2 Comments

  1. Gary

    On Benghazi, since it was a CIA outpost, there is going to be much info never disclosed. An ambassador should never have been there. However, my bet, it probably fell under the old WINTEL classification. In the old days it meant that intelligence sources would be disclosed if the info got out. That was code words meaning some person (spy, informant) would get killed if the info got out. Just conjecture on my part, but an ambassador being at an outpost predominately CIA. He was probably meeting an undercover person as a mole in a hostile group. And perhaps he was set up. Anyway, doubtful the real facts will come out, not because of political reasons, but because of compromising sources of intel.

    Reply
  2. Gary

    And a note on the IRS thing. Not justified at all. But I can see why some over-steroid induced IRS agents went over the top. As I remember, there were Tea Party gatherings that combined anti-government protests with pro-gun demonstrations that included “armed to the teeth” loyal and whacko Tea Party members carrying side arms and assault rifles, plus a few signs of Obama pictured as a Hitler. I would like those groups VERY carefully investigated, me as a crummy, individual who does not want my neighbor carrying a gun to a PTA meeting at my local school. Just call me wacky,

    Reply

Leave a Reply, Please!