<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Unsettled Christianity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unsettledchristianity.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com</link>
	<description>One blog to rule them all, One blog to find them, One blog to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:36:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 4 umbrellas, 4 presidents #umbrellagata by Gary</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/4-umbrellas-4-presidents-umbrellagata/#comment-1192688</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53219#comment-1192688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, idiot , for me, was referring to people accusing Obama of releasing classified info, when he would have the right to release it. Not referring to you. Sorry if I was too strong. Umbrella-gate is not at the level. As Sec of State, and a decorated Vietnam vet, I would think ANY Marine would hold an umbrella for Kerry if asked. Wouldn&#039;t you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, idiot , for me, was referring to people accusing Obama of releasing classified info, when he would have the right to release it. Not referring to you. Sorry if I was too strong. Umbrella-gate is not at the level. As Sec of State, and a decorated Vietnam vet, I would think ANY Marine would hold an umbrella for Kerry if asked. Wouldn&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 4 umbrellas, 4 presidents #umbrellagata by Spencer Brown</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/4-umbrellas-4-presidents-umbrellagata/#comment-1192687</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53219#comment-1192687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you&#039;re saying that if a certain person does it, it&#039;s not a breach of protocol, it&#039;s just sort-of bending the rules?

What if John Kerry had requested an umbrella? He&#039;s not the Commander in Chief, so would the Marine be breaking protocol if he held an umbrella for the Secy. of State?

But if it does just apply to Obama, than it applied to Bush as well. So let&#039;s not start pointing fingers about protocol, *cough* IRS, Fast and Furious, Benghazi *cough*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re saying that if a certain person does it, it&#8217;s not a breach of protocol, it&#8217;s just sort-of bending the rules?</p>
<p>What if John Kerry had requested an umbrella? He&#8217;s not the Commander in Chief, so would the Marine be breaking protocol if he held an umbrella for the Secy. of State?</p>
<p>But if it does just apply to Obama, than it applied to Bush as well. So let&#8217;s not start pointing fingers about protocol, *cough* IRS, Fast and Furious, Benghazi *cough*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 4 umbrellas, 4 presidents #umbrellagata by Spencer Brown</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/4-umbrellas-4-presidents-umbrellagata/#comment-1192685</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53219#comment-1192685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two Things:

1. I object to being called an idiot for merely citing the rules our military follows. Obviously Obama has final say, and I&#039;m not criticizing the act, it&#039;s merely a fun point to jab at. Since when did liberals lose their sense of humor?

2. It&#039;s &quot;Commander IN Chief&quot; not &quot;Commander and Chief&quot; as you put.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two Things:</p>
<p>1. I object to being called an idiot for merely citing the rules our military follows. Obviously Obama has final say, and I&#8217;m not criticizing the act, it&#8217;s merely a fun point to jab at. Since when did liberals lose their sense of humor?</p>
<p>2. It&#8217;s &#8220;Commander IN Chief&#8221; not &#8220;Commander and Chief&#8221; as you put.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 4 umbrellas, 4 presidents #umbrellagata by Gary</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/4-umbrellas-4-presidents-umbrellagata/#comment-1192684</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53219#comment-1192684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reminds me of the people accusing Obama of releasing classified info on the bin laden raid. Any person that actually handled classified documents receives training that states, the president has ultimate release authority on any classified documents. Not that I think anything sensitive was released. But the people accusing Obama of something he has the ultimate right to do, shows the accusers are again, idiots who do not even know the rules of the game, or are ignoring the known rules on purpose. They call the president Commander and Chief (of the military), for a reason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of the people accusing Obama of releasing classified info on the bin laden raid. Any person that actually handled classified documents receives training that states, the president has ultimate release authority on any classified documents. Not that I think anything sensitive was released. But the people accusing Obama of something he has the ultimate right to do, shows the accusers are again, idiots who do not even know the rules of the game, or are ignoring the known rules on purpose. They call the president Commander and Chief (of the military), for a reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 4 umbrellas, 4 presidents #umbrellagata by Joel</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/4-umbrellas-4-presidents-umbrellagata/#comment-1192678</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53219#comment-1192678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spencer, 

I could argue semantics, but considering the President has asked for it, and another marine has allowed that it does happen, not sure you can rightly argue for this as a breach of protocol. 

