Unsettled Christianity

One blog to rule them all, One blog to find them, One blog to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.

Archive for the ‘Media Review’ Category

May 21st, 2012 by Joel

More on the development of the character of #Sherlock from this season

Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty at the Reichenbac...

Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty at the Reichenbach Falls. From Arthur Conan Doyle's The Final Problem. Original caption in Strand Magazine was "The Death of Sherlock Holmes" (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

During my sleepless fit which lasted well into the morning hours, I was able to ponder upon this last season of Sherlock. Specifically, I pondered the development of Sherlock’s humanity.

I have it narrowed down to something like this…

In A Scandal in Belgravia, Sherlock meets Irene Adler (which I believe is an interesting twist on sexuality all of its own). Here, he feels emotions. Here, he is beat and outwitted only to come to the final solution when he realizes that what he feels she feels and thus, she is as weak as he. He was addled. She was sherlocked. They would have torn each other apart in a relationship of conventional means, but as one in which one was the cat and the other the mouse, with no set roles, both came to enjoy it in a much more fulfilling way. This well-written episode made Sherlock feel.

The Hounds of Baskerville is a different twist on the tale, but the moment when Sherlock sees the Hound, the great demon dog of Baskerville, the audience is worried that such a thing can exist. Sherlock is the quintessential calmness in the storm. No supernatural forces. Nothing. Everything is logical and has a place. And yet, he sees a ghost. In the Inn, Sherlock and Watson are talking about the case, when Sherlock breaks out in a cold sweat and begins to speak rashly to Watson, even harshly. Sherlock is made to doubt himself and thus to fear.

The Reichenbach Fall” serves as the season/series finale. It mimics The Final Problem, a short story in which Sherlock follows his nemesis off the cliff (watch Sherlock Holmes 2). This one, however, is different. It is a psychological choice. Sherlock knows he must die and comes to that conclusion before we are properly introduced to it. A striking scene is one of the final ones, in which he confronts and beats Moriarty who acknowledges that he is indeed beaten. Sherlock declares that while he sits among the angels, he is not one of them. Moriarty takes this to mean that Sherlock is not much different than himself. The mirror is given. We should understand this scene to represent that Moriarty doesn’t like the mirror he sees when he looks at Sherlock. He sees one who can live among the angels but chooses not too. Moriarty has made his bed in hell. He has clients; Sherlock has friends. To prove this distinction, Moriarty has set up three snipers to take out Sherlock’s three friends… unless Holmes jumps to his death. Sherlock routes this on Moriarty and thus we arrive at the above mentioned mirror. Moriarty does what anyone does when they do not like the image looking back at them – he breaks the glass, albeit with a bullet to the back of his skull. Sherlock knows that he now has no other choice but to jump to his death. And he does. He does so to save his friends.

Each successive episode (90 minutes worth of Sherlock goodness) develops a part of Sherlock that does finally push him over the cliff, so to speak. He is human. Yes, no ordinary human, but he is human nevertheless. Because of this, he loves, he fears, he doubts, and he sacrifices. His greatest mystery is himself and his development.

Other franchises have tried to develop this motif, most notably for the moment, Star Trek: The Next Generation. Data tries his best to be as human as possible. He achieves this with his emotional chip (Generations), explores his doubt (First Contact), and finally, makes the ultimate sacrifice (Nemesis). Data, while never fully achieving human form, achieves what it means to be human. The same could be said about the character of Pinocchio. What does it mean to be human, after all, but to be a disheveled mess. We love. We fear. We doubt. But, the ultimate act of humanity is self-sacrifice.

Ahh… yes, now the theological cap. Isn’t that the Gospel (of John) story? That the divine became human to make us and it capable of full humanity? In John’s Gospel, Jesus doubts, fears, loves, and makes the ultimate sacrifice. He is fully human, and because he is fully human, he is now fully divine.

Okay… there go. Got that out. Maybe I can sleep now.

Enhanced by Zemanta

May 20th, 2012 by Joel

Some thoughts on #Sherlock’s Finale

It was awesome. There are some loose ends which I hope will be cleared up, but over all, this was a a vehicle which showed some development for the Sherlock-Watson friendship, as well as Sherlock’s character over all. After all, the line which separates the villain from the hero is a rather small one. Sherlock and Jim are the same, except for one small issue. Sherlock has rationally chosen friends above himself, even will bemoaning that he has no actual friends.

