Saw this on FB.

By the way, if you think it is the clothes that causes rape — rape happens in societies with women covered head to toe.
We have a real problem in the United States…
Saw this on FB.

By the way, if you think it is the clothes that causes rape — rape happens in societies with women covered head to toe.
We have a real problem in the United States…
Following my earlier post on an upcoming Christian seminar pushing the validity of ‘Reparative Therapy’ or ‘Gay Conversion Therapy’ I received the following Tweet:
@echurchblog I’d suggest that the real problem is not psychological but spiritual.
— Ploughboy (@MPloughboy) January 21, 2013
This set off a lightbulb within me and a chain of thoughts.
If Christians regard homosexuality as a spiritual issue – and the practice as a sin – then why turn to ‘gay conversion’ psychological therapy.
Is it that some Christians believe homosexuality to be a mental disorder that can be treated? This explanation is the only reason I can think of to advocate psychological therapy.
If not a mental disorder, then continuing this line of reasoning, if psychological therapy is appropriate for this particular ‘spiritual problem’ then why not all spiritual issues?
Why is psychological therapy not advocated for all sinful temptations?
Could it not be equally argued that all sinful temptations are environmentally produced – as opposed to hard-wired – and in need of rectification through psychological therapy, as is posited for sexual orientation.
If sexual orientation is a mental disorder to be ‘cured’ through therapy, can we confidently even consider the practice of homosexuality as sin any longer?
Are sexual orientation temptations in some way qualitatively different to any other temptations of the flesh?
Of course, the irony is that those Christians pushing for Conversion Therapy are usually to be found most ardently in the anti-psychology camp.
These thoughts have only just occurred to me and so I’m thinking on the fly.
Feel free to chip in.
HT MG via Twitter
I admit – when if first found out our new associate pastor would be a woman, I was hesitant, but then I found she knew karate and then I got too worried to leave
Biola University professors Brad Christerson, M. Elizabeth Lewis Hall, and Shelly Cunningham, authors of “Women Faculty at an Evangelical University: The Paradox of Religiously Driven Gender Inequalities and High Job Satisfaction” attribute this paradox to “benevolent sexism” and the high value evangelicals place on personal relationships. Karen Swallow Prior, chair of the department of English and Modern Languages at Liberty University and a regular contributor to Her.meneutics, interviewed the scholars about their findings.
via The ‘Benevolent Sexism’ at Christian Colleges | Christianity Today.
Gotta tuck this away for a bit… but, a quick read reveals what we are identifying with women in general… equality is not all that equal.
Granted, I am sure this is all a marketing ploy – which means Bic thinks women are really stupid, regardless of whatever else they think about women
Besides, why do women need special pens? If they know how to write, any ole pen will do for a recipe card, right?
So a drunk cop walks into a bar and manhandles a woman without permission and in a crude way… guess who is at fault… guess the gender of the judge:
Bad things can happen in bars, Hatch told the victim, adding that other people might be more intoxicated than she was.
“If you wouldn’t have been there that night, none of this would have happened to you,” Hatch said.
Hatch told the victim and the defendant that no one would be happy with the sentence she gave, but that finding an appropriate sentence was her duty.
“I hope you look at what you’ve been through and try to take something positive out of it,” Hatch said to the victim in court. “You learned a lesson about friendship and you learned a lesson about vulnerability.”
Hatch said that the victim was not to blame in the case, but that all women must be vigilant against becoming victims.
“When you blame others, you give up your power to change,” Hatch said that her mother used to say.
The textbook that Clovis Unified uses for high school sex education does not mention condoms at all, even in chapters about HIV/AIDS and on preventing STDs and unintended pregnancy. Instead, for example, the textbook lists that the ways to prevent STDs are to respect yourself, get plenty of rest, go out as a group and practice abstinence.
The curriculum teaches that all people, even adults, should avoid sexual activity until they are married. Additional materials compare a woman who is not a virgin to a dirty shoe and suggest that men are unable to stop themselves once they become sexually aroused. (here)
Okay… so, since we are all adults here…
Being away will not keep you from getting STDs. Neither will self-respect. Sure, abstinence will, I guess, but the other stuff seems a bit like the 1950′s…
And… why is it that a woman who has sex before marriage is a “dirty shoe” but a man is not? And honestly, is a thin piece of body tissue the defining characteristic of a woman so that if it is missing, she is no longer worthy anything? Only good to kill bugs with and as a dog’s chew toy?
And so men are engines that if you turn them on… they can’t stop… so if you turn them on and if they run over you, you (the woman) is at fault?
And no one things we have a massive problem in this country?
The research, published in the European Journal of Social Psychology, suggests that we process images of men and women differently in the brain. “Global” cognitive processing, which is the brain’s method of interpreting an image in its entirety, is more often employed when viewing men. However, “local” cognitive processing, or seeing the parts that make up the whole, is the brain’s apparent default method for women.
via Why your brain sees men as people and women as body parts – chicagotribune.com.
You know my title is ironic. This is an interesting study. Not sure what it means, but it is interesting…
So to Doug Wilson I say: Bully for you! Way to stand your ground. You’ve been in the right all along and you’ve handled things like a scholar and a gentleman. And good for your girls. They were the picture of class. Those who think otherwise need to learn how to read way more gooder.
via Bully for You! | Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth.
Nick Norelli, for some reason, loves the neo-Confederate, pro-slavery, anti-women Doug Wilson – going so far as to be a total @$$ to Rachel Held Evans.
A bully? She’s a bully? Oh come on… Did Nick even read the garbage that the Wilsons wrote?
So I guess Rachel and others should have just known their place, kept quite, and did nothing?
Or, when J. Wilson did apologize, Grace was brought forth, and that is condemned as well?
And what is “ladylike?” Yael? Would Nick condemn Yael as well?
Disgusting…
This happened in Charleston this past week:
Meeting in Charleston, W.V., nearly two-thirds of the 227 delegates at the Northeastern Jurisdiction of United Methodism approved the resolution on Thursday.
“…while bound to the Book of Discipline, [Jurisdiction leaders] are also bound to exercise their consciences and are bound by Jesus’s commandment to stand with the marginalized and the oppressed in our midst when called upon to enforce unjust laws, policies and procedures to the detriment of gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender individuals wishing to participate fully in the life of The United Methodist Church,” reads the resolution.
I have a few structural problems with this.
I think that we should be called to covenant, obey that covenant, and if that covenant needs to be changed, be forced to do so, but not by the elites, the powerful. Several theories of ethics show that those who do these things are no more free of guilt than those who oppose such measures. This resolution, but a select few that has no real bearing on the everyday, is worst than a measure that would push these people further in the closet.
But, I am a Methodist and tomorrow, I’ll go to my Methodist Church. We are, after all, God’s people.