Unsettled Christianity

One blog to rule them all, One blog to find them, One blog to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
April 23rd, 2013

Review: @KregelAcademic’s Charts on the Life, Letters, and Theology of Paul

Kierspel, Lars. Charts on the Life, Letters, and Theology of Paul. Kregel Publications, 2012.

Color me impressed — and I am not usually impressed with theological cartography. I guess it’s because of the older charting of eschatology and other facets of (should-be-by-now) long forgotten theological pretensions. And to reach for perfect honesty in this moment, I have purposely avoided Kregel‘s other charting books because some implied (by me) simplistic notions of what these books would look like on the inside. However, I must admit that after spending some quality time with this particular book, again I say I am impressed. The author, Lars Kierspel, is the former department chair at Trinity College but now teaches at Shiloh University in Iowa.

There are 111 charts exploring all sorts of issues with Paul’s theology, letters, and life. The book is divided into two sections. The first section includes four categories of charts — Paul’s Background and Context; Paul’s Life and Ministry; Paul’s Letters; and Paul’s Theological Concepts. Included in the letters is the entirety of the Pauline corpus — Paul, Deutero-Paul, and Pseudo-Paul. Granted, these are modern break-ups based on historical criticism, and rightly so, given that “Paul” is identified as each author, we should not use Marcion’s scissors when discussing the corpus in a theological context. As a give to those who do enjoy historical criticism, several of the charts include issues such as the New Perspectives and a nice list of charts digging into language of Paul. For the intertextual critics among us, charts 43–52 are especially insightful, if not extremely important in exploring a literary critical model of these letters.

The second section of the book, the Chart Comments, gives the author’s view and commentary on each of the charts in the first section. Here, the author takes to the ground to describe what he sees in the chart and even to recommend how to use it. Again, I turn to what first drew me to this book in particular — the New Perspectives on Paul (NPP; Chart 111). Kierspel calls attention to needed understanding of the plurality of the paradigm shifting school (251). He summarizes without polemic the basic arguments of the NPP while equally summarizing the basic argument against the NPP, ending with a mediating position. This is a welcomed allowance for those of us who do hold to some form of the NPP. Unfortunately, no such mediating position is given on the authorship of the letters generally considered to be non-authentic (see charts 72–3 and comments on said charts, 235).

One of my favorite charts (and subsequent commentary) is chart 77 (141–4). In this chart, Kierspel gives Key Texts and Their Interpretations. They include Romans 1.17, Galatians 2.16, Colossians 2.18, and 2 Timothy 3.16. Along with each verse citation he gives several possible interpretations. For instance, at 2 Timothy 1.18, he gives two very succinct choices – either Onesiphorus is dead or he’s not and either way, Paul either prays for him or expresses a wish for him. In the commentary section (237), he provides suggestions for scholars who hold some of the divergent opinions he has listed. Weiser, for instance, in looking at 2 Timothy 2.18.

Over all, I am greatly impressed with the quality scholarship devoted to the charts as well as to the commentary section. This is a fantastic resource for the study of the Pauline corpus and highly recommended.

 

 

April 16th, 2013

@KregelAcademic Review: The Singing Grammarian Songs and Visual Presentations for Learning New Testament Greek Grammar

9780825441677

ORDER

H. Daniel Zacharias has sung his way into my head. I’ve listend to these songs now for several weeks, with the intention to test them. As I have now done so — much to the chagrin of those who accompany me in the car — I can write a more accurate review.

Zacharias writes in the accompanying documentation,

Words were often chosen to create rhyme and rhythm to facilitate memorization, rather than chosen to precisely describe the finer points of grammar, so rely on the textbook for those specifics.

Very true. While not a complete text book, Zacharias has introduced a well qualified memorization tool highlight the most important rules (and exceptions to those rules) for the Greek student.

Anyone who has learned a second language — or even English (i before e and other rhymes) — understand the value of mnemonic cues to aid in remembering just what it is we need to know in order to read, write, and speak the given language. This is just what Zacharias aims to do. He has produced eighteen short songs that, like the mind worms of Ceti Alpha V, weaves their way into your subconscious and tricks you into learning where you were hindered before.

The tunes are familiar — childhood nursery rhymes already stuck in your mental synthesizer. Zacharias has taken then, them, and transformed them with some mildly eclectic interpretations and produced songs on declensions, articles, participles and verbs. Rightly so, they do not all sound the same. So, when you are singing them, you have already catalogued the right tune to the right rule. Oddly enough, as you start to then read Greek, or write it, the tune itself pops into your head so that Paul is now writing one of his epistles in a hard-rock version of Itsy Bitsy Spider.