If you’ve read the books, you know that Holmes faked his death once, so to see it on screen was expected. But, t

Sherlock (finished version)

Sherlock (finished version) (Photo credit: Dalekwidow)

he emotion which was poured into it is outstanding. Only the British seem to be able to write shows anymore that are actually intelligent and emotional. I mean, the final scene is one worth watching over and over again.

Now, how in the world do we find out how?

I think that this season (or series, if you are fortunate enough to be British) allowed for a real development of the relationships of the characters. The Adler episode was interesting for a variety of reasons. First, it developed (albeit in an unnamed manner) sapiosexuality. Clearly, both characters were sexually attracted to each other sexually, but not because of the nudity, but because of brain power both displayed. This doesn’t happen often on television. I found a quote which pretty well sums up the attraction between Sherlock and Adler,

“I want an incisive, inquisitive, insightful, irreverent mind. I want someone for whom philosophical discussion is foreplay. I want someone who sometimes makes me go ouch due to their wit and evil sense of humor. I want someone that I can reach out and touch randomly. I want someone I can cuddle with.

I decided all that means that I am sapiosexual.”

No idea where it comes from, but it is just about what you see when you watch that episode.

The Hounds episode was a different take on it, but excellent for connecting the show to the USA and current ethical dilemmas.

Anyway, not much here. Just wanted to post about Sherlock. If you haven’t seen it, go. The first season is on Netflix Streaming. You have no excuse.

Oh, and you love me, don’t watch the CBS attempt at destroying good television.

Enhanced by Zemanta

May 13th, 2012 by Joel

NBC’s Revolution is a copycat show.

When I did read fiction, I loved to read nearly anything by S.M. Stirling. (Word of warning, if the lights do go out, please, if you are around this man, run. In every book of his, he has cannibals. Seriously, run). Anyway, one of his series involves an EMP blast which destroys all power sources (including guns). Strangely enough, there is a new series coming next Fall to NBC which sorta follows the same story line.

Our entire way of life depends on electricity. So what would happen if it just stopped working? Well, one day, like a switch turned off, the world is suddenly thrust back into the dark ages. Planes fall from the sky, hospitals shut down, and communication is impossible. And without any modern technology, who can tell us why? Now, 15 years later, life is back to what it once was long before the industrial revolution: families living in quiet cul-de-sacs, and when the sun goes down lanterns and candles are lit. Life is slower and sweeter. Or is it? On the fringes of small farming communities, danger lurks. And a young woman’s life is dramatically changed when a local militia arrives and kills her father, who mysteriously – and unbeknownst to her – had something to do with the blackout. This brutal encounter sets her and two unlikely companions off on a daring coming-of-age journey to find answers about the past in the hopes of reclaiming the future.

One of the disappointing features is that it seems to lack the supernatural elements of Stirling’s work. Stirling has the old gods returning, although he makes room for Christians (not treated the best, except for Catholics).

Anyway, just call this post a rant against the lack of ideas in Hollywood and a suggestion that Hollywood is going to allow us an examination of ourselves through the medium of television of what happens with Civilization falls.

May 12th, 2012 by Joel

I’ve wasted two hours of my life on Dark Shadows – don’t make the same mistake

First, this is not a family movie. It’s just not. We really need a new rating system between PG-13 and R, I believe, but that is our mistake.

The acting was horrible, the story line never ending and poorly written, and it was just this side of campy. I was expecting a parody of the old television show, and who wouldn’t with Tim Burton and Johnny Depp? What I got was a movie which couldn’t decide if it wanted to be a parody or a real take off. It failed. Horribly.

And, honestly… the mother didn’t know that her daughter was a werewolf? There were so many plot holes that it made it difficult to actually follow the movie. Characters were there just because they were supposed to be, given no development or actual role. I kept excepting actual heart, but nothing.

This is why Joss Whedon, by law, should direct these sort of movies.

The language was not acceptable. Several of the scenes were more than suggestive. It was not scary and trust me, far, far from funny.

May 4th, 2012 by Joel

Joss Whedon assembles the #Avengers right

avengers-wallpapers5

My son, a friend of ours, and I went to see the Avengers movie (3-d) last night at the midnight showing.

