Unsettled Christianity

One blog to rule them all, One blog to find them, One blog to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
December 25th, 2012

Christmas: The Time for Feminism (Repost – 2012)

Crucifixion with Mary Magdalen
Image via Wikipedia

The post from Dr. Gayle mentioned below is still one of my favorites. I have updated it just a little and will continue to repost it at Christmas time.

I am no feminist. I am not involved in the egalitarian debate nor the complegalitarian debate. I believe that a woman has her proper place in the house; however, so does the man for that matter. One is not Lord over the Lady, however, as I do not agree with the old Southern Baptist definition of ‘submission’. I am no feminist, but if I were, I perhaps  would celebrate Christmas as a sacred holiday. It is the birth of Christ, in the manner that it happened, in which women were freed from the tyranny of the Law, and the first event in Christianity relying such much on the Woman.

There was a post several years ago which has found root in my mind, nurturing a better understanding of bible translation, voices contained therein, and the audience. (It not merely the words which are read, but how we perceive those words that hold value to a translator) I realize that it might be impossible to believe that such a post could do these things, but it was one of the first posts that I read from the author commonly known as J. K. Gayle. It would be impolite to repost his entire post here, but allow me to post some and you go read the rest (after you read mine, of course. For his post, go here. He adds a new voice to the Nativity)

Let’s think about Mary, for a minute.

It was a terrible time in Palestine – the priesthood corrupt, Jews turning on Jews, the king a despot, and Rome raping more than the Land. In the midst of this, there was a young girl named Mary (Or Miriam, if you are Jewish). Mary would have been a young Jewish girl, somewhere between the age of 12 and 16 (if we were to stretch it) while her intended, Joseph would have been a man some years her senior. Her family was most likely strict followers of the Torah, as the cousin‘s husband’s was a member of the inner priesthood. They ‘espoused her’ (marriage unconsummated) to a man in the traditional way. Suddenly, due to no fault of her own, she had the hope of the world thrust upon her shoulders, and in such a way as to cause great concern among those that saw such a young and unmarried girl with child.

There is much to be explored in the Birth of Christ. As Dr. Gayle points out, there is the audience, who perhaps some years later, perhaps transformed by the One born that very night, would read of the account. We too form a certain audience today, in that we are far removed from the culture to which Christ was born. We are far removed from Mary, and fail to see her for who she truly was and what the ordeal most likely meant to her. There is, as always, much to discuss concerning any account given in the Scriptures, but we focus only slightly on Mary.

This is Mr. Gayle’s translation,

18 τοῦ δὲ ἰησοῦ χριστοῦ ἡ γένεσις οὕτως ἦν. μνηστευθείσης τῆς μητρὸς αὐτοῦ μαρίας τῶ ἰωσήφ, πρὶν ἢ συνελθεῖν αὐτοὺς εὑρέθη ἐν γαστρὶ ἔχουσα ἐκ πνεύματος ἁγίου.
This is the birth of the Anointed, Joshua. His mother Miriam was engaged to Josef; before they came together she held in her womb a child who came by the Breath of the Special One.

19 ἰωσὴφ δὲ ὁ ἀνὴρ αὐτῆς, δίκαιος ὢν καὶ μὴ θέλων αὐτὴν δειγματίσαι, ἐβουλήθη λάθρᾳ ἀπολῦσαι αὐτήν.
Josef, her man, her husband, a just person who didn’t wish to make a show of her, counseled secretly to release her from himself.

20 ταῦτα δὲ αὐτοῦ ἐνθυμηθέντος ἰδοὺ ἄγγελος κυρίου κατ᾽ ὄναρ ἐφάνη αὐτῶ λέγων,
ἰωσὴφ υἱὸς δαυίδ, μὴ φοβηθῇς παραλαβεῖν μαρίαν τὴν γυναῖκά σου, τὸ γὰρ ἐν αὐτῇ γεννηθὲν ἐκ πνεύματός ἐστιν ἁγίου·
These inner passions of his were angst. See. An announcer of the Master, in a dream, appeared to him to state:
“Josef, son of David, don’t be afraid to take beside you Miriam, your woman, your wife; the baby birthed in her, in fact, is by the Breath of the Special One.