say, how about the breach in protocol where thousands of marines died under Bush because of a lie?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spencer, </p>
<p>I could argue semantics, but considering the President has asked for it, and another marine has allowed that it does happen, not sure you can rightly argue for this as a breach of protocol. </p>
<p>say, how about the breach in protocol where thousands of marines died under Bush because of a lie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 4 umbrellas, 4 presidents #umbrellagata by Know More Than I Should</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/4-umbrellas-4-presidents-umbrellagata/#comment-1192673</link>
		<dc:creator>Know More Than I Should</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53219#comment-1192673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been aware of that rule since the early 1960s.  Only a a decade earlier, DIs at Parris were permitted to manhandle recruits.   That, too, passed.   
.
Which is more important: Obeying the orders of a superior or being able to salute that superior?  
.
P.S. The fastest way for a Marine to land in the brig is to disobey a direct order.  The commander in chief is about as far up the chain of command as you&#039;re gonna get.  Capiche?  If you don&#039;t comprehend, read Article II, Section 2, Clause I of The Constitution of the United States.  It&#039;s there in plain English.  
.
P.S.S. If you want to learn from first hand experience, see your local Marine recruiter.  He&#039;s always looking for a few good men!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been aware of that rule since the early 1960s.  Only a a decade earlier, DIs at Parris were permitted to manhandle recruits.   That, too, passed.<br />
.<br />
Which is more important: Obeying the orders of a superior or being able to salute that superior?<br />
.<br />
P.S. The fastest way for a Marine to land in the brig is to disobey a direct order.  The commander in chief is about as far up the chain of command as you&#8217;re gonna get.  Capiche?  If you don&#8217;t comprehend, read Article II, Section 2, Clause I of The Constitution of the United States.  It&#8217;s there in plain English.<br />
.<br />
P.S.S. If you want to learn from first hand experience, see your local Marine recruiter.  He&#8217;s always looking for a few good men!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 4 umbrellas, 4 presidents #umbrellagata by Spencer Brown</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/4-umbrellas-4-presidents-umbrellagata/#comment-1192672</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53219#comment-1192672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But yes, it is the rule:

Marine Corps regulation MCO P1020.34F of the Marine Corps Uniform Regulations chapter 3 says a male Marine is not allowed to carry an umbrella while in uniform. 

Rare or not, it&#039;s still a breach in protocol.  And I&#039;ve never seen a male marine in full dress holding an umbrella. In the featured photo above, none of the other umbrellas are held by a Marine. 

The photo is misleading and misses the point - it isn&#039;t the fact that it&#039;s an umbrella being held or a president it&#039;s being held over, its the fact that a marine in dress is holding it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But yes, it is the rule:</p>
<p>Marine Corps regulation MCO P1020.34F of the Marine Corps Uniform Regulations chapter 3 says a male Marine is not allowed to carry an umbrella while in uniform. </p>
<p>Rare or not, it&#8217;s still a breach in protocol.  And I&#8217;ve never seen a male marine in full dress holding an umbrella. In the featured photo above, none of the other umbrellas are held by a Marine. </p>
<p>The photo is misleading and misses the point &#8211; it isn&#8217;t the fact that it&#8217;s an umbrella being held or a president it&#8217;s being held over, its the fact that a marine in dress is holding it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on E·Van·Gel·Ism by Kerry Miller</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/e-van-gel-ism/#comment-1192671</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53224#comment-1192671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;That sort of siege mentality has destroyed the Church and diluted the Gospel&quot;.  Yep.  In fact I think it has completely subverted the intent of the Good News.  (but then again, I&#039;m a bloody heretic, so anything I say is suspect ;)

Good blog, Joel!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That sort of siege mentality has destroyed the Church and diluted the Gospel&#8221;.  Yep.  In fact I think it has completely subverted the intent of the Good News.  (but then again, I&#8217;m a bloody heretic, so anything I say is suspect <img src='http://unsettledchristianity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Good blog, Joel!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on E·Van·Gel·Ism by Geoffrey</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/e-van-gel-ism/#comment-1192670</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53224#comment-1192670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 4 umbrellas, 4 presidents #umbrellagata by Joel</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/4-umbrellas-4-presidents-umbrellagata/#comment-1192662</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53219#comment-1192662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah, that&#039;s not really the case, Spencer. 