Zacharias has taken established rules to learning Greek and set them to popular tunes in order for the novice to better pick up the rules of the language. They are short, simple, songs explaining rules, exceptions, and filled with audible references to plant deep into the student’s mind the way to read and write New Testament Greek.

April 15th, 2013

In the Mail: @KregelAcademic’s Charts on the Life, Letters, and Theology of Paul

Thanks to Laura B. at Kregel for this. You can see the Kregel product page here.

I opened it up and wow…. This is going to be a very useful book!

Description:

Paul’s letters have fascinated and challenged most every reader of the Bible. As a result, many general introductions and specific studies on Paul are available, but none are like Charts on the Life and Letters of Paul, which provides over 100 charts to explore the apostle’s background, life and ministry, letters, and theology. The charts visually offer clarity on:

  1. Basic insights (e.g., “Autobiographical Information”)
  2. Comparisons (e.g., “Parallels between Acts and Paul’s Letters”)
  3. Advanced tools for further study (e.g., “Key Words in Romans”)
  4. Analysis (e.g., “The ‘New Perspective’ on Paul”)
  5. Research (e.g., “Key Texts and Their Interpretations”)

Comments on the charts and discussions of significant theories-with leads for further exploration-are offered together with an extensive bibliography that includes references to past and current Pauline scholarship.Interested Bible readers as well as students of Paul’s life, letters, and theology will find plenty of material to deepen their understanding. Teachers will find the charts to be a valuable teaching resource. This book is an excellent supplement to any general introduction or specific study on Paul.

March 20th, 2013

In the (e)Mail – @KregelAcademic: The Singing Grammarian Songs and Visual Presentations for Learning New Testament Greek Grammar

There are scores of first-year Greek grammar textbooks available for Bible college and seminary courses in biblical Greek. Far less plentiful, however, are tools that help students learn and retain the subject matter, regardless of the textbook they use. People learn in many different ways, and a multimedia approach has been underutilized in the teaching of biblical Greek. There is no better way to assist today’s New Testament Greek grammar student than The Singing Grammarian. Designed for use on video display devices or computers, this fun learning program covers the major areas of introductory Greek and the major paradigms taught to introductory students. The title of each song explains its content: The Greek Alphabet song, First Declension song, Second Declension song, Third Declension song, Definite Article song, Present Active Indicative song, Present Middle/Passive song, Future Active and Middle song, Secondary Endings (Imperfect) song, Aorist Active and Middle song, Liquid Verbs song, Passive System song, (Plu)Perfect song, Imperative song, Subjunctive song, Infinitives song, and Participles song. These videos in Mov format can be played on many devices. On a Mac or PC, simply use Apple’s free QuickTime player for viewing. For those who want to view the videos on an iPhone, iPod, or iPad, add the videos to your iTunes library and then sync them to your device. Many Android-enabled phones as well Blackberry phones are able to play these files too; just add them to your phone. If your phone is unable to view the files, use a video converter to create a suitable format and screen size for your device. For ease in downloading your purchase, use a high-speed broadband connection and a download manager.

Order here.

March 5th, 2013

Review of “Defending the Faith: Apologetics in Women’s Ministry” @KregelAcademic

I have to be honest and admit that I came to Mary Jo Sharp’s Defending the Faith: Apologetics in Women’s Ministry predisposed to disagree with it. For good or for ill, I have some foundational and philosophical disagreements with the assumption that there must be separate ministries for men and women other than for certain delicate gender-specific issues. I have found no place in the New Testament that implies that men and women should be discipled differently or that they have different needs when it comes to spiritual formation or studying the Bible.

In addition, my personality is such that I have never found any of the traditional activities associated with women’s ministry remotely interesting (although I’m not criticizing women who do) and I am deeply offended when publishers assume that all they need to do is slap some flowers on the front of a Bible to make it more appealing to female buyers.

(And in the interest of full-disclosure, I was traumatized several years ago by a women’s ministry meeting at my church where they made us get up and “do the Locomotion” in order to force us to talk to perfect strangers. I walked out and never went back.

I have also always had the nagging feeling that offering women a ministry of their own allows some churches to claim that they have provided them a venue for service and fellowship without really allowing them to be involved in the larger life of the church. In business circles, this is what used to be called “the pink ghetto.”

For all these reasons, I do not, as a rule, join exclusively female Christian groups.