21 τέξεται δὲ υἱὸν καὶ καλέσεις τὸ ὄνομα αὐτοῦ ἰησοῦν, αὐτὸς γὰρ σώσει τὸν λαὸν αὐτοῦ ἀπὸ τῶν ἁμαρτιῶν αὐτῶν.
She will deliver a son, and you will call his name Joshua; he will, in fact, save his people from their wrongdoings.”

22 τοῦτο δὲ ὅλον γέγονεν ἵνα πληρωθῇ τὸ ῥηθὲν ὑπὸ κυρίου διὰ τοῦ προφήτου λέγοντος,
These events were born out entirely so that the things spoken by the Master would be fulfilled through the Prophet who stated:

23 ἰδοὺ ἡ παρθένος ἐν γαστρὶ ἕξει καὶ τέξεται υἱόν, καὶ καλέσουσιν τὸ ὄνομα αὐτοῦ ἐμμανουήλ, ὅ ἐστιν μεθερμηνευόμενον μεθ᾽ ἡμῶν ὁ θεός.
“See, the young virgin will hold in her womb a child, and will bear a son, and will call his name Emmanouel,” which is translated “With us is God.”

24 ἐγερθεὶς δὲ ὁ ἰωσὴφ ἀπὸ τοῦ ὕπνου ἐποίησεν ὡς προσέταξεν αὐτῶ ὁ ἄγγελος κυρίου καὶ παρέλαβεν τὴν γυναῖκα αὐτοῦ·
When Josef got up from his sleep, he did what the announcer of the Master told him, and he took beside himself his woman, his wife.

25 καὶ οὐκ ἐγίνωσκεν αὐτὴν ἕως οὖ ἔτεκεν υἱόν· καὶ ἐκάλεσεν τὸ ὄνομα αὐτοῦ ἰησοῦν.
And he did not know her until after she delivered her son; and he called his name Joshua.

Like any other man, the Christ child came into the world, born of a woman, perhaps the most central woman since Eve.

I also am mortal, like all men, a descendant of the first-formed child of earth; and in the womb of a mother I was molded into flesh, within the period of ten months, compacted with blood, from the seed of a man and the pleasure of marriage. And when I was born, I began to breathe the common air, and fell upon the kindred earth, and my first sound was a cry, like that of all. I was nursed with care in swaddling cloths. For no king has had a different beginning of existence; there is for all mankind one entrance into life, and a common departure. (Wisdom 7:1-6 RSVA) (Note here and here)

Christ came not dependent upon man, or independent of any, but dependent upon His mother. Just as any child, he would had fed of His mother, being nurtured in a way to protect His life. In as much, He never dismissed a woman for being a woman, but pressed them, or was pressed by them, to a point that  a great spiritual truth was manifested for the entire world. First, it was the prophetess Anna (Luke 2.38) which announced just a short time after His birth, that He was to bring redemption. It was His mother who in Cana pressed Christ to start His ministry.  It was the prostitute in Jerusalem (John 8 – yes, I know) where Christ showed what forgiveness under Grace would be. Further  it was the Greek (Gentile) woman in Mark 7 that pressed Christ to shed His grace beyond that of Israel, to the Gentiles. Finally (perhaps not), it was Mary Magdalen which announced Christ Risen to the cowering disciples.

It it these voices which we hear when we mediate upon Mary. Imagine being in the shoes of that young girl who had just been given the Blessing of Abraham, the Inheritance of the Faithful, the Word of God. She most likely would have had nothing to her name – her husband having given her ransom to her parents – yet she had suddenly become the richest woman in all the world, and indeed, the most hated and hunted. Yet is was her who was considered the most blessed among women (Luke 1.42).

Her song has been remembered, sometimes falsely, since it was first written down by Luke.

And Mary said:

“My soul magnifies the Lord, And my spirit has rejoiced in God my Savior. For He has regarded the lowly state of His maidservant; For behold, henceforth all generations will call me blessed. For He who is mighty has done great things for me, And holy is His name. And His mercy is on those who fear Him
From generation to generation. He has shown strength with His arm;
He has scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts. He has put down the mighty from their thrones, And exalted the lowly. He has filled the hungry with good things,
And the rich He has sent away empty. He has helped His servant Israel,
In remembrance of His mercy, As He spoke to our fathers,
To Abraham and to his seed forever.”  (Luke 1:46-55 NKJV)

It might do us well to put ourselves in the shoes of Mary, and perhaps the other women as we read this account, who sought Christ and pressed Him during this season that is focused on the birth of the Child but generally ignoring the womb which bore Him. In this season which we focus on the birth of the Child who would give His life for the salvation of all, we must not forget the womb which carried Him, and the breast which nurtured Him, and the mother who raised Him. It is not unconstitutional for either a fundamentalist or an evangelical to consider Mary in the light which she is portrayed in Scripture and the unwritten words found only in a culture long dead.

