Unsettled Christianity

One blog to rule them all, One blog to find them, One blog to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
May 21st, 2012 by Joel

Can you be too catholic to understand Catholicism?

Peter Leithart is. He has a series of questions for those moving away from Protestantism to Catholicism. I’m not a Catholic, although I am a pretty high church Protestant, so I’m going to answer these questions from experience. His questions are in bold. My reply is in blue.

Here’s the question I would ask to any Protestant considering a move: What are you saying about your past Christian experience by moving to Rome or Constantinople?  

The same thing anyone says about any move in Christianity. That they are growing. 

Are you willing to start going to a Eucharistic table where your Protestant friends are no longer welcome?  How is that different from Peter’s withdrawal from table fellowship with Gentiles?  

Would Peter accept a Eucharistic table with emergents? Cool, if he does, but does he realize how many Protestants are against the Open Table concept? That is has a long standing history in Protestantism? That many churches, sects, and denominations practice the Lord’s Supper being given only to members or members in good standing? Is this all that different? Is it wrong? 

Are you willing to say that every faithful saint you have known is living a sub-Christian existence because they are not in churches that claim apostolic succession, no matter how fruitful their lives have been in faith, hope, and love?  

See the above question and think about how Peter’s post on Catholicism fits into his question. He is saying the exact same thing about Catholics that Catholics, he believes, says about him. 

via Peter J. Leithart » Blog Archive » Too catholic to be Catholic.

There is more in the post, but you’ll have to read it.

I love mirrors, because sometimes, the best ones, are those which we look into and think we are looking at someone else. Peter is not too catholic to be Catholic. He practices much of the same beliefs he sees as pitiful in others.

And honestly, icons are awesome. So is the host. If I could get my home church to put the un-eaten portions of the host into a container for meditation, I would – and don’t think that I haven’t asked, repeatedly.

Scripture isn’t a boundary, but a starting point and a guide. If Peter really feels like the Church can only permit what Scripture explicitly teachers, then he should not be Reformed, or Christian.

May 21st, 2012 by Joel

Concentration Camps for the Queers

So sayeth Pastor Worley,

“I figured a way to get rid of all the lesbians and queers,” he says in his sermon, delivered on May 13. “Build a great, big, large fence — 150 or 100 mile long — put all the lesbians in there… Do the same thing for the queers and the homosexuals and have that fence electrified so they can’t get out… And you know what, in a few years, they’ll die.” (ht)

Pastor Charles L. Worley of Providence Road Baptist Church — located at 3283 Providence Mill Rd, Maiden, NC 28650 — is seen here from a service posted to the church’s website dated May 13, 2012 calling for the starvation and ultimate death of “queers and homosexuals.”

Also, because Worley needs another angel to help, we have Lesly Charles, an NYPD cop and prophet who utters some pretty disgusting language. He simply responds,

 “I’m just doing God’s work. You know I can’t comment. Have a blessed day.”

 

May 21st, 2012 by Joel

What is your theological cap?

Someone mentioned a theological cap yesterday. Got me to thinking…

Here are a couple.

The first is the firefighter. This cap fits those who only make theology up on the fly, to put down a theological fire by flooding it with war.

firefighter

The police hat are for those who like their theology well structured. No one steps outside the line. That’s it. Boom.

Digital StillCamera

And of course, my favorite. The Sherlock hate. The theological detective.

sherlock

 

 

May 21st, 2012 by Joel

More on the development of the character of #Sherlock from this season

Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty at the Reichenbac...

Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty at the Reichenbach Falls. From Arthur Conan Doyle's The Final Problem. Original caption in Strand Magazine was "The Death of Sherlock Holmes" (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

During my sleepless fit which lasted well into the morning hours, I was able to ponder upon this last season of Sherlock. Specifically, I pondered the development of Sherlock’s humanity.

I have it narrowed down to something like this…

In A Scandal in Belgravia, Sherlock meets Irene Adler (which I believe is an interesting twist on sexuality all of its own). Here, he feels emotions. Here, he is beat and outwitted only to come to the final solution when he realizes that what he feels she feels and thus, she is as weak as he. He was addled. She was sherlocked. They would have torn each other apart in a relationship of conventional means, but as one in which one was the cat and the other the mouse, with no set roles, both came to enjoy it in a much more fulfilling way. This well-written episode made Sherlock feel.