The purpose of this seemingly useless background information is to demonstrate the fact that Sharp had a lot of work to do in order to gain my trust. Her book, after all, was written with a very specific goal: to convince churches to include apologetics training in their women’s ministries.

After reading it, however, my biggest frustration is that it should be read by everyone, but probably won’t be because it’s targeted specifically at women.

Defending the Faith is a well-written, extremely persuasive argument for apologetics. Regardless of whether the reader is trying to convince their pastor to integrate apologetics into women’s ministry, men’s ministry, or the weekly handbell choir rehearsal, this book argues eloquently for the importance of Christians knowing their stuff—and being able to articulate it well.

Although the content of the two books is significantly different, I can unashamedly put Defending the Faith on my bookshelf beside J.P. Moreland’s Loving God with All Your Mind as two books that will convince most any Christian of the importance of apologetics.

As someone not predisposed toward tea parties and scrapbooking, I was immediately disarmed by Sharp’s admission that she, herself, didn’t understand the value of women’s ministry until she started teaching apologetics. Her confession regarding the southern belle atmosphere of many women’s groups made me like her right from the start.

One of Sharp’s first arguments for integrating apologetics into ministry is that a women (or a man for that matter) who doesn’t have a solid basis for her belief will live just like the non-believer down the street. A person’s actions, says Sharp, flow from what she really believes deep down in her bones. And a faith based only on that warm, fuzzy feeling a person gets from worship isn’t powerful enough to kick-start an inside-out transformation.

Next, Sharp makes the startlingly obvious observation that in no other area of study is it acceptable to assume that a person will know everything they’ll ever need by the time they’re a teenager. Millions of Christians, however, believe just that. The list of excuses that people offer for being satisfied with a shallow faith is sadly familiar, but Sharp’s response provides no wiggle room:

Please understand that we create a shallow view of the Christian faith if we do not deal with difficult passages and tough questions. Look at the dilemma presented by the author of Hebrews who wants to teach in greater depth on the difficult concept of Jesus as the High Priest, but he cannot because the people have become dull of hearing…If ladies in your church are using the idea of a “simple child-like faith” as a reason not to learn hard Christian concepts, you need to help them see that childish thinking is not to be confused with the heart that trusts God with childlike faith.

Defending The Faith is, at its core, a very practical book. It’s designed to give women who want to convince their church to incorporate apologetics into their women’s ministry specific strategies for approaching the pastor, finding quality material, and integrating it into the existing ministry structure. The author even goes into detail on how to create an apologetics curriculum from scratch.

But my favorite part of the book is Sharp’s responses to the most common objections she hears to apologetics itself. “Apologists just want to win arguments,” says one woman. “We should just give people the gospel,” says another. The author’s response is at once spiritual and practical:

The gospel of Jesus entails knowledge of certain propositions that another person may or may not believe. When we proclaim the gospel, we assume the historical reality of Jesus’ life, death and resurrection, the existence of God, the problem of a sinful human nature. Finally, we assume the reliability and authority of the Bible. If people have never been exposed to some of these ideas, these principles may sound foreign or confusing to them. When our message seems hard for our listeners to understand, instead of just walking away from the conversation and telling ourselves that they just were not ready to receive the gospel, we can help them with questions they may have on these issues.

One thing Sharp does not spend much time on are the reasons why women avoid apologetics. She acknowledges the problem to be sure, but unlike Toni Allen in Come Let Us Reason Together (another great book), Sharp doesn’t dive too deeply into why so many women seem to have an aversion to it. For my part, this is not a criticism. While Allen did us a great service in identifying the problem—that women, as a group, rely more heavily on their emotional experiences as proof of God—the last thing I want to read is another book talking about women’s deficiencies. Sharp wisely avoids the giant black hole of “what’s wrong with women” and concentrates instead on why apologetics is important and what we can do to convince people of it.

My criticisms of Defending the Faith are minor compared to its value to the church. First, the fact that it is specifically targeted at women will no doubt significantly reduce the number of people who could be reading it and benefiting from it. Nothing in the arguments the author makes is unique to the way women think, but focusing exclusively on women’s ministry almost assures that most men won’t read it.

Are men’s ministries actually more focused on apologetics than women’s? I suspect not. This book has the potential for impacting countless men’s ministries, but unless the pastor stands up and tells his entire congregation to read it, they probably won’t.

So maybe it’s not such a minor point after all.

