
There is another poster floating around about the possiblity of a multiverse where the male is able to sleep with Ms. Watson. Personally… No, never mind… That’s toooo personal… But beauty… Beauty is not about sex… Why are we so caught up ok that…

There is another poster floating around about the possiblity of a multiverse where the male is able to sleep with Ms. Watson. Personally… No, never mind… That’s toooo personal… But beauty… Beauty is not about sex… Why are we so caught up ok that…
Post By Joel (9,262 Posts)
Joel L. Watts holds a Masters of Arts from United Theological Seminary with a focus in literary and rhetorical criticism of the New Testament. His interests include exploring the role of mimesis in human civilization, specifically in the study of religion and media, as well as science fiction and the way in which it has allowed mythology to be explored in light of scientific discoveries of the past century. He is the author of Mimetic Criticism of the Gospel of Mark: Introduction and Commentary (Wipf and Stock, 2013) and a co-editor and contributor to From Fear to Faith: Stories of Hitting Spiritual Walls (Energion, 2013).
Website: → Unsettled Christianity
Tags: Emma Watson, harry potter
Posted in Other Posts

Copyright © 2013 by Unsettled Christianity. All Rights Reserved. Subscribe to Unsettled Christianity's RSS feed. Made by ThemeSweet. Proudly powered by WordPress.
I think that we fail to distinguish between beauty and sex appeal because of trivializing everything. I think that it’s very much the same as the fact that we have less focus on psychological thriller movies and more “splatter” films. It’s lazy and appeals to people who don’t want to put the work into anything.
Even sex appeal has been pulled down to the level of — for lack of a better expression — implied promiscuity. If you can look at someone and pretend that she’s putting herself on display for you, then that’s supposed to be a turn-on. Because it’s lazy.