The Hounds of Baskerville is a different twist on the tale, but the moment when Sherlock sees the Hound, the great demon dog of Baskerville, the audience is worried that such a thing can exist. Sherlock is the quintessential calmness in the storm. No supernatural forces. Nothing. Everything is logical and has a place. And yet, he sees a ghost. In the Inn, Sherlock and Watson are talking about the case, when Sherlock breaks out in a cold sweat and begins to speak rashly to Watson, even harshly. Sherlock is made to doubt himself and thus to fear.

The Reichenbach Fall” serves as the season/series finale. It mimics The Final Problem, a short story in which Sherlock follows his nemesis off the cliff (watch Sherlock Holmes 2). This one, however, is different. It is a psychological choice. Sherlock knows he must die and comes to that conclusion before we are properly introduced to it. A striking scene is one of the final ones, in which he confronts and beats Moriarty who acknowledges that he is indeed beaten. Sherlock declares that while he sits among the angels, he is not one of them. Moriarty takes this to mean that Sherlock is not much different than himself. The mirror is given. We should understand this scene to represent that Moriarty doesn’t like the mirror he sees when he looks at Sherlock. He sees one who can live among the angels but chooses not too. Moriarty has made his bed in hell. He has clients; Sherlock has friends. To prove this distinction, Moriarty has set up three snipers to take out Sherlock’s three friends… unless Holmes jumps to his death. Sherlock routes this on Moriarty and thus we arrive at the above mentioned mirror. Moriarty does what anyone does when they do not like the image looking back at them – he breaks the glass, albeit with a bullet to the back of his skull. Sherlock knows that he now has no other choice but to jump to his death. And he does. He does so to save his friends.

Each successive episode (90 minutes worth of Sherlock goodness) develops a part of Sherlock that does finally push him over the cliff, so to speak. He is human. Yes, no ordinary human, but he is human nevertheless. Because of this, he loves, he fears, he doubts, and he sacrifices. His greatest mystery is himself and his development.

Other franchises have tried to develop this motif, most notably for the moment, Star Trek: The Next Generation. Data tries his best to be as human as possible. He achieves this with his emotional chip (Generations), explores his doubt (First Contact), and finally, makes the ultimate sacrifice (Nemesis). Data, while never fully achieving human form, achieves what it means to be human. The same could be said about the character of Pinocchio. What does it mean to be human, after all, but to be a disheveled mess. We love. We fear. We doubt. But, the ultimate act of humanity is self-sacrifice.

Ahh… yes, now the theological cap. Isn’t that the Gospel (of John) story? That the divine became human to make us and it capable of full humanity? In John’s Gospel, Jesus doubts, fears, loves, and makes the ultimate sacrifice. He is fully human, and because he is fully human, he is now fully divine.

Okay… there go. Got that out. Maybe I can sleep now.

Enhanced by Zemanta

May 21st, 2012 by Joel

Good news! @UnitedSeminary will be co-hosting the 2012 Jesus Conference

I received this in an email from Dr. Keith shortly before my midnight hour:

The 2012 Jesus Conference will be held Oct. 4 and 5, 2012 in Dayton, OH.  The co-hosts are United Theological Seminary and the University of Dayton’s Center for Scriptural Exegesis, Philosophy, and Doctrine.  We’re very excited to partner with these institutions and their fine faculty.  More information concerning registration, schedule, etc., will be forthcoming.

This is fantastic news!

As you know, I attend United so I am especially happy about this news.

May 20th, 2012 by Joel

Some thoughts on #Sherlock’s Finale

It was awesome. There are some loose ends which I hope will be cleared up, but over all, this was a a vehicle which showed some development for the Sherlock-Watson friendship, as well as Sherlock’s character over all. After all, the line which separates the villain from the hero is a rather small one. Sherlock and Jim are the same, except for one small issue. Sherlock has rationally chosen friends above himself, even will bemoaning that he has no actual friends.

If you’ve read the books, you know that Holmes faked his death once, so to see it on screen was expected. But, t

Sherlock (finished version)

Sherlock (finished version) (Photo credit: Dalekwidow)

he emotion which was poured into it is outstanding. Only the British seem to be able to write shows anymore that are actually intelligent and emotional. I mean, the final scene is one worth watching over and over again.

Now, how in the world do we find out how?