I’m not a Marvel guy (not to be confused with marvelous guy, because well, I am); however, I’ve been following the various superhero movies regardless of studio. Unlike the masterminds at DC and WB, Marvel did it right. They did it slowly, developed the characters, and moved forward to a goal – The Avengers.

There is not much Joss Whedon (mythology, cf Dollhouse, Firefly, Cabin in the Woods) in the movie, although the excellent directing which he is famous for comes through. There are a few scenes of gods v gods, but they are mostly for humor-sake. One line, delivered by the boy scout Captain America about Thor the Norse thunder god, was particularly insightful. Someone told him that Thor was essentially a god, to which the Cap responds, “There is only one God, and I’m pretty sure he doesn’t dress like that.” Regarding Whedon’s eschatology, almost sort of a reverse eschatology, when an agent and the Cap were discussing the changes to the uniform, the Cap quips that maybe it was time to get rid of the stars and stripes (remember, this was a major issue from Fox News regarding Brandon Routh’s Superman Returns), the agent responds that maybe during all of the expected mess and “what’s about to be revealed,” people would need something a little old-fashioned. Beyond that, not a lot of Whedon. I mean, the story lines are pretty much written, and as we learned from Green Lantern, fanboys get pretty upset if you mess with their stuff.

As far as a kid’s movie? Not really that bad. The violence was space action, of course. Lots of one liners, but they fit. The characters actually acted like heroes. I mean, you would think with an already proven cast, that you’d have ego issues. The camera had no real favorites, a directorial feat, I believe.

Overall… 13 out of 5 stars.

April 21st, 2012 by Joel

Joss Whedon, Christus Victor, Science is dead, long live the old gods! Cabin in the Woods

I got a lot of good things from this movie, of course.

The movie is bracketed by discussions that perhaps our world, or even our race, has come to an end. Maybe it is time to pass it on. The first discussion centered around the use of technology while the latter, the inhuman consideration that a friend could readily kill another friend.

Marty is the kill figure in these discussions. He is also a stoner, so much so that laced weed no longer affects him. He makes the statement along the lines of “Society needs to crumble…. we are just afraid to let it.” In the end, he and his friend, who both contemplated letting the other die, one to save the world and one out of revenge, discuss that maybe we no longer deserve to be the dominant species on the plant.

This is Whedon’s style though, isn’t it? In Firefly and Dollhouse, there is the underlying theme that society has reached a level of corruption, inhumanity, and immorality and all guided by technology.

Once the group arrives, they go to their respective rooms. In one room in particular, there is a see-through mirror underneath a gruesome painting of a sacrifice. It is decided that they will leave the painting in place. When the camera pulls away, the audience gets to see that people are watching the camping party which makes any sense of modesty seem silly. After all, we are voyeurs, aren’t we? Marty replies later that one of the girls cannot see what she doesn’t want to see… that we aren’t who we are.

In a twist on the horror genre, magic, monsters, and old gods exist and they are protected by science. These, we are told, are where our nightmares come from, rather than the reverse.

Another scene which got me was when Marty walks outside, seeing no stars, mentions that “we are abandoned.” Odd, considering that for some, the stars were gods.

In the end, the Director gives Marty a choice – either die with them, or die for him. He was the one which was needed to die. But, he didn’t.

The old gods return.

So much for a part two.

Some serious language at the beginning and other scenes not suitable to people under 30.

March 23rd, 2012 by Joel

It takes a dystopia to give Appalachian people a good report #hungergames

My son, a friend of his, and I went and saw the Hunger Games a wee bit ago. My wife and daughter saw it at midnight. This is an excellent movie, and important.

A couple of themes which are important (to me). First, District 12 is in Appalachia, with coal being the main energy production. There is a antique quality to the town setting, with barely any technology, resembling a company town of the 1930′s. As a matter of fact, the only technology present is for indoctrination by the State. The people are dressed in plain attire in 12, with each district having their own set cultural expectation.

The Hunger Games

The Hunger Games (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The movie takes place some 74 years after a revolt in which the countryside rebelled against The Capitol. I haven’t read the book, and I doubt I will anytime soon, but there is some backstory here. Interesting, The Capitol, set in the western part of North America, treats the rest of the continent as a colony. The Capitol is also the most technologically advanced place, as well as culturally radical.