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/16/marines-holding-umbrellas-extremely-rare/ 

Rare indicates it does happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, that&#8217;s not really the case, Spencer. </p>
<p><a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/16/marines-holding-umbrellas-extremely-rare/" rel="nofollow">http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/16/marines-holding-umbrellas-extremely-rare/</a> </p>
<p>Rare indicates it does happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 4 umbrellas, 4 presidents #umbrellagata by Spencer Brown</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/4-umbrellas-4-presidents-umbrellagata/#comment-1192638</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53219#comment-1192638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The difference (and resulting outrage) is that Obama is the first president to force a Marine to breach protocol in such a manner - it is clearly stated in the US Marine Corps regulations that marines in full dress are not to hold umbrellas. And there is no exception to the rule, and it has never been broken at the request of the President, on world-wide television. That is the problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference (and resulting outrage) is that Obama is the first president to force a Marine to breach protocol in such a manner &#8211; it is clearly stated in the US Marine Corps regulations that marines in full dress are not to hold umbrellas. And there is no exception to the rule, and it has never been broken at the request of the President, on world-wide television. That is the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 4 umbrellas, 4 presidents #umbrellagata by Know More Than I Should</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/4-umbrellas-4-presidents-umbrellagata/#comment-1192635</link>
		<dc:creator>Know More Than I Should</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53219#comment-1192635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never mind that Shrub was a draft dodger whose daddy pulled strings to get him into a National Guard unit as American causalities in Vietnam peaked, Obama was the only photographed president under an umbrella to not serve in the military.  Of course, Obama would have been just about the right age to be graduating from elementary school when Vietnam era conscription ended.  

The Obama under the umbrella flap is reminiscent of the Obama with no hand over his heart photo that was supposedly taken during the playing of the National Anthem on Veteran&#039;s Day.  In actuality, the photo in question was made just after Obama took the stage at the Arlington wreath laying ceremony while Hail to the Chief was still being played.  Under those circumstances, protocol dictates that the president is to receive the same respect as the flag if the National Anthem was being played.

Two simultaneous events have the right wing&#039;s collective underpants in a twist.  One is that a Democrat occupies &quot;their&quot; White House.  Even worse is that president happens to be a person of color.  It&#039;s also why all the talk over impeachment and well as the sudden concern over the national debut - which was largely caused by the debt and war cycle under Republican presidential administrations that America&#039;s founding fathers so feared.