Enhanced by Zemanta
July 2nd, 2011

Would a President Michele Bachmann still follow ‘Biblical’ Submission?

Official photo of Congresswoman Michele Bachma...

Image via Wikipedia

In the 1960 Presidential race, the big question was whether or not John F. Kennedy would, because he was Catholic, take orders from the Vatican as President. In my opinion, it was a legitimate question (and not of the Jack Chick kind either). Michele Bachmann practices what many call ‘biblical submission’, which as already seen her get a Tax law degree,

This is from the article below.

True:

In a speech at a mega-church in the Minneapolis area back in 2006, Michele Bachmann explained her decision to pursue tax law. It wasn’t her choice, exactly. God had already told her to go to law school; God had also told her to marry a fellow named Marcus Bachmann. Now Marcus told her “to go and get a post-doctorate degree in tax law.” This was not a particular desire of Michele’s (“Tax law? I hate taxes!”), but she was certain God was speaking through her husband.

“Why should I go and do something like that?” she recalled thinking. “But the Lord says, ‘Be submissive wives; you are to be submissive to your husbands.’”

….

Author’s stated opinion based on facts:

Indeed, it may imply something more—that as a woman who defers to her husband, she believes herself to be more liberated than secular feminists are. According to Karen Seat, a religious studies professor at the University of Arizona, some conservative evangelicals argue that women’s deference is itself empowering, because it’s what God intends, and because it is the fullest expression of womanhood. In this world of opposites, submission is strength and inequity is proof of equality. It’s quite possible that a President Bachmann would primarily define herself not as the first female president of the United States, but as a wife and mother. And she would not see that as anything less than progress.

Michele Bachmann and evangelicals: Can a woman really be accepted as a leader? – By Libby Copeland – Slate Magazine.

I think that having a Bachmann campaign would be a good conversation starter on ‘biblical’ submission. As you can tell by the scare quotes around the word ‘biblical’, I don’t particularly buy that point of view. But, what if Michele did – as she says she does – while in the White House? What if her husband told her to quit?

Enhanced by Zemanta
March 18th, 2011

Haber’s Touch of Mark 5.24-34

Symbol of feminism based on Venus symbol

Image via Wikipedia

I have chosen a selection by Susan Haber[1] regarding Mark 5.24-34 for examination for two reasons. First, it may be relating to my exegesis assignment and second, it is a favorite passage of mine.

Often times, when I explore the feminist side of biblical interpretation, I am left with the sense that it was written by a woman angry with me and just me. The ones which I have read, and I admit that it is not an extensive collection, seems to want to rewrite the biblical narrative to either do away with nearly all of the good masculine qualities or to turn some of the narratives on their head so as to avoid the historical truth of the situation. Yet, as I have expressed before, if a scholar or theological interpreter is able to use sound biblical studies to interpret a passage, whether I find it contrary to my usual position, I will more often than not lend an hear to it. Susan Haber, a self-proclaimed feminist, is writing to correct what she sees as two extremes in feminist interpretation of the healing of the Hemorrhaging Woman by presenting what she considers to be sound biblical scholarship with a feminist interpretive flair.

I believe that all interpretations should cease until one can deal with biblical studies, often times, I sense that interpretations are nothing more than what we want the text to say. Haber takes on Marla Selvidge’s interpretation, which reading it through Haber’s lens, seems to dismiss the actual Jewish law and customs for what we think they are, resting on the assumption that the patriarchal system was inherently evil. Jesus, then, was the ultimate gender neutralizer. Haber shows that to dismiss Jesus’ continued obedience to the ritual purity laws is to miss the point of the story and to stand outside of the historical reality. She then takes on both Levine and D’Angelo who dismiss the cultural womanhood issues which again, is outside the historical reality of Mark’s story. Instead, Haber draws a middle ground and insists that everything is important – the woman, the illness and the method of touching Jesus. In her course of study, she examines Leviticus in the Hebrew as well as a small amount of period interpretation, but throughout her assessment, she maintains a high standard of biblical studies. Only once she has laid her foundation does she prepare to interpret the passage, and does so with a feminist vision in sight.

