10 Comments


  1. Piffle, Joel.

    Gary North is from a Reconstructionist background, no doubt. But go read LewRockwell.com and you'll see dozens of posts by North in favor not of theocracy in any conceivable sense, but for actual anarchy. He's an economist who believes in a free market; pardon me for agreeing with his Austrian school of economics (crap — am I a dominionist, too?).

    I'm sorry, but occasionally working with the Constitution Party because of points of overlapping interest (the Constitution in particular) no more makes you a Christian Reconstructionist than supporting the Democratic Party makes you an advocate of abortion on demand or unfettered drug use. Playing “six degrees of separation” can be taken too far – Obama is closely (but bogusly) linked with Louis Farrakhan just as easily – and this writer has done it. Not a single quote from Paul advocating a single plank unique to Rushdoonyism in the whole article — just scare tactics and attempted guilt by tenuous association.

    Reply

  2. Steve, point well taken on comparisons, which is why I used the word 'if' a lot. But, how can you be close to someone like Rushdooney and be influenced by them? He was an 'either or' kinda guy, from what I understand.

    Reply

  3. I have no idea how Rushdoony may or may not have influenced North. For all I know, North may have significantly departed from Rushdoony's plans for implementation of the Kingdom of God via political means (which I still contend is of a piece with advocating state-enforced social welfare…), or maybe he's just living in denial. But it is this unknown that makes the link between Rushdoony and Rand Paul seem waaay too contrived.

    Reply

  4. Rushdoony did NOT believe, say or write tht “political means” would bring in the Kingdom of God. Stop bearing false witness against him.

    John Lofton
    JLof@aol.com

    Reply

  5. What false witness? Rushdooney and others like him, such as the racist R.L. Dabney, see no real difference in politics and religion. The two are so intertwined that it is fair to say that Rushdooney does believe that political means will bring about the Kingdom of God.

    Reply

  6. Whoa, sorry — I didn't mean to slam him, really. In fact, I was under the impression that CR people such as North, DeMar et al. tended toward libertarian, small government stuff. But my experience has been that they're big on the “U.S. was/is/should be a Christian nation” kick, which is baffling if not intended to advocate some Christian influence on politics, which in turn seems only useful if intended to influence the public via political means.

    At any rate, I was playing off the article's and Joel's characterization of him, when I should have been more careful.

    Reply

  7. Steve – you libertarians <—notice the little 'l') need to solidify here. I've had another Libertarian tell me that Dominionism is anti-libertarian and more along the lines of socialism.

    Rushdooney was big on the Christian nation by any means bent. Click through the link on Rushdooney.

    Reply

  8. As I said, Joel, I'm no expert on CR, or even quite sure that Dominionism and CR are even the same thing. (Any help, John?)

    You socialists need to solidify here — seems you would like Dominianism. 😉

    Reply

  9. burn…burn.. boo hisss….

    CR is the foundation for dominionism, in my opinion.

    And socialism is the cure for all the world's ills, more especially libertarianism :)

    Reply

  10. Whoa, sorry — I didn't mean to slam him, really. In fact, I was under the
    impression that CR people such as North, DeMar et al. tended toward
    libertarian, small government stuff. But my experience has been that they're
    big on the “U.S. was/is/should be a Christian nation” kick, which is
    baffling if not intended to advocate some Christian influence on politics,
    which in turn seems only useful if intended to influence the public via
    political means.

    At any rate, I was playing off the article's and Joel's characterization of
    him, when I should have been more careful.

    Reply

Leave a Reply, Please!