertinent contact points, the email is from Eversheds LPP.

The below email is from one of the leading law firms in London confirming ownership of the Jordan Codices by the Kingdom of Jordan.  This law firm has offices in Jordan, which have stated these articles. Furthermore the IAA (Israeli Antiquities Associates) has confirmed verbally and in writing that these items were smuggled across the border from Jordan to Israel and that therefore they are Jordanian.  We have posted this as a result of potential confusion that has arisen between certain parties.

—–Original Message—–

From:  [deleted]

Sent: 29 April 2009 16:46

To: [deleted]

Subject: RE: Jordanian Law – Ownership of Historic Artefacts

Mr. [deleted] Esq,

Please note that the Jordanian Law defines antiquity in Article 2/4 as in the following categories; Any object (movable or movable) related to science, arts, religious, manufacturer or tradition of previous cultures (mainly pre 1700), constructed or produced or modified. This could include objects of art, manuscripts, caves, coins, pottery, manuscript and others.

Human, plant and animal remains going back to a date earlier than the year A. D. 600.

Immovable antiquities are defined as connected to earth, whether constructed or buried including inland and territorial waters. While movable antiquities are disconnected from earth or from immovable antiquities.

Article 2/4/7/9 of The Antiquities Law no. 21 of 1988 provides;

7 - Antiquity:

A- Any object, whether movable of immovable, which has been constructed, shaped, inscribed, erected, excavated, or otherwise produced or modified by humankind earlier than the year 1750 A.D. including caves, sculpture, coins, pottery, manuscripts and all sorts of artefacts that indicate the rise and development of sciences, arts, manufactures, religions, and traditions relating to previous cultures, or any part added thereto, reconstructed or restored at a later date.

B- Any object, movable or immovable, as defined in the previous subsection referring to a date subsequent to the year 1750 A.D., which the Minister may declare to be antique by order published in the Official Gazette.

C- Human, plant and animal remains going back to a date earlier than the year 600 A.D.

10- Movable Antiquities:

Where the antiquities which are disconnected from the earth or from immovable antiquities and can be displaced without damaging it or damaging the antiquities linked therewith or the place where it was discovered.

12- Dealer:

Any person, whether natural or legal, who trades with antiquities.

In accordance with Articles 21, 26 of the Antiquities Law no. 21 of 1988, The government is the sole owner of immovable antiquities and ownership of movable antiquities is also governed by this law. The government required any person in possession of any antiquity object (which was permissible before 1976) to register their collection and if DoA did not buy it then it could remain in the possession of the owner, with no right to dispose of them except with the permission of  DoA.

Exchange & trade in Antiquities

Trading in Antiquities is forbidden in the Kingdom. The government required any person in possession of any antiquity object (which was permissible before 1976) to register their collection and if Department of Antiques did not buy it then it could remain in the possession of the owner, with no right to dispose of them except with the permission of DoA.

Export of movable antiquities is forbidden, subject to the approval of the Minister. In addition the right to lend, exchange or donate antiquities to official, educational institutions or museums is limited to the Council of Ministers, with certain conditions.

Article 5 provides;

A- The government shall be the sole owner of immovable antiquities and no other authority shall by any means whatsoever, appropriate these antiquities or raise any defenses against the State by way of right of ownership, prescription or other defenses.

B- Ownership of any movable antiquities, possession and disposition thereof shall be governed by the provisions of this law.

D- Ownership of the land does not vest its owner with the right to ownership of the antiquities existing thereon and therein, or disposing with it, and does not entitle him to excavate for antiquities therein.

E- The government may expropriate or buy any land or antiquity if it is in the interest of the Department to expropriate or buy it.

Article 21 provides;

All antiquities discovered during excavations carried out by any party shall be considered the property of the State. The Department may grant any licensed party some of the movable antiquities found in the excavation, in cases where other similar objects are found in the excavation where these were discovered, subject to the conditions and obligations imposed by the Department.

Article 23 provides

Trading in antiquities is forbidden in the Kingdom, and all trading licenses are considered canceled with the coming into force of this law.

Article 25 provides

A-    The Department may buy some of all of the antiquities in the

possession of the holder thereof, the price of which can be agreed upon with the Minister. If no agreement is reached, the price would be estimated by two experts; one of whom to be appointed by the Department and the other by the owner of the antiquities. If the two experts do not reach an agreement, they then should appoint a third expert as an umpire.

B-    If the Department refrains from buying the antiquities, the owner

may transfer its ownership to others; provided that such transfer takes place with the knowledge of the Department.