For me, Haber’s grounding of her feminist vision in biblical studies builds the case for her interpretation. She is not being moderate or liberal or even conservative in her interpretation, but simply scholarly. This is where I believe the best interpretations are made, when they can be removed, as far as possible, from the individual’s biases and made off of real scholarship, which may or may not be to one’s liking.


[1] Haber, Susan. “A woman’s touch: feminist encounters with the hemorrhaging woman in Mark 5.24-34.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 26.2 (2003): 171-192. ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials. EBSCO. Web. 15 Mar. 2011.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
September 15th, 2009

Review: Encounter with the New Testament, An Interdisciplinary Approach

Thanks to Jason for this nifty free book.

Product Description
An exemplary text, Russell Pregeant’s Engaging the New Testament (1995) has provided a rich interdisciplinary New Testament introduction for upper-level and graduate students, incorporating a wide range of methods – literary, historical, psychological, theological, and social-scientific, and critically perceptive introductions to each of the New Testament writings.

Encounter with the New Testament adapts and abridges the best features of that textbook for beginning undergraduate students – surveying approaches to biblical studies, and discussing historical and cultural backgrounds, the historical Jesus, and the rise of the resurrection faith with attention to extracanonical materials. The textbook includes charts, maps, illustrations, reading suggestions, and more.

About the Author
Russell Pregeant is Professor of Religion and Chaplain at Curry College, Milton, Massachusetts, and Lecturer in New Testament at Andover Newton Theological School. He is author of several books, including the Fortress textbook Engaging the New Testament (1995,) and Knowing Truth, Doing Good: Engaging New Testament Ethics.

Rarely ever do I have to make myself read a book related to the bible – yet, for the first section, I had to constantly force myself to pick it up, plow through it, and see if it would get any better. Fortunately, it did. The book is divided into four parts, one dealing with historical (higher) criticism of the New Testament in which the author takes us through the various accounts of how the Jesus Tradition expanded, as well as methods of that expansion. The remaining three deal with the Gospels-Acts, the Undisputed Letters of Paul, the Disputed Letters of Paul, and the General Letters.

Pregeant promises an interdisciplinary approach to biblical interpretation, and delivers it, except during the first section of the book. He is able to properly place such interpretations as feminist, Freudian, Jungian, the Existentialist interpretation popularized by Bultmann, as well as literary approaches, liberation theology, and narrative criticism. In discussing the various books which serve to make up the New Testament, the author uses the different interpretative methods at different times.

In presenting the New Testament books, the author presents points to look for in the book, reading summaries for each section and then a summary. From there, he employees various interpretive methods as mentioned above. This is a fault of the book. While this book is intended as a entry level device, the author has so broadened the field that he is able to only use just a few methods at a time, and they are random, as if the author is using certain methods to get certain points across. The author, however, does not hesitate in tackling the controversial points of each books, such as the charge of antisemitism found so easily in Matthew, or Paul’s approaches to homosexuality and women and associating the proper methods with these issues.

While the author is squarely centered in historical criticism, and relies on Bultmann’s method as his primary tool, once you move past the first section, the remainder of the book should be well received by all students of the New Testament, if for nothing else, in examining how others view, or attempt to answer, the New Testament. I would recommend this book for those who are unfamiliar with different methods of interpretations.

January 12th, 2009

Miriam, a female church leader

The Blogger at Church Discipline wrote this piece some time ago, and I am just now getting around to posting it. My fellow blogger quotes,

“O My people, what have I done to you?
And how have I wearied you?
Testify against Me. For I brought you up from the land of Egypt,
I redeemed you from the house of bondage;
And I sent before you Moses, Aaron, and Miriam. (Micah 6:3-4 NKJV)

Further, the post reads,

Read the rest of this entry »

December 11th, 2008

'True Woman' movement seeks counter-revolution to feminism

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (ABP) — A group of conservative Christian women is seeking 100,000 signatures on a “True Woman Manifesto” aimed at sparking a counter-revolution to the feminist movement of the 1960s.

