Review, @bakeracademic’s Scripture and Tradition: What the Bible Really Says

Many people do not know the difference between tradition and Tradition. It is not just a stylistic preference, but one meant to give a greater meaning to the word when used by particular Christians with particular reasons. This is only one of the many areas of disheveled understanding Edith Humphrey attempts to straighten out for those who are struggling with the supposed dichotomy between Scripture and Tradition. This is a deeply insightful book, arguing not for one position or another so much as it presents with careful detail to the witness of Scripture the value and place of Tradition.

Humphrey presents in 6 chapters (and a conclusion) the case for a better understanding of Tradition. She speaks somewhat to her upbringing in the Salvation Army and her move to the Orthodox Church. This is heartening, as her approach is not one-sided and without experience but from one who has stood in both arenas. She knows well the dogma attached to those who are anti-tradition as well as the counterpoints. I found myself rather enjoying the communication of her past and present as the most grounding of the book — as something touching both camps significantly more than the logic of her words.

The first chapter of Scripture and Tradition attempts to reclaim the meaning of (T)radition by examining the translations and other missteps we employ ourselves. She notes well the role of the word translation and its rather intended meaning, interpretation. Whether it is the King James Version or the New Living Translation, all translations are but interpretations. She then focuses on the Greek here, paradosis and paradidōmi. This is not as in depth or unfriendly to autodidacts as one might suppose. She ends the chapter by calling attention to the argument of the anti-traditionalists that Scripture is not all there is and the rather tenuous notion this posits. Finally, Humphrey would have us see ourselves not as the “people of the book” but as the “people o the Christ. (44)”

Her second and third chapter delves into the history of what Paul meant by paradosis and paradidōmi as compared to other Jewish traditions of the time. She is careful here to approach Protestants with ease so as to not take away from her argument. She understands the role that word has taken in our own tradition against tradition (see 67 for the perfect analogy here). She also decides to speak to those who value Tradition, reminding them of the proper place of the written word(s) — not just Scripture, but so too creeds, liturgy, and other lettered orally expressed beliefs. In her third chapter — she considers this the core — she works to discover what the New Testament is saying in regards to Tradition.

The final three chapters explore the theological allowance for Tradition, or rather, how best to accept Tradition as a theological necessity. She contends Tradition is God’s gift to the Church (chapter 5, 109). It is a gift, however, that gives and is the gift. Tradition is given to us and we pass it on. It is a rather economic gift (108). With all of this, however, Humphrey closes the work with a word of warning against simply taking everything traditional as good. She commends to us freedom as well. Accompanying this chapter are four case studies of Tradition in Church History.

Edith Humphrey mentions several times throughout this book about a personal discovery of Tradition as well as mentioning the rise of those, especially among Protestants, who are (re)discovering the Great Tradition. We can look at this one of two ways. Perhaps the Spirit is calling us back to a better reformation or rather people are finding that in the times of shifting sand holding on Tradition helps them to maintain some balance. What Humphrey does is to couch Tradition next to Scripture — not equally, but not sub-ordinate either — as an inseparable gift from God to the Church. She maintains a constant Scriptural edge throughout the book, dedicating herself to judicious review by those who would readily dismiss all things non-Scriptural. How can they if they honestly read her book?

Post By Joel Watts (10,052 Posts)

Joel L. Watts holds a Masters of Arts from United Theological Seminary with a focus in literary and rhetorical criticism of the New Testament. He is currently a Ph.D. student at the University of the Free State, analyzing Paul’s model of atonement in Galatians. He is the author of Mimetic Criticism of the Gospel of Mark: Introduction and Commentary (Wipf and Stock, 2013), a co-editor and contributor to From Fear to Faith: Stories of Hitting Spiritual Walls (Energion, 2013), and Praying in God's Theater, Meditations on the Book of Revelation (Wipf and Stock, 2014).

Website: → Unsettled Christianity

Connect

5 thoughts on Review, @bakeracademic’s Scripture and Tradition: What the Bible Really Says

  1. Glad you liked the book, Joel. I see that you are also keen on rhetorical/literary analysis of the Bible. You might like my _And I Turned to See the Voice_, a literary-rhetorical approach to visions in the NT. I plan to check out your Mark tome.

  2. Thanks for reviewing this book. I discussed it a little with Edith a month ago and thought about buying it. This makes me even more interested!

  3. That “tradition” is “inspired” is just as difficult to prove as “the Bible” is “inspired.”

Leave a Reply, Please!