So posits a few pundits:
A number of analysts have observed that although bin Laden was finally killed, he won some major successes in his war against the US. “He repeatedly asserted that the only way to drive the US from the Muslim world and defeat its satraps was by drawing Americans into a series of small but expensive wars that would ultimately bankrupt them,” Eric Margolis writes. “‘Bleeding the US,’ in his words. The United States, first under George W Bush and then Barack Obama, rushed right into bin Laden’s trap … Grotesquely overblown military outlays and debt addiction … may be the most pernicious legacy of the man who thought he could defeat the United States” – particularly when the debt is being cynically exploited by the far right, with the collusion of the Democrat establishment, to undermine what remains of social programs, public education, unions, and, in general, remaining barriers to corporate tyranny.
We sit here ten years removed, with a war which threatens to rage for another decade. It is bankrupting us. It is causing divisions in the country. And yet, have we truly examined the ‘why’?
Related articles
- The 9/11 response: Wrong from start to finish (cbsnews.com)
- Noam Chomsky: Was There an Alternative? (huffingtonpost.com)
- Has Osama defeated America? (politics.ie)
- Osama crippled the American century (alhittin.com)
- What we should have done after 9/11 (salon.com)