Introduced at a gathering of more than 6,000 women in early October, the document calls not for equal rights, but instead proclaims that men and women are created to reflect God’s image in “complementary and distinct ways.”

That includes the idea that women are called “to honor and support God-ordained male leadership in the home and in the church.”

“That is very explosive stuff,” organizer Mary Kassian described the campaign Nov.25 on a radio program hosted by Al Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. “It is countercultural, because the world would be screaming at us, women would be screaming at us: ‘What are you doing? All those rights that we fought so hard for, how can you say ‘ust give that up and say that men are to be the heads of the homes?’

“The basis on which we do that is because we believe that is taught in Scripture,” Kassian explained. “And we believe that is a blessing for women and not a curse against women, and that actually when we live according to God’s design, we find blessing and peace and wholeness in our lives.”

The idea for the True Woman ’08 Conference held Oct. 9-11 and webcast from Schaumburg, Ill., came as Kassian – an author, speaker and distinguished professor at the Louisville, Ky.-based seminary — and Christian radio broadcaster Nancy Leigh DeMoss discussed how feminism revolutionized women’s lives.

Recognizing that revolution began with a meeting of only a few women, they asked why there couldn’t be a similar movement sparked by a meeting of women driven not by feminist ideals, but by teachings of the Bible.

“We are believing God for a movement of reformation and revival in the hearts and homes of Christian women all around this world,” DeMoss said in the conference’s closing address. “I just believe there is a massive women’s movement of true women in those millions of women who are able to capture all kinds of battlefronts for Christ.”

DeMoss said there are “a lot of truly desperate housewives” in homes and churches, who are not finding fulfillment in what God intended for them to be.

Kassian told the gathering that women have come a long way in the last 50 years, but not always in the right direction. While they may not have been able to identify the source of their values, she said, the idea of complementary roles for men and women was part of the social landscape until after the 1950s.

In the 1950s, for example, the Cleaver family in TV sitcom “Leave it to Beaver” exemplified the ideal suburban family. In contrast, she said, during the last decade media images overwhelmingly portrayed women as being in charge, while men were “marginalized and de-masculinized” into characters that are whiny, needy, not-too-bright and totally unreliable.

Kassian said even Christian women have been influenced more by feminism more than they realize, including the idea that patriarchy — the idea of submitting to male authority — is the source of all their heartache and problems.

Kassian told radio host Al Mohler the solution is not going back to the 19th century but to Scripture. Instead of “wimpy women,” she said the movement is out to recruit women who are “doctrinally strong and theologically strong” and who will “study and search Scripture and come to scriptural conclusions.”

“I believe part of the reason the feminist movement was so successful throughout the ’60s was that you had a whole culture that was just living by [a] Judeo-Christian framework in the ’50s, without really thinking about [it]. And then when feminism came in with these new ideas, a lot of Christian women even began to embrace them,” she said.

“We are interested in a countercultural movement,” Kassian said, that looks nothing like “Leave it to Beaver” or the 1950s.

“True Woman is taking the Bible and God’s plan for womanhood and applying it to my life today in this millennium, in this year, and for what that looks like for single women, for married women, for women at all stages of life,” Kassian said.

Mohler, along with Kassian a member of the Council on Biblical Manhood & Womanhood, termed the manifesto “a very important document.”

“These are shots that ought to be heard around the world.” Mohler said.

The effort has a long way to go before reaching its goal of 100,000 signatures. As of midday Dec. 10, the number of online signers stood at 2,667.

Associated Baptist Press – ‘True Woman’ movement seeks counter-revolution to feminism.

November 26th, 2008

Religion news in brief

It’s Wednesday – the day before Thanksgiving…what do you expect?

GENEVA – The World Council of Churches will help deliver Christmas messages and prayers of peace to the biblical birthplace of Jesus.

The council, Christianity’s largest ecumenical movement, said that messages e-mailed before the Jan. 7 Christmas celebrated by Orthodox Christians will be printed and handed out at schools and places of worship in the West Bank city of Bethlehem.

The council said Tuesday that the messages are appreciated by people in Bethlehem who refuse to give up hope for peace between Palestinians and Israelis. The group asked that e-mails be sent to the Arab Educational Initiative, which does social work in Bethlehem.

