#Sherlock Series 3 Episode 1 – Brief Thoughts

Sherlock Series 3 Episode 1 was a welcome return. The “case” was really nothing more than a “sub”plot and a bit of a bomb, but otherwise, the interactions between Holmes and Watson were what we’ve come to expect and proves why the Brits do Holmes better than the Americans. British Humour is simply the best.

I do not want to spoil it for you, but I really liked this episode. The dialogue as well as the mystery of how Sherlock died but lived was engrossing. The characters are still every bit as deep… and I swear there was a knock against the CBS version.

Anyway, for you yankees across the pond, you’ll have to wait until the 19th to see it.

Joel L. Watts
Joel L. Watts holds a Masters of Arts from United Theological Seminary with a focus in literary and rhetorical criticism of the New Testament. He is currently a Ph.D. student at the University of the Free State, analyzing Paul’s model of atonement in Galatians. He is the author of Mimetic Criticism of the Gospel of Mark: Introduction and Commentary (Wipf and Stock, 2013), a co-editor and contributor to From Fear to Faith: Stories of Hitting Spiritual Walls (Energion, 2013), and Praying in God's Theater, Meditations on the Book of Revelation (Wipf and Stock, 2014).

3 thoughts on “#Sherlock Series 3 Episode 1 – Brief Thoughts

Leave a Reply, Please!