My second criticism is more about marketing than content. Couldn’t they have come up with a better title than Defending the Faith? So much of this book is truly inspirational; so much of it makes the reader want to go out and change the way people approach their faith and live their lives. Couldn’t they have come up with something more representative of what’s inside? How about Women into Warriors: How Apologetics can Xenafy Your Women’s Ministry? Now there’s a book a man would read!

February 13th, 2013

@kregelacademic’s Devote Yourself to the Public Reading of Scripture, a Review

Several scholars enthusiastically support the modern preacher learning and then applying the skills of ancient rhetoric when they seek to bring forth a sermon. We often forget the way we speak the words are often as important as the words we speak. But, to move this further along, there are times that words well spoken, pulled directly from Scripture, will promote the power of Scripture more assuredly than the finest rhetorical skill of a well-crafted sermon. After all, the sermon is but an imitation of the ideal, Scripture.

There is a story that has stuck with me — that I try every now and then to emulate. There was once this preacher who, going blind, realized he must memorize his sermons. So faithfully, throughout the week, he would memorize his sermons so that no one would notice. One Sunday morning, he suddenly got disjointed and instead of his memorized sermon, the old preacher began to rehearse the book of the Prophet Amos, much to the chagrin of his congregation — who did not notice the rehearsal, but thought it another sermon. However, this sermon was much more powerful than the others and it caused a change in the congregation. Why? Because there are times Scripture itself is powerful enough without explanation, if delivered well enough, to entice the soul to God. This is the reason beyond the Lectionary and something we have forgotten as we await the sermon. Sometimes, just hearing Scripture is itself a revelation.

To live up to the biblical command of reading Scripture in public (1 Tim 4.13; the earliest accounts of worship services, preserved by Justin Martyr include obedience to this command), professor Jeffrey D. Arthurs has written a work well in line with the communication instructor’s desire to better afford the reader with some real skill. Pulling from the great preachers of today, such as Fred Craddock and Eugene Peterson, Arthurs begins by arguing for the public reading of Scripture, something beyond the often perfunctory Lectionary readings fitted between the announcements and the sermon on a Sunday morning. His central premise is that “(w)hen the bible is read well, it can minister as deeply as a Spirit-empowered sermon.” (14) This is not new, as the author reminds us as he takes us through early history, even until J. Edwards, of the devotion to hearing Scripture.

This is where his particular skill at communicating comes in handy. See, the author is not merely a devout lover of Scripture, but so too trained in speech and in the art of communicating. He can draw from Plato, from oral interpretation theories, and from the very tangible notion that regardless of any attempts to the contrary, it is impossible for the person in a dialogic stance to not communicate. He states this rather simply, saying, “You cannot not communicate.” (42) If we understand that concept, then we are ready to prepare ourselves. He lists several steps in this process as well, including using pictorial books to bring Scripture to life, for us, before we attempt to do the same for others. Of a special interest to this reader is Arthur’s use of science, such as mirror neurons (49), in describing how a properly prepared reader speaking well can cause contagion.

The book itself is divided into seven courses, using the almost overused metaphor of a meal to structure his book. Beginning with the argument (and history of the argument) for public reading. He moves to preparation, which includes the audience. From thence, Arthurs begins to describe the meat of the matter, focusing on appearance and voice. These things are important. As he demonstrates in the companion DVD, the body language of the speaker is an active part of the projection and reception the spoken word. He then adds two sections, one on creative methods and the other on group reading, to allow for some flexibility in reading Scripture, so that the reader and the audience can discover their gifts. The appendix includes sample scripts for group readings.

For those interested in simply hearing Scripture, this book is an important one because it combines both a love of Scripture and modern communication techniques with the belief that well speaking Scripture can be as, if not more, transformative than the sermon, an (in my opinion) unfortunate staple of Protestant worship services.

January 15th, 2013

Review: @KregelAcademic: The Handy Guide to New Testament Greek: Grammar, Syntax, and Diagramming

Thanks to Kregel Academic for this review copy:

First, these handy guides are just that: hand-sized and at-hand guides designed to help the professional student. Second, this guide in particular is a perfect of example of a book getting the meat of the subject, if your will, and not wasting time on the author’s peculiar interests. It is divided into three parts, tackling the three main areas of learning Greek. Part I looks at the basic rules of Greek Grammar (even including a phonics chart) while Part II looks at syntax, leaving the final third of the book to review diagramming. The book is made complete with a well organized selected bibliography.

In spending no small amount of time with this book, I was impressed with the magnitude of it. The great thing about learning Greek is the necessity to relearn it from time to time, but one does have not have the time to restudy all of the text books already devoured. While this book does not purport to teach you Greek, it does serve to unlock your memory (if you have learned it, that is) as well as develop the first year student just a bit more.