The council brings together about 350 Protestant, Orthodox and other churches representing more than 560 million Christians.

Swedish feminist party starts campaign to make abortion a human right

STOCKHOLM, Sweden (AP) _ A Swedish feminist party will push for abortion to be recognized as a human right as the group tries to gain a seat in the European Union parliament next year.

Veronica Svard, a spokeswoman for the Feminist Initiative party, said advocates want to respond to religious groups in the EU who have campaigned to remove the issue of abortion rights from the European agenda.

“Women must have the right to decide over their own bodies,” she said.

The party was formed in 2005 but is currently not represented in the Swedish or European Parliament.

Abortion is legal in many European countries, but is prohibited in Andorra, Ireland, Malta, Monaco, and Poland. Restrictions are also in place in Cyprus, Luxembourg and Portugal and elsewhere.

Bishop Weeks’ church evicted from Duluth site

ATLANTA (AP) _ Bishop Thomas W. Weeks III, the ex-husband of televangelist Juanita Bynum, was evicted from his church over claims he owes hundreds of thousands of dollars in back rent.

Attorney Stephanie Friese of Grimes-Square Executive, Inc., says Weeks, the leader of Global Destiny International Ministries, has made no payments since July despite negotiations with the landlord. She says Weeks owes more than $400,000 in rent and fees.

Eviction proceedings began against Weeks in early October. Court records show that Weeks tried unsuccessfully to delay the eviction.

A sheriff’s deputy came to the Duluth church campus Nov. 14 to carry out the eviction.

Weeks’ divorce attorney Randy Kessler says he was unaware of the eviction.

Bynum, a popular Pentecostal preacher, author and gospel singer, filed for divorce after the couple had an August 2007 fight in an Atlanta hotel parking lot that landed Weeks in jail on charges that he pushed, choked and beat Bynum.

He pleaded guilty to assaulting her, is serving three years’ probation and has completed court ordered community service and anger management counseling.

Man’s nap damages organ pipes at historic Massachusetts church

NORTHAMPTON, Mass. (AP) _ This isn’t music to anyone’s ears: The restoration of a church’s 130-year-old organ has been delayed because four delicate pipes were damaged when a visitor napped on them.

The 18-foot pipes were among about 50 stored in the basement at First Churches in Northampton during the sanctuary’s renovation.

The Rev. Peter Ives estimates the damage at close to $15,000. But he says the organ can be played without the pipes. Ives says the church will not press charges.

The man apparently mistook the pipes for rolled-up rugs and slept on them. He is a homeless man who was in the church for a job counseling meeting.

The congregation traces its history to the 17th century, and was home to 18th century preacher Jonathan Edwards.

St. Cloud pastors want Wednesday nights reserved for church

ST. CLOUD, Minn. (AP) _ Clergy in the St. Cloud area are asking coaches and school activity directors to maintain the longtime tradition of keeping Wednesday nights free for church.

That’s the night traditionally reserved for confirmation, youth group and other religious programs. But some clergy say sports and other activities have recently been causing a conflict.

Nearly 50 religious leaders, including St. Cloud Roman Catholic Bishop John Kinney of the Diocese of St. Cloud, signed a letter reminding schools of church events on Wednesday nights.

“It puts our children in a bad spot,” said Ginny Duschner, faith formation director at the Roman Catholic Church of the Holy Spirit in St. Cloud. “They have to choose between two things that are important.”

Duschner said many church leaders are running into more competition for Wednesday programs, which she said have “always been a high priority around here.”

Andrea Swanberg, activities director at Technical High School, said that last spring bad weather that postponed games led to more Wednesday scheduling. Playoffs have also been scheduled on Wednesdays, she said.

“We still try to keep Wednesday open. We don’t want the students and parents to feel this conflict,” Swanberg said.

ACLU sues W.Pa. borough on behalf of church

PITTSBURGH (AP) _ The state American Civil Liberties Union said in a lawsuit that a western Pennsylvania borough violated a church’s religious freedom by refusing to allow the house of worship to shelter homeless people.

The First Apostles’ Doctrine Church in Brookville has allowed homeless people to stay at the parsonage for a few years. The Rev. Jack L. Wisor said the church, about 80 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, is following the Bible’s teaching to care for the poor and homeless.

The borough recently cited the church for violating zoning regulations by operating a group home. The church has appealed.