Frankly, there is a pre-Occupy notion of the 1% v 99% going on around the movie.

There is the theme of mimetic desire. Rene Girard would be proud to see his work placed in a movie form. What? Well, each year, a gladiatorial-type game is played in which the winner essentially becomes the image of The Capitol in their district. It takes lots of bloodletting to become the victor. Kids kill kids in view of the world.

No religion is mentioned, only the control of the State. Appalachia is given a good view, with the people, even in a past-future type of theme, not the bumbling morons that Hollywood usually portrays them as.

There is some violence, but I don’t think any terrible language. No real adult situations, unless you count the killing of 8 and 9 year olds, among other ages.

One of the big themes is that the main character gives hope, and hope is stronger than fear. Hope will bring life and justice, and challenge the State. The main character is flawed, using emotions to win the game, in the end. She doesn’t want to kill anyone, but she must to win. She is a volunteer, to safe her sister.

I might have to see it again.

It is a book, I imagine, which is a sign of the symptom of the times.

Enhanced by Zemanta

March 10th, 2012 by Joel

Unsettling Movies: John Carter

Cover of "A Princess of Mars"

Cover of A Princess of Mars

My son and I love to watch superhero and other fantasy/sci-fi movies. Last summer, we watched every midnight opening of the superhero genre. We’ll do the same thing this coming summer as well.

Anyway, this afternoon, we went to see John Carter, based on a 100 year old book, The Princess of Mars.

It was awesome. Go see it. Disney has made a real family-friendly science fiction movie.

I noticed a few themes which Rodney would focus on, like the issue of race. From what I understand, this is developed in the other books of the series. Edgar Rice Burroughs, the author, as he does with Tarzan, places a different view on races by taking characters out of their context. In this incarnation of the movie, John Carter is a former Captain in the Confederate army. He lands on Mars.

On Mars, there are humanoids and other creatures which look radically different than, well, us. Carter seems to have to no issue with this, although, by all rights, he should. There are many colors – the red, the blue, green, and so on. This movie deals with the Red Martians who are at civil war. Oddly enough, while they feel superior to all other colors, they are the product of selective breeding between three other races.

There is a religious undertone, but not much… except for the time when the Princess acknowledges that her gods are really machines, giving place to science.

Anyway, it’s a good movie.

Enhanced by Zemanta

February 10th, 2012 by Joel

The NLT Life Application Study Bible is now on iPad @tyndalehouse

You can read about it at the NLT Blog.

Also, Tyndale was kind enough to send me a copy of it, for free, so you can expect a review of it… Going to be good stuff.

November 3rd, 2011 by Geoff

Shine TV: We need your money!

No.. its true.. we do..

Shine TV is a national TV station here in New Zealand, devoted to Christian content. We have a fairly unique way of presenting our stuff, and “the way we do it” is slow revolutionising the way Christian TV is done… United Christian Broadcasting, which sprang from the organisation that runs Shine, is responsible for uniting something like 30 countries and helping spread the message about Jesus via media of all kinds. Rhema Broadcasting is the first independant national Christian broadcaster in the world. We’ve been doing it for something like 30 years and are completely donation/subscriber supported.

Normally we only appeal to New Zealanders, but we now have people watching and listening to our content world wide through the internet. If you have a few dollars spare, please go here and slip us a few… We really do appreciate it, and it helps keep me and my american wife employed gainfully :P (and about 75 other staff).

We also are responsible for:

Radio Rhema

LifeFm

Southern Star Radio

The Word

Our mission statement is:

Vision Statement

To lift up the name of Jesus Christ and communicate the reality of a personal relationship with Him to the people of New Zealand, through Christian broadcasting, as part of the Body of Christ for the glory of God.

Mission Statement

  • To promote the Gospel of Jesus Christ
  • To operate broadcasting networks in New Zealand
  • To promote Biblical values, such as righteousness, justice and mercy
  • To encourage, exhort and challenge through music and other programming
  • To educate, inform and entertain for the promotion of well-being amongst New Zealanders
  • To expand the networks to effectively reach the people of New Zealand
  • To explore new avenues for Christian programming and/or broadcasting
 Please watch our stream, or listen to the radio online, andif you like it.. one of my dollars is 80 cents US.. so your money goes a long way for us..
(in case you are wondering, I am an IT engineer here)
Enhanced by Zemanta