 

In accordance with article 26 A punishment by imprisonment of not less than less than one year and not more than three years and a fine of not less than three thousand Dinars and commensurate with the value of the effect  shall be imposed on:

2. Antiquities dealer, or who assisted or participated in or incited or inter to do so.

3. Did not provide a list of the antiquities that are owned or in his possession on the date the provisions of this law come into force.

8. The theft of antiquities.

9. Dealt in fake antiquities as genuine ones.

For further inquiries please don’t hesitate to contact me upon your convenience.

Yours sincerely

[deleted]

Attorney At Law

****** This email is sent for and on behalf of [deleted] LLP ******

Law Firm of the Year 2008-09

The Law Society Equality & Diversity, CSR Award 2008-2009

This email is sent for and on behalf of [deleted] LLP which is a limited liability partnership, registered in England and Wales, registered number. Registered office . A list of the members’ names and their professional qualifications is available for inspection at the above office. Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (see www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/code-of-conduct.page).

Confidentiality:  This email and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential.  If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this email and highlight the error.

Enhanced by Zemanta
September 19th, 2011

Examination of Cantor’s Zionism and Bachmann’s Dominionism

Flag of Israel with the Mediterranean sea in t...

Image via Wikipedia

Both Eric Cantor and Michele Bachmann have extreme religious beliefs. In Cantor’s Zionism God expressly desires a piece of land in Middle East be ruled and occupied by Jews. Bachmann’s Dominionism asserts that Christians should play a special role in the American Republic. However, the major news outlets have treated their religous beliefs very differently. While it is open season on Bachmann, Cantor’s Zionism is off limits. In a bizarre marriage of extremism, Zionism and Dominionism are joined at the hip; one never speaking a word against the other. But which one is truly dangerous for America?

via Cantor’s Zionism and Bachmann’s Dominionism: Joined at the Hip | Hawai`i News Daily.

Zionism and Dominionism – Yes, too very political and very theological viewpoints, neither of which I believe are ‘biblical.’

When people are elected to Federal Office in the United States, they swear to uphold the Constitution, but many today are taking pledges and running on platforms which promise to protect Israel over and above the United States. Why? Bad theology.

Enhanced by Zemanta
September 16th, 2011

2,000 yeard old Middle Eastern ‘Nazca Lines’

They stretch from Syria to Saudi Arabia, can be seen from the air but not the ground, and are virtually unknown to the public.

They are the Middle East’s own version of the Nazca Lines — ancient “geolyphs,” or drawings, that span deserts in southern Peru — and now, thanks to new satellite-mapping technologies, and an aerial photography program in Jordan, researchers are discovering more of them than ever before. They number well into the thousands.

Referred to by archaeologists as “wheels,” these stone structures have a wide variety of designs, with a common one being a circle with spokes radiating inside. Researchers believe that they date back to antiquity, at least 2,000 years ago. They are often found on lava fields and range from 82 feet to 230 feet (25 meters to 70 meters) across. [See gallery of wheel structures]

 ”In Jordan alone we’ve got stone-built structures that are far more numerous than (the) Nazca Lines, far more extensive in the area that they cover, and far older,” said David Kennedy, a professor of classics and ancient history at the University of Western Australia.

Visible Only From Above, Mystifying ‘Nazca Lines’ Discovered In Mideast | Fox News.

Thought this might interest a few of you – of course, they are most likely alien maps or something.

Enhanced by Zemanta
May 25th, 2011

You are either with Israel or you are with the TerrOrists? Don’t be stupid

So many, many, many, many things wrong with this:

Oh, and this is the group promoting such an unpatriotic, anti-American, anti-humanity, depraved and dilettantish statement.

If you are ‘Bibi’, and this is your slogan, then you 1.) have no clue as to what is happening in Palestine and 2.) more than likely based your theological and political beliefs on a very bad foundation.

This is the mission statement:

We’re sick of Obama messing with US/Israel relations. We Americans, stand in support of Israel and the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu.

I would suggest that they check the Constitution about what it means to stand against the United States of America as a citizen of this country.

Enhanced by Zemanta
May 24th, 2011

The Heckler and the Israeli Prime Minister

A heckler briefly interrupted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to Congress before U.S. Capitol police removed the protester from the chamber.

As Netanyahu was addressing a joint meeting of Congress, a woman in the gallery stood and shouted, “no more occupation, end Israeli war crimes.” (hereHT)

Good for him!

I note that he was invited by the GOP to put the President in his place.

Enhanced by Zemanta
May 17th, 2011

Obama is in fact the Antichrist. I told you so!

This is the current strain of thought going around the ‘the world is ending soon’ crowd,

“Israel must return to its 1967 borders,” US President Barack Obama is expected to declare on Thursday in his Middle East policy speech, Israeli daily newspaper “Yediot Ahronot” reports this morning. Obama will propose dividing Jerusalem between Israel and the Palestinian Authority but will rule out supporting any unilateral declaration of Palestinian independence.