Witold Walczak, ACLU state legal director, said the timing of the closure couldn’t be worse, with winter fast approaching and demand for shelter beds exceeding supply.

The borough’s solicitor, Stephen French, declined comment, saying he had not seen the suit. It was filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh.

A service of the Associated Press(AP)

via AuburnPub.com – Religion news in brief

October 20th, 2008

Is the Bible Sexist?

via Is the Bible Sexist? -Times Online

Read the rest of this entry »

August 2nd, 2008

Abortion rights cleric accepts assignment in Ottawa

Abortion rights cleric accepts assignment in Ottawa : Latest Local News : The Buffalo News.

Abortion rights cleric accepts assignment in Ottawa

Updated: 08/02/08 2:38 PM

The Rev. David Selzer, the rector of the Episcopal Church of the Good Shepherd and an outspoken supporter of abortion rights, is leaving Buffalo to be gin a new ministry in Ottawa.

Selzer, who is 56, will be joined by Pastor Ann Salmon, 51, also of Good Shepherd, to lead a joint congregation of Anglicans and Lutherans in Ottawa, the first of its kind in Canada.

Selzer and Salmon, along with their spouses and children, will be honored on Aug. 24 at the church at a special ceremony.

Selzer came to Good Shepherd in November 1995 and became a vocal advocate for abortion rights in Western New York, offering a contrasting viewpoint to local Catholic leaders who against the procedure.

He participated in debates on the topic and was a frequent contributor to The Buffalo News opinion section on the matter.

He served as chairman of the board of Planned Parenthood (now Planned Parenthood of WNY) and was the moderator for the WNY Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice.

July 30th, 2008

A Pro-life Nation

Catholic.net – Catholics on the net.

A Pro-Life Nation

By Antonio Gaspari

WARSAW, Poland, JULY 29, 2008 (Zenit.org).- Many speak of abortion as a fruit of women’s emancipation and progress, but Poland sees it otherwise: Legal abortion was imposed there first by the Nazis and later by the Communists, and it has repercussions, says the leader of a pro-life organization. Antoni Zieba, secretary of World Prayer for Life and vice president of the Polish Federation of Pro-Life Movements, spoke with ZENIT about the Polish outlook on abortion.

He expressed his dismay that the United Nations and the European Union put pressure on Poland to liberalize abortion. The nation’s abortion law permits the procedure only in cases of a severe fetal deformity, or when the woman’s life is in danger because of the pregnancy, or she is a victim of rape.

Compared with Spain for example, which has a similar abortion law, Poland has a very low number of abortions. In Spain in 2006 there were 98,500 abortions, while in Poland that same year, there were 360 abortions, less than one a day.

Q: What is the secret of low abortions in Poland? Is the law applied more rigorously, or is the culture of life stronger?

Zieba: I don’t know exactly what the situation is in Spain. What I can say is that Polish society is pro-life. We have reached this objective thanks to decades of prayer and works of apostolate, also carried out during Communist domination. Within the structures of the Catholic Church, we have engaged in intense activity in defense of the life of the unborn. This apostolic action was intensified thanks to the activity of several lay movements and organizations that were formed after the decline of Communism in Poland, beginning in 1989. With the end of censure, we were able to distribute educational material on the value of the life of boys and girls from conception. We explained how to reduce the damage of post abortion syndrome and we have made known the true history of the legalization of abortion in Europe and Poland. The first to legalize abortion in our country were the Nazis in March of 1943. They wanted to eliminate Poles with abortion. Then the Communists arrived, and they began their dictatorship with the promulgation of the abortion law of April 27, 1956. For many Poles, especially young people, these events should trigger reflection and the realization that abortion was legalized, imposed and practiced in Poland by their enemies: the Nazis and the Communists. In this context, the books, pamphlets and booklets on abortion, distributed in churches, schools and streets, have had a profound impact on Polish society. In this connection, the teachings of John Paul II on the protection of human life from conception to natural death have been invaluable and decisive for the situation in Poland.

Q: How has civil society responded to this awareness-building campaign?