I think that this season (or series, if you are fortunate enough to be British) allowed for a real development of the relationships of the characters. The Adler episode was interesting for a variety of reasons. First, it developed (albeit in an unnamed manner) sapiosexuality. Clearly, both characters were sexually attracted to each other sexually, but not because of the nudity, but because of brain power both displayed. This doesn’t happen often on television. I found a quote which pretty well sums up the attraction between Sherlock and Adler,

“I want an incisive, inquisitive, insightful, irreverent mind. I want someone for whom philosophical discussion is foreplay. I want someone who sometimes makes me go ouch due to their wit and evil sense of humor. I want someone that I can reach out and touch randomly. I want someone I can cuddle with.

I decided all that means that I am sapiosexual.”

No idea where it comes from, but it is just about what you see when you watch that episode.

The Hounds episode was a different take on it, but excellent for connecting the show to the USA and current ethical dilemmas.

Anyway, not much here. Just wanted to post about Sherlock. If you haven’t seen it, go. The first season is on Netflix Streaming. You have no excuse.

Oh, and you love me, don’t watch the CBS attempt at destroying good television.

Enhanced by Zemanta

May 20th, 2012 by Joel

Our close friend, Pakistan

 The chairman of Pakistan’s telecommunications authority says the government has blocked the social networking website Twitter because of material considered offensive to Islam.

via Pakistan blocks Twitter over ‘offensive’ material | Fox News.

Yeah… plus, they love the people that hate us. So, why in the world are continuing to give them money?

Anyone else think that our foreign policy is based on whatever decision sounds the worst?

May 19th, 2012 by Joel

John Loftus, Quitter

Our good friend, John Loftus, has declared that since he had made no head way in his war on Christianity, he is packing it in. Bully for him. Of course, he says that he is just tired of kicking a dead horse, although it seems that atheism is the dead horse.

You know, I don’t mind people going against the flow – as a matter of fact, I suggest it – but when no one listens to you, you may wish to reconsider your position. I mean, if you are only attracting people like you, then you may in fact be wrong.

Now, for me, I’ve seen Christianity grow, and count the New Atheists (even those whom, um, are tag alongs) as sort of like prophetic figures who are pushing us to greater heights.

People like John have come and gone for a very, very long time and yet Christianity is still here. So, John, we’ll wait for you to come back around to the faith. Good luck. I hope that if he comes back this way again, his arguments are better. They were the same, tired, stuff.

Oh well… You can read his poor, poor pitiful me post here:

Debunking Christianity: Okay, The Time Has Come, I’m Done.

May 19th, 2012 by Joel

Sounds like a great new interdisciplinary field to work in

It’s called Big History. It is about connecting the dots from the Big Bang until today. Ed posted this on Facebook sometime this week. Thought I’d share. Looks real, real interesting, in a panentheistic kind of way:

As humans, we are inherently interested in understanding our origins. Every culture has creation myths that try to explain how the world and its inhabitants came to be. With the rise of science, especially in the last several centuries, we are now in a much better position to appreciate and understand where we came from. It is a fascinating story that takes us from the beginning of the universe to recent times. To understand the major events and patterns of our origins gives us a much better appreciation of our place in the world today. The story of our origins is multi-layered, essentially a long series of origins, each building on the ones that came before it.

This website project, FROM THE BIG BANG TO THE WORLD WIDE WEB™, has been developed by us (Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth) as a critical component of a long-range and multifaceted project to promote science education and large-scale evolutionary thinking. We are the founders and co-directors of THE STONE AGE INSTITUTE® (www.stoneageinstitute.org), a federally-approved non-profit 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to human origins research and science education, and are both Professors of Anthropology and Cognitive Science at Indiana University, Bloomington, as well as founders and co-directors of Indiana University’s Center for Research into the Anthropological Foundations of Technology (CRAFT). We are also Fellows of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Although our primary research focus over the past three decades has been on the origins and development of human technology during the course of human evolution, we also have a keen interest in physics (we own a first edition of Max Planck’s 1897 book Thermodynamik, which established the foundations of quantum mechanics), astronomy and planetary science (we collect meteorites, which have been exhibited in the Indiana State Museum in Indianapolis), geology, biology, palaeontology, archaeology, and history. We have assembled a personal library of several hundred books on a wide range of topics regarding Deep Time (sometimes called “Big History”), and subscribe to a number of professional journals (including Science and Nature) to keep up with the current state of knowledge in a range of scientific fields.

the Stone Age Institute – From the Big Bang to the World Wide Web – About This Project.

May 19th, 2012 by Joel

The picture of why Evangelical theology fails

20120519-194935.jpg

You get it, don’t you?