Meanwhile, locked in a cerebral time warp of their own making, the right wing believes it&#039;s still Morning in America with a reincarnation of Ronnie is just waiting in the wings.  In reality, the world has moved on without them.  It will take more than a few high class funerals to make the Republican Party viable again.  That won&#039;t happen for another 30 or 40 years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind that Shrub was a draft dodger whose daddy pulled strings to get him into a National Guard unit as American causalities in Vietnam peaked, Obama was the only photographed president under an umbrella to not serve in the military.  Of course, Obama would have been just about the right age to be graduating from elementary school when Vietnam era conscription ended.  </p>
<p>The Obama under the umbrella flap is reminiscent of the Obama with no hand over his heart photo that was supposedly taken during the playing of the National Anthem on Veteran&#8217;s Day.  In actuality, the photo in question was made just after Obama took the stage at the Arlington wreath laying ceremony while Hail to the Chief was still being played.  Under those circumstances, protocol dictates that the president is to receive the same respect as the flag if the National Anthem was being played.</p>
<p>Two simultaneous events have the right wing&#8217;s collective underpants in a twist.  One is that a Democrat occupies &#8220;their&#8221; White House.  Even worse is that president happens to be a person of color.  It&#8217;s also why all the talk over impeachment and well as the sudden concern over the national debut &#8211; which was largely caused by the debt and war cycle under Republican presidential administrations that America&#8217;s founding fathers so feared.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, locked in a cerebral time warp of their own making, the right wing believes it&#8217;s still Morning in America with a reincarnation of Ronnie is just waiting in the wings.  In reality, the world has moved on without them.  It will take more than a few high class funerals to make the Republican Party viable again.  That won&#8217;t happen for another 30 or 40 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Questions for KJV-only Supporters by Joel</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2009/01/10-questions-for-kjv-only-supporters/#comment-1192613</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thechurchofjesuschrist.wordpress.com/?p=5452#comment-1192613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can&#039;t. If they aren&#039;t willing to admit their problem, then you can&#039;t help them with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t. If they aren&#8217;t willing to admit their problem, then you can&#8217;t help them with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Questions for KJV-only Supporters by Rick Smith</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2009/01/10-questions-for-kjv-only-supporters/#comment-1192612</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thechurchofjesuschrist.wordpress.com/?p=5452#comment-1192612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it difficult dealing with a family member who is a constant reposter of Biblical verses from websites.  95% of the time I love the posts, but then he posts something that says that all other Biblical translations are from Satan.   The arguments of the KJV only people seem simplistic and misguided..   The funny thing is that I have seen a 1611 KJV version and compared it to their Bible and they are not equal.  There are obvious differences.    Usually I don&#039;t say anything but recently I have posted that such arguments are unlikely to draw people to Christ and that such bashing of other translations is not progressive.  This has not detoured him.  I wish he would just post that he prefers the KJV over others but he seems to be on a mission to discredit other versions. How do we deal with such ignorance?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it difficult dealing with a family member who is a constant reposter of Biblical verses from websites.  95% of the time I love the posts, but then he posts something that says that all other Biblical translations are from Satan.   The arguments of the KJV only people seem simplistic and misguided..   The funny thing is that I have seen a 1611 KJV version and compared it to their Bible and they are not equal.  There are obvious differences.    Usually I don&#8217;t say anything but recently I have posted that such arguments are unlikely to draw people to Christ and that such bashing of other translations is not progressive.  This has not detoured him.  I wish he would just post that he prefers the KJV over others but he seems to be on a mission to discredit other versions. How do we deal with such ignorance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: Girl&#8217;s Life Application Study Bible, NLT by Joel</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2010/06/review-girls-life-application-study-bible-nlt/#comment-1192557</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 02:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thechurchofjesuschrist.us/?p=23436#comment-1192557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks, Heather!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, Heather!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: Girl&#8217;s Life Application Study Bible, NLT by Heather Thornhill</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2010/06/review-girls-life-application-study-bible-nlt/#comment-1192538</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Thornhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thechurchofjesuschrist.us/?p=23436#comment-1192538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for this great video.  I am buying a bible for my 9 year old daughter and I was 90% sure this was the one I wanted. Your video made my decision 100%.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this great video.  I am buying a bible for my 9 year old daughter and I was 90% sure this was the one I wanted. Your video made my decision 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on @SpeakerBoehner and the Myth of the American Judicial System by Gary</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/speakerboehner-and-the-myth-of-the-american-judicial-system/#comment-1192509</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53212#comment-1192509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And a note on the IRS thing. Not justified at all. But I can see why some over-steroid induced IRS agents went over the top. As I remember, there were Tea Party gatherings that combined anti-government protests with pro-gun demonstrations that included &quot;armed to the teeth&quot; loyal and whacko Tea Party members carrying side arms and assault rifles, plus a few signs of Obama pictured as a Hitler. I would like those groups VERY carefully investigated, me as a crummy, individual who does not want my neighbor carrying a gun to a PTA meeting at my local school. Just call me wacky,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And a note on the IRS thing. Not justified at all. But I can see why some over-steroid induced IRS agents went over the top. As I remember, there were Tea Party gatherings that combined anti-government protests with pro-gun demonstrations that included &#8220;armed to the teeth&#8221; loyal and whacko Tea Party members carrying side arms and assault rifles, plus a few signs of Obama pictured as a Hitler. I would like those groups VERY carefully investigated, me as a crummy, individual who does not want my neighbor carrying a gun to a PTA meeting at my local school. Just call me wacky,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Thaw has completely changed my perspective on Christianity in America by Graeme</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/the-thaw-has-completely-changed-my-perspective-on-christianity-in-america/#comment-1192507</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53142#comment-1192507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m from Australia and we saw this clip and immediately had the impression that US teens are far dumber than ours.  Yes, this clip makes US teens look like the most stupid idiots on the planet.
Having to provide a level playing field in public schools for all religions is oppression, PLEEEZ, spare the world from these idiotic losers.  If those youth could understand how we see them, they&#039;d suicide and raise the average intelligence of the US.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m from Australia and we saw this clip and immediately had the impression that US teens are far dumber than ours.  Yes, this clip makes US teens look like the most stupid idiots on the planet.<br />
Having to provide a level playing field in public schools for all religions is oppression, PLEEEZ, spare the world from these idiotic losers.  If those youth could understand how we see them, they&#8217;d suicide and raise the average intelligence of the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of @BakerAcademic&#8217;s Liturgy as a Way of Life: Embodying the Arts in Christian Worship by BA Books &#38; Authors on the Web &#8211; May 17, 2013</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/review-of-bakeracademics-liturgy-as-a-way-of-life-embodying-the-arts-in-christian-worship/#comment-1192506</link>
		<dc:creator>BA Books &#38; Authors on the Web &#8211; May 17, 2013</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=52969#comment-1192506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Liturgy as a Way of Life by Bruce Ellis Benson was reviewed by blogger Joel Watts. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Liturgy as a Way of Life by Bruce Ellis Benson was reviewed by blogger Joel Watts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on @SpeakerBoehner and the Myth of the American Judicial System by Gary</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/speakerboehner-and-the-myth-of-the-american-judicial-system/#comment-1192504</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53212#comment-1192504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Benghazi, since it was a CIA outpost, there is going to be much info never disclosed.  An ambassador should never have been there. However, my bet, it probably fell under the old WINTEL classification. In the old days it meant that intelligence sources would be disclosed if the info got out. That was code words meaning some person (spy, informant) would get killed if the info got out. Just conjecture on my part, but an ambassador being at an outpost predominately CIA. He was probably meeting an undercover person as a mole in a hostile group. And perhaps he was set up. Anyway, doubtful the real facts will come out, not because of political reasons, but because of compromising sources of intel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Benghazi, since it was a CIA outpost, there is going to be much info never disclosed.  An ambassador should never have been there. However, my bet, it probably fell under the old WINTEL classification. In the old days it meant that intelligence sources would be disclosed if the info got out. That was code words meaning some person (spy, informant) would get killed if the info got out. Just conjecture on my part, but an ambassador being at an outpost predominately CIA. He was probably meeting an undercover person as a mole in a hostile group. And perhaps he was set up. Anyway, doubtful the real facts will come out, not because of political reasons, but because of compromising sources of intel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on But&#8230; But&#8230; Noah&#8230; Moses and that Giggie guy&#8230; by Bilbo</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/but-but-noah-moses-and-that-giggie-guy/#comment-1192496</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53216#comment-1192496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I should add my two cents on the question of the origin (not the evolution) of life.  So far it remains a mystery.  Scientists continue to search for a materialistic explanation, but keep running into dead ends. 