Zieba: Article 38 of the Polish Constitution states: “The Republic of Poland ensures the legal protection of the life of every human being.” Some Polish parliamentarians presented a petition requesting the addition of the phrase “from conception until natural death.” Unfortunately, the Lower House of Parliament rejected the petition, but according to polls carried out by PGB — Polka Grupa Badawcza, the best research center on public opinion, 52% of Poles are in favor of reinforcing the defense of life in the Constitution, while 35% are opposed. More than 506,000 people signed in support of the petition, while less than 2,000 expressed their disapproval.

Q: You are the secretary of World Prayer for Life. What tasks does this pro-life association engage in?

Zieba: Speaking of the protection of life, mention must be made of the great and decisive part played by prayer. In Poland, a mass movement of prayer and spiritual adoption of the unborn has developed — a real crusade for the protection of the conceived. These prayers have changed the hearts and minds of our fellow citizens and reinforced respect for life. World Prayer for Life promotes the spiritual adoption of conceived children. The movement was born in 1980, when we were still under Communist domination. The idea of prayer for the unborn was inspired directly by the Servant of God Pope John Paul II, during his trip to Poland on June 7, 1979. At the Marian shrine of Kalwaria Zebrzydowska, the Holy Father made an important speech in which he requested prayers for the unborn, explaining that man does not live by bread alone, and that there must always be a group of people who pray to the Lord.

Q: How many Polish pro-life associations are there? How do they coordinate? What is their relationship with the Catholic Church? What social aid tasks do they undertake?

Zieba: In Poland there are around 160 pro-life organizations, foundations and informal groups; they are active in the protection of mothers and children. The Polish Federation of Pro Life Movements is presided over by Dr. [Pawel] Wosicki and brings together some 130 organizations and groups. Cooperation between the Federation and the Catholic Church is splendid. Meetings between lay leaders, bishops and priests are frequent. At present, the federation has no relationships with non-Catholic Churches.

Q: At the recent meeting of the European Pro-Life Movements, which took place in Rome, you proposed the establishment of a Pro Life Day on a world scale, precisely on March 25, dedicating it to prayer for life. Can you explain further the meaning and purpose of your proposal?

Zieba: Prayer is the cornerstone of good actions. In the encyclical “Evangelium Vitae,” the Servant of God John Paul II wrote that a great pro-life prayer is urgent that will go across the whole world. This prayer should be made throughout the year, but I am convinced that March 25, feast of the Incarnation — of Jesus’ conception in Mary’s body — must become a world day of prayer for the defense of life. Pro-Life Day is already observed in several countries on different dates. I propose making March 25 the World Day for the Protection of Life, but without giving up the national Pro-Life Day. This day — on which the whole world prays, reflects and engages in the apostolate for the unconditional protection of the life of every person, from conception until natural death — might represent a day of unity for all pro-life protagonists and for men and women of good will.

Q: The idea has already been presented among several pro-life movements to appeal to all countries and international institutions to have at least one day without abortions, specifically March 25.

Zieba: This is a great idea. We will support this proposal and collect signatures in a petition addressed to Polish authorities, asking them to support this proposal when it is presented to the United Nations. The collection of signatures is a good occasion to remind everyone that unborn children are human beings protected by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which in article three states that every individual has a right to life, liberty and the security of his own person.

Q: While in Europe there is an abortion every 27 seconds and a divorce every 30, in Poland abortion and divorce are minimal. However, a certain relativist culture, very influential in European institutions, is pressuring Poland to promote radical socialist legislation. What can you say in this regard?

Zieba: Poland was the first country in the world to reject, democratically, a law allowing abortion, and to introduce one that protects human life from conception. And yet, several organizations, such as the United Nations and the European Union, are pressuring Poland to change its abortion law. These pressures are triggering objections and disagreements on the part of the people that, especially among the eldest, remember that the first abortion law was imposed by the Nazis, and the second was promulgated by the Communist dictatorship. How can Poland be asked to restore a law in favor of abortion, imposed by the two worst dictatorships of the 20th century? This demand is, moreover, unacceptable if one thinks that in the 15 years of the application of the pro-life law there have been optimum results. The number of abortions remains at a very low level, 360 in 2006, while in the 90s the number of abortions recorded was 100,000 a year, and during the years of Communist dictatorship it is estimated that the total number of abortions was over 600,000 a year. Pregnant women’s health is constantly improving, with the consequent decrease in death from childbirth. Infant mortality and the number of miscarriages are constantly decreasing Why change a law that functions so well?