One of the better features of this book is the colorful charts as well as the use of color in declensions and the like. This helps the eyes after a long day of looking at black and white books. Another of the features not to be missed is the design of the book. The writing is accessible and geared to self-indulgence — rather, it is geared to being portable and an easy-to-understand book allowing for the student to need only the book and some free time. It is also available, I am sure, to help teachers out in dealing with students who may have had some time between semesters of Greek. This is the place to restart your Greek language.

20130112-103233.jpg

Seriously, that right thar is a beautiful hand model

20130112-103248.jpg

December 27th, 2012

In the Mail from @KregelAcademic: The Handy Guide to New Testament Greek: Grammar, Syntax, and Diagramming

Thanks to Laura from Kregel Academic for this review copy:

Whether you’re learning biblical Greek or using it, this is the reference tool to keep on hand. In a quick visual layout, it supplements textbooks to gives you immediate access to:

  • first-year Greek grammar
  • second-year Greek syntax
  • step-by-step phrase diagramming

Easy to carry and easy to use, The Handy Guide to New Testament Greek crystalizes the information you need to know for classes or enables you to develop a sermon or lesson outline from the Greek New Testament faster than you could from an English translation.

October 24th, 2012

Meet @kregelacademic

Finally… let’s welcome them to Twitter.

Follow, my tweeps, follow…

October 12th, 2012

Book Announcement: In the Beginning… We Misunderstood @kregelbooks (it’s out now)

in the beginning we misunderstood

Click to Order


Description:

For years, the evangelical church and its members have debated whether the Bible should be interpreted literally or symbolically in regards to the age of the earth. In their groundbreaking new book, In the Beginning . . . We Misunderstood, authors Johnny V. Miller and John M. Soden say that all these arguments have missed the point. Rather, what Christians really need to know is how to interpret the Bible in its original context. Exposing the fallacies of trying to make the biblical text fit a specific scientific presupposition, Miller and Soden offer a new approach to interpreting Genesis 1 that explores the creation account based on how the original audience would have understood its teaching. First, the authors present a clear explanation of the past and present issues in interpreting the first chapter of the Bible. Second, Miller and Soden break down the creation account according to its historical and cultural context by comparing and distinguishing both the Egyptian and Mesopotamian settings. Finally, they explore common objections to help readers understand the significance that the creation account has for theology today. Christians need not look any further than Genesis 1 to find clues to its meaning. Both irenic and bathed in Scripture, In the Beginning . . . We Misunderstood will equip every believer to navigate the creation wars, armed with biblically sound explanations.

In the Beginning… We Misunderstood.

August 27th, 2012

Finally… the way to protect “Traditional Marriage” @kregelbooks

the beautiful wife A few of us are more concerned with internal factors affecting marriage… like the relationship between spouses… rather than debating exactly how society will end if two people who love each other get married.

The awesome people who run the Kregel Books twitter feed announced this last week and I didn’t want to retweet it right off the bat. Why? Because when I opened it up, I read this:

Marriage is under attack

And I was like… OMJB, another gays getting married are going to destroy us all!!! But then…

In a widely-criticized and controversial 2008 update report, the Barna Group made the shocking claim that the divorce rate inside the church was no different than the national average. The report found that the divorce rate among all born again Christians, including evangelicals, was 32 percent. That finding is nearly identical to the 33 percent figure among non-born again adults. “There no longer seems to be much of a stigma attached to divorce,” said George Barna. “It is now seen as an unavoidable rite of passage.”

And then I was like… wow… I gotta check this book out some more.

Just for clarity’s sake – I am not a Beautiful Wife.

So I researched the author and found this site. Amazon has a snippet copy that I quickly read through. Yes, she is a bit on the conservative side (Adam and Eve), but she is fair about the submissive passages (No, disagreement does not mean that the wife is unsubmissive).

I haven’t read the book, so I can’t give an endorsement (no one asked), but I can say this – while reading the author’s website and what I could via Amazon, it seems that the author’s heart is in the right place – attacking the right things that actually destroy marriages – internal factors, not imaginary external factors.

If Churches were really serious, really concerned, really adamant about protecting the marriage and family unit, we would find more books and groups devoted to the cause, instead of political tirades against imaginary evils, led by men who are no more faithful that those they are attacking. This, from what I can see, is a generally (conservative, but not “thou shalt submit”) good book, and if nothing else, should be used for what it teaches over all.

Check it out.