When we examine even the simplest bacteria we find organisms that process &quot;information&quot; in a much more sophisticated way than our most complex computers.  Perhaps one day we&#039;ll find a materialistic explanation, but common sense intuition suggests that we should be looking for something above and beyond that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I should add my two cents on the question of the origin (not the evolution) of life.  So far it remains a mystery.  Scientists continue to search for a materialistic explanation, but keep running into dead ends. </p>
<p>When we examine even the simplest bacteria we find organisms that process &#8220;information&#8221; in a much more sophisticated way than our most complex computers.  Perhaps one day we&#8217;ll find a materialistic explanation, but common sense intuition suggests that we should be looking for something above and beyond that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on But&#8230; But&#8230; Noah&#8230; Moses and that Giggie guy&#8230; by Bilbo</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/but-but-noah-moses-and-that-giggie-guy/#comment-1192493</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53216#comment-1192493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given that bacteria is supposed to be at least 3.5 billion years old, they should find life in that water.  I&#039;m wondering why they say it will take a year to know.  To make sure the samples of life they find haven&#039;t been contaminated by surface microbes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that bacteria is supposed to be at least 3.5 billion years old, they should find life in that water.  I&#8217;m wondering why they say it will take a year to know.  To make sure the samples of life they find haven&#8217;t been contaminated by surface microbes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Star Trek Into Darkness is the core of Star Trek by Joel</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/star-trek-into-darkness-is-the-core-of-star-trek/#comment-1192385</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 15:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53199#comment-1192385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are missing something special...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are missing something special&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Star Trek Into Darkness is the core of Star Trek by Ken Leonard</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2013/05/star-trek-into-darkness-is-the-core-of-star-trek/#comment-1192384</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 15:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsettledchristianity.com/?p=53199#comment-1192384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re really trying to convince me to watch this, aren&#039;t you?

Fine.

Okay.

But not in a theater. DVD. When it&#039;s available from Netflix.

That&#039;s the best I&#039;ll do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re really trying to convince me to watch this, aren&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>Fine.</p>
<p>Okay.</p>
<p>But not in a theater. DVD. When it&#8217;s available from Netflix.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the best I&#8217;ll do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arnold Murray: Secret Identity by Joel</title>
		<link>http://unsettledchristianity.com/2008/08/arnold-murray-secret-identity/#comment-1192381</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thechurchofjesuschrist.wordpress.com/?p=1187#comment-1192381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good thing you said that in all caps or I might night have heard the full thrust of your argument. Whew...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing you said that in all caps or I might night have heard the full thrust of your argument. Whew&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