Obama to Propose Dividing Jerusalem.

Of course, Clinton proposed the same thing. Plus, he’s not really about dividing Jerusalem, just about, you know, restoring the 1967 borders which, of course, divides Jerusalem, mandated by earlier peace treaties and the such.

But, the fact remains is that this is how it will be spun. And no one will pay attention to the fact that it has been proposed since 1967.

Or the fact that bible doesn’t really speak to this issue.

Or that the bible has a different understanding of ‘antichrist’ than we do, but then again, since we tell the bible what it means anymore, I guess it doesn’t matter what the bible actually said anyway.

Enhanced by Zemanta
May 2nd, 2011

What Happened to Rush Limbaugh?

“President Obama has continued the Bush policies of keeping a military presence in the Middle East. He did not scrub the mission to get Bin Laden. In fact, it may be that President Obama single-handedly came up with the technique in order to pull this off. You see, the military wanted to go in there and bomb as they always do. They wanted to drop missiles and drop bombs and a number of totally destructive techniques here. But President Obama, perhaps the only qualified member in the room to deal with this, insisted on the Special Forces. No one else thought of that. President Obama. Not a single intelligence adviser, not a single national security adviser, not a single military adviser came up with the idea of using SEAL Team 6 or any Special Forces.” (here)

Oh, and his humanity was short lived…

Enhanced by Zemanta
March 20th, 2011

Quote of the Day, from a Libyan Rebel

Middle East

Image via Wikipedia

We will kill a lot of people today.

via Oil consumers cannot ignore Middle East – Inside Business – ABC.

Enhanced by Zemanta
March 19th, 2011

I am conflicted with the action in Libya

The leader de facto of Libya, Muammar al-Gaddafi.

Image via Wikipedia

The United Nations passed a resolution told a sovereign nation how to act. When it refused, as it has, war was commenced, as it has. The man in charge of Libya is a murderous criminal and should be brought to justice, but my conflict first is getting involved in another war in the Middle East. Second, with what amounts to a growth of power by the United Nations. But, the people who are trying to win their freedom are being massacred.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy said allied air forces had gone into action on Saturday over Libya and were preventing Moammar Gadhafi’s from forces attacking the rebel city of Benghazi.

“Our planes are already preventing air attacks on the city,” Sarkozy said adding that military action supported by France, Britain, the United States and Canada and backed by Arab nations could be halted if Gadhafi stopped his forces attacking.

French fighter jets, flying reconnaissance missions across the north African nation, entered Libyan airspace to ensure that Gadhafi’s forces would not take any action there. Sarkozy said “our determination is total.” (here)

The U.S. simply cannot afford to be the world’s police force, and yet, here we are again. Of course, thankfully, we are not alone and only seem to be a minor player, but a loud voice.

What are you thoughts?

And, the French has a military? With actual live ammo? Who knew….

Enhanced by Zemanta
March 15th, 2011

And why is it that the Saudis are our Allies?

Not only are the Saudis putting down their own protesters, but they are being used as mercenaries in Bahrain.

The King of Bahrain has declared a state of emergency for three months on the island following weeks of anti-government protests, state television said.

An order by the king “authorised the commander of Bahrain’s defence forces to take all necessary measures to protect the safety of the country and its citizens,” a statement read out on television on Tuesday said.

The development comes a day after a Saudi-led military forces arrived to help prop up the government, which is facing pressure from the Shia majority to implement reforms.

via Bahrain under state of emergency – Middle East – Al Jazeera English.

I know, I know, the oil, but at one cost is our oil coming to us now

Enhanced by Zemanta
March 8th, 2011

Um, what? Israel seeks an extra $20 billion in US military aid

I can understand Alabama asking for 20 billion or Hawaii or even Ohio, but um, Israel?

Defense Minister Barak said Israel might request an additional $20 billion in military assistance from the United States in order to prepare for possible threats, given the recent unrest in the Middle East.

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal published Tuesday, Barak said that Israel should not fear regional changes or the risk of offering valiant concessions to the Palestinians.

Israel seeks an extra $20 billion in US military aid!.

Without making a ‘daring’ peace offer, however, Israel cannot seek additional aid, Barak was quoted as saying.

Israel already receives $3billion in military aid a year from the U.S., but any increase in aid could hinge on the country’s relationship with enemies Palestine.

It is perhaps little surprise, then, that Barak also said that Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is likely to offer Palestinians a state within temporary borders, detailing for the first time an emerging Israeli plan for breaking the deadlocked peace negotiations. (here)

Enhanced